http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/ Engadget Comments for Joost evaluating its hardware options http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 18th 2007 9:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 18th 2007 9:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 18th 2007 9:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 18th 2007 9:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 18th 2007 9:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/
Corrected.
]]>Jun 18th 2007 9:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 18th 2007 9:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 18th 2007 11:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/www.lost.eu/534d3]]>Jun 19th 2007 5:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/
anyway, i have invites if anyone would like to check it out. hit me up at andrew aatt harrison dott org.]]>Jun 18th 2007 9:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/
Apple TV needs Joost.]]>Jun 18th 2007 10:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/
This will break the cable and network monopoly on TV. Just like we have more bloggers or Internet radio channels than we can follow, we will have that many TV broadcasts available to us at good quality.]]>Jun 18th 2007 10:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 18th 2007 10:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/akijikan = consumers

Joost is DoA until it has compelling content. It's a nice idea but I was bored within minutes.

-p-]]>Jun 18th 2007 11:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/
it's terrible. your analyses are crap, and your articles are boring.

10 stupid jokes for people new to technology? stupid is right. i don't know who would consider these jokes, let alone funny ones.

A letter to steve jobs? alrighty then, at least you had something to aim for. pity the things you talk about are boring and off the mark.

stop spamming engadget with your crappy blog. or at the very least, only spam once you have something worth reading.]]>Jun 18th 2007 10:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Unless your HDTV is running 1080p, the average computer LCD has a higher resolution than the average HDTV. As such, Joost running on a 720p HDTV will look about the same as Joost running on a 1280x800 LCD ... *and* you'll be sitting at least 10 feet away from it.

(hint: any computer display running at 1280x800 or higher *is* an HD display)]]>Jun 18th 2007 10:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/
http://www.carltonbale.com/2006/11/1080p-does-matter/]]>Jun 18th 2007 11:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 19th 2007 2:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 19th 2007 2:26AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/The network/p2p community likely to be created by Joost will quickly enable new content to be added. And please DO remember that it's still a beta version. Although I agree it is pretty boring for the moment, you have to think about the concept itself. What if all the programs available on your TV/Cable/and-so-on were all available no matter what time it is ?

Ok, I see some of you are quite reluctant to Joost because of its *currently limited content* but please try to see a little bit further than your very limited beta-user experience !

And by the way, was Skype as powerful as it is now when the beta was launched ? I don't think one can create Kazaa, then Skype and then fail with Joost. (and no, I ain't working for them :)
]]>Jun 19th 2007 4:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/
Might be a slow start, but I think this thing will go viral...]]>Jun 19th 2007 5:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 19th 2007 5:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 19th 2007 5:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 19th 2007 5:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/
I would not be surprised if Joost teams up with the Cisco-Scientific Atlanta team to go on their boxes (in addition to some kind Linksys piece of the puzzle).

]]>Jun 19th 2007 9:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Babelgum would be decent if it were cross-platform. Some small playback issues aside (and it *is* in beta) Joost runs really well on my Macbook and had content I enjoy. Ben Stiller Show, anyone?

TiVo needs to get Joost in on the TiVoCast feature (I mean, at least Joost has *some* content).]]>Jun 19th 2007 3:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/18/joost-evaluating-its-hardware-options/Jun 19th 2007 4:12PM