<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[I appreciate the concern which is been rose. The things need to be sorted out because it’s not about the individual but it can be with everyone.<br><br>mls]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daviddock84]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 3rd 2009 6:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[Go to their site and look at the sample shots.  Although it's a very novel idea, the execution is, well, severely lacking... ie:  the resulting picture looks like shit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Susilo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 30th 2007 9:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, the pictures look like crap.. and presumably they chose their best photos to post on the website..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[srw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 30th 2007 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[ Interesting, maybe not perfect at the moment but I'm sure they gonna work on it. I wonder when we can expect it in Europe? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maca]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 30th 2007 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[U-m...<br>It's just like a Toy ?! I cannot use it on business. <br>I'm usually using 360OneVR (Kaidan corp.), and I can hardly use it (because the usage is very limited).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Akila Ninomiya@QTVR Diary]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 30th 2007 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[I take a lot of panoramic shots the old fashion way .... and looking the images on their site I'll keep doing it that way I can't believe their trying to sell this thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 30th 2007 2:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[Okay, upon further examination, it looks like the thing has a 3MP CMOS sensor, but the results are utterly craptastic.<br><br>I remember someone else putting out a similar attachable lens for the old Nikon Coolpix 900s a few years ago.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TIMMAH!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 2nd 2007 12:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great idea, but seriously a 1MP sensor?  I'd love one for nice panoramas that you could actually print.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TIMMAH!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 1st 2007 11:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[Okay, upon further examination, it looks like the thing has a 3MP CMOS sensor, but the results are utterly craptastic.<br><br>I remember someone else putting out a similar attachable lens for the old Nikon Coolpix 900s a few years ago.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TIMMAH!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 2nd 2007 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[Okay, upon further examination, it looks like the thing has a 3MP CMOS sensor, but the results are utterly craptastic.<br><br>I remember someone else putting out a similar attachable lens for the old Nikon Coolpix 900s a few years ago.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TIMMAH!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 2nd 2007 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[Craptastic. I like that, it's kind of like a stretchy type of crap that goes all the way from poor to really shit (which sums up all the comments on our images). Firstly, Maca seems to be the only enlightened individual making comments, in that all images captured have been done so with a working prototype, which uses a bottom of the basket 3MPix CMOS sensor. We have used the same technology with high-end CCD to acquire much better shots but don't want to raise people's expectations as to what we can achieve with a $149 product. In a way, BubbleScope is like a toy, as it opens up immersive VR imaging by making it playful and accessible. That said, we will not be bringing the product to market given the current set-up and we will strive to lift image quality up from the floor. The final product is a few month's off and I wanted to gauge general reaction on the blog underworld before making final changes to the specification. Therefore, I really appreciate the honesty of feedback I have found here. We'll work on it!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Lawton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 2nd 2007 4:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is an interesting little gadget. I can't see myself getting one just yet though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pandaSmore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 2nd 2007 4:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cool.  I've been hoping a product like this would come along.  I think the image quality is fine for a novelty item, but I won't pay $149 for a toy of that quality.  I would pay $49 though, but that's about it.  I suppose the price will drop in time... I would much prefer to spend between $300 and $400 on unit offering 6-7MPs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gatwick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 3rd 2007 10:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BubbleScope promises simple 360 degree photography]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/bubblescope-promises-simple-360-degree-photography/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would definitely get one if they can get the pictures to look better. I'd rather get a $350 decent panoramic camera than waste my money on a $150 toy. If the trade off for the convenience of a getting a quick 360 picture is grainy pictures and blurry images, I'd rather spend $50 on panoramic software and use my 7 megapixel the old fashion way, or get a mirror attachment. If you are going to take a 360 picture of your recent European tour, at least do it right, or at least decently. Please improve the pictures, and I would buy one!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 3rd 2007 5:31AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
