<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</guid><description><![CDATA[dang that looks really nice, umpcs get better and better all the time, i really have hope for them now as opposed to a few months ago,  keep em coming, till i get my new comp this fall.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2007 11:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Are you kidding? That shit is hideous. I wonder how the track pad works if a slim person's finger takes up the entire tracking surface.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellianth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2007 11:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its really.. ugly.. and just looks like a laptop.. which isn't really what a umpc is supposed to be about is it? :\]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pc_Madness]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2007 2:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</guid><description><![CDATA[This would be great for a covert operative with a collapsible satellite antennae]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Big]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2007 11:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</guid><description><![CDATA[This actually a VIA reference design that Packard Bell announced a retail product on at the show.  I guess FIC was the partner making it for VIA:<br><br><a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=419" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=419</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 15th 2007 7:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yep, it's the Nanobook that Mr. Rojas wrote about a few days ago.<br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/05/via-intros-nanobook-ultra-mobile-device-600-ultraportable-lap/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/05/via-intros-nanobook-ultra-mobile-device-600-ultraportable-lap/</a><br><br>FIC goes by Everex in the U.S. and unlike the European Packard Bell unit, this one is supposed to have a touchscreen and all those removable modules beside the screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2007 7:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not to sound like a basher/hater - but that thing does look pretty damn ugly.  Reminds me of a mutant child of some low-end budget hp laptop from a few years back.<br><br>Also, a bit off topic, but could someone explain this to me; I wondered it for a long long time now - what's the point of running full blown OS's on these "mobile" devices.  I mean the screen is barely barely big enough to even fit most of the dialogs in the OS - the keyboards and (what is that? a trackpad) -- usually suck and most importantly, the battery life doesn't go above 3-4 hours at most.  IF at the very least, these units would be cheap - but most of them are a 1000+ dollars, but they're not even that- so just those few things kill 99% of the reasons why anyone would ever consider something like this instead of a laptop...<br><br>Sigh, I'll never understand these manufacturers; trying to conquer a nonexistent market for devices somewhere between a smart phone and a laptop...<br><br>Just my few cents :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael La Framboise]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2007 2:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</guid><description><![CDATA[The design IMO is alright, but it could do with getting rid of that touchpad and putting a trackpoint instead. <br><br>But what is with that smallish screen? UMPCs are already small enough, so why are companies like FIC and Asus thinks it is okay to put a small screen with huge bezels?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2007 7:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Simple Specs Manufactuers... just listen to us.<br><br>Sub 500.00 price<br>Multi-Touch screen<br>Thin and Light enough to not be a burden to carry<br>at LEAST 6 hour battery life<br>BT 2.0, WiFi, USB, Audio, DVI, Flashreader<br>Sturdy Built enough want to carry around without breaking it<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wabguard-email]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2007 8:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Simpler specs than that, even.<br><br>If I can run a real OS (not a stripped down version) then a multi-touch screen isn't needed.  For me, even having a touch screen is optional, but I can see how it would be a deal-breaker for a lot of people.<br><br>Bluetooth and flash card readers can be added via USB (and leaving them out will help get below that $500 price).<br><br>DVI output onboard is nice but it's probably not a deal-breaker if it's via a docking station rather than on the computer itself.  (Total lack of DVI would be a deal-breaker for many people, I'm sure.)<br><br>4 to 5 hours battery life is okay as long as a second battery can be had relatively cheaply, and there is a way to charge it outside of the computer itself.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew G]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2007 7:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like it alot.<br>I also don't like track pads, but something is better than nothing. <br>A trackpoint would be a bit more compact.<br><br>If I was going to use it for any amount of time I think I'd probably still wind up carrying a wireless mouse, but that's not a deal breaker for me at all.<br><br>It strikes me that if this is the biggest issue I can come up with then they might have a pretty good thing there!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2007 8:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</guid><description><![CDATA[UMPC + Integrated Keyboard + Touchpad = LAPTOP, not UMPC damnit!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Malfunction]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 10th 2007 3:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FIC's seven-inch CE261 UMPC spotted at Computex]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/09/fics-seven-inch-ce261-umpc-spotted-at-computex/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with you, what's the point of having all of that and still trying to call it a UMPC when it clearly isn't.<br><br>I now have a UMPC made by TabletKiosk. No way would I want to have a tiny little keyboard and all the extra do-dads this thing throws on there because they think this is what I "want" in a UMPC.<br><br>A UMPC as outlined by Microsoft and further developed by Intel, Samsung, Asus and TabletKiosk (among a few others) is supposed to primarily be a slate device. You interact with it primarily through touch/digital ink. You can add the option of a keyboard if you desire by one of the convertible ones or an added on bluetooth or USB keyboard.<br><br>Everything else is just a really small laptop. And if that is what you want, that is what you should get.<br><br>But they shouldn't be calling this a UMPC just because it has a small screen. The concept is difficult enough for people to wrap their heads around without muddying the waters.<br><br>Major Malfunction, you hit the nail on the head.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Walker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2007 1:48AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
