<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for FCC approves Samsung SGH-T639, T-Mobile's first 3G phone?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/05/fcc-approves-samsung-shg-t639-t-mobiles-first-3g-phone/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for FCC approves Samsung SGH-T639, T-Mobile's first 3G phone?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FCC approves Samsung SGH-T639, T-Mobile's first 3G phone?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/05/fcc-approves-samsung-shg-t639-t-mobiles-first-3g-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/05/fcc-approves-samsung-shg-t639-t-mobiles-first-3g-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can we clarify on whether you mean the N90 or the E90 concerning the link?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[carcomptoy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2007 2:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FCC approves Samsung SGH-T639, T-Mobile's first 3G phone?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/05/fcc-approves-samsung-shg-t639-t-mobiles-first-3g-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/05/fcc-approves-samsung-shg-t639-t-mobiles-first-3g-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[none of our training material for this phone suggests 3g capability....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nick fulp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2007 10:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FCC approves Samsung SGH-T639, T-Mobile's first 3G phone?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/05/fcc-approves-samsung-shg-t639-t-mobiles-first-3g-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/05/fcc-approves-samsung-shg-t639-t-mobiles-first-3g-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[T-Mobile is the BEST!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominican Republic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2007 3:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FCC approves Samsung SGH-T639, T-Mobile's first 3G phone?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/05/fcc-approves-samsung-shg-t639-t-mobiles-first-3g-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/05/fcc-approves-samsung-shg-t639-t-mobiles-first-3g-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[w/e. they only have reception in more populated area. if you go out the city they have no service, only Verizon and ATT has reception. i like T-Mobile's plans but getting signal is more important. T-Mobile never have a good looking phone and their phones are overpriced ex. SIDEKICK. that phone was $350 when it came out and Verizon Wireless enV was $150 with more applications. I don't think their 3G network is going to work that good, for example, ATT's 3G had some problems. Why would you say T-Mobile is the best? all i know that they have only around 20 millions customers. Verizon and ATT has over 55 million customers in the U.S. each. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Novey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 13th 2007 1:40AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
