<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for When good toys go bad VI: baby monitor swipes NASA shuttle feed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/when-good-toys-go-bad-vi-baby-monitor-swipes-nasa-shuttle-feed/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for When good toys go bad VI: baby monitor swipes NASA shuttle feed</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on When good toys go bad VI: baby monitor swipes NASA shuttle feed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/when-good-toys-go-bad-vi-baby-monitor-swipes-nasa-shuttle-feed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/when-good-toys-go-bad-vi-baby-monitor-swipes-nasa-shuttle-feed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good going BAD???  I'd say this is a case of  "when good toys go better"!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2007 2:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on When good toys go bad VI: baby monitor swipes NASA shuttle feed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/when-good-toys-go-bad-vi-baby-monitor-swipes-nasa-shuttle-feed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/when-good-toys-go-bad-vi-baby-monitor-swipes-nasa-shuttle-feed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I also don't see why this was bad / unexpected.  it isn't like there is some sekret krypt0 or spread-spectrum-mixed-with-white-noise goofyness to the NASA transmissions - no secret here that they've had a long history of armature radio involvement.  They're probably using one of the standard video frequencies and its probably not uncommon for other devices to pick it up.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RijilV]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2007 3:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on When good toys go bad VI: baby monitor swipes NASA shuttle feed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/when-good-toys-go-bad-vi-baby-monitor-swipes-nasa-shuttle-feed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/when-good-toys-go-bad-vi-baby-monitor-swipes-nasa-shuttle-feed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I suppose if you're busy watching the Atlantis mission whilst your baby is dying in a cot, it's pretty bad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LordPaul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2007 5:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on When good toys go bad VI: baby monitor swipes NASA shuttle feed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/when-good-toys-go-bad-vi-baby-monitor-swipes-nasa-shuttle-feed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/when-good-toys-go-bad-vi-baby-monitor-swipes-nasa-shuttle-feed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Come on people. This is so obvious.<br><br>Baby monitors and wireless video devices all use the same limited set of frequencies. It is extremly likely that a neighbor of this family probably has a C band satellite receiver to get NASA TV (since most US cable companies don't want to carry this free channel). He then is probably using the wireless video link to send the NASA TV to his TV in another room of his house. The family should be lucky he wasn't watching porn.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2007 8:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on When good toys go bad VI: baby monitor swipes NASA shuttle feed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/when-good-toys-go-bad-vi-baby-monitor-swipes-nasa-shuttle-feed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/when-good-toys-go-bad-vi-baby-monitor-swipes-nasa-shuttle-feed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Easy explaination:<br><br>NASA has a TV program (that is, they syndicate their material on public access channels throughout the country). Very frequently, they have things like the crew in the cabin doing work at 0g, and it's very boring. Sometimes it's better, but not usually. It's likely that a public access broadcast was transmitted nearby on a UHF/VHF (i don't know the dif. but OLD SCHOOL) that was somehow picked up on a 900mhz (or 1.2 or 2.4 ghz) wireless receiver...WHICH IS POSSIBLE TO DO.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Lankford]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2007 10:07AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
