<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[damn you can really go on for a while i couldnt finish]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Salem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 4:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[watch less tv, read a book.  idiocracy is a documentary.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[injate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're doing it wrong. tl;dr.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ssuk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 5:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's what she said]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elias]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 5:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[They'll be here all weekend folks, big hand.<br><br>Try the veal!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 10:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[hahah thanks strider you guys crack me up]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Salem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 19th 2007 12:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[I feel like I just got bait and switched. It started out talking about YouTube and then turned into an Apple commercial, then some boring crap and I just couldn't finish reading it. Bah.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zarniwoop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 4:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[Really?  It mentioned Apple once... <br><br>Anyway, I know it's the height of lazy, but I'd rather watch anything on my couch than at my desk chair, risking carpel tunnel, but only if the interface is as user-friendly and dynamic as that of a PC (TiVo's is a good example).  And when those pipes widen, we'll all want to take advantage of our sweet 50" 1080i's.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jshields44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 5:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah...nice way to give me a headache]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[derek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 4:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not really. Most of them are just short clips. Not something I would enjoy sitting on the couch for. <br><br>Plus the fact that they're already low quality doesn't make them any more enjoyable on your TV.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[I barely enjoy watching you-tube videos on the PC.  There are some entertaining videos on there and it is kind of neat to see user generated content, but for the majority of the videos the quality is so terrible that I cant stand to watch it in the 5" box on my monitor, let alone full screen.  I couldn't even imagine how bad they would look on a decent sized tv.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[claude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 4:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree totally with you. Youtube used to have some really awesome stuff. People used to have truly inspiring and hilarious videos.<br>Now it's all political or video blogging or the same goddamn sports clip submitted by 10 different people and somehow ALL getting on the most viewed page, anime episodes that have been cut into 3 pieces or some stupid MTV music video, some stupid video that is using a stolen video to advertise their own site.<br>The quality has seriously turned to crap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grey Acumen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 10:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[If I sit down on a coach in front of a big screen, I expect to see a solid video content: a professional movie, news or sports. I can't imagine myself relaxing on the sofa and browsing tons of crappy home videos from YouTube on a big TV, regardless of the quality.<br><br>Methinks, YouTube and similar services are like forums, they exist to spend boring time in the office, or to get distracted from boring college homework.<br><br>IMHO, YouTube will always remain a thing for a "laptop browser". There are much better content to watch on a big screen (including game consoles), so here I agree with Jeremy Toeman.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Electromodo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 5:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[youtube is little more than 3min entertainment. i can't really see the desire to turn it into some everpresent video output on all varieties of screens. there are other distribution methods being developed that suit this purpose much much better. let joost get out of beta and be sold to someone big like google and THEN you've got real ipTV. hell, even stage6 is leaps and bounds beyond youtube.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bachus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 5:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[have you seen _current tv? ive watched it on my friends directv and its pretty much what youre talking about. users create content and upload it (high quality i might ad) then other users in the community rate them and the clips with the highest ratings get shown on the tv. its really neat because essentially anyone can get any message or story across to millions. you should check it out.<br><br>btw @ Zarniwoop<br>   since when is using the word 'apple' three times in an article make it an apple commercial? that is 3 out of exactly 1,193 words, 1 utterance for every 398, or 0.25146689019279128248113998323554% of the final composition.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christapher]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 5:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA["since when is using the word 'apple' three times in an article make it an apple commercial?"<br><br>Here is the funny thing about words; what matters is WHAT they say, not how many times they say it. When you say something like,<br><br>"Excepting the Apple TV, not one of these solutions is what you might call elegant"<br><br>you really do end up sounding a bit like a commercial. It wouldn't even matter if you only mentioned Apple once. If that one mention is in a sentence that says that Apple is better than anyone else in the world, then it sounds a bit more like ad copy than serious journalism. Especially since Apple's solution to the problem doesn't particularly differ from anyone else's solution to the problem, and as such isn't really any more "elegant" than anything else out there. Any time you have the typical Engadget spin where putting an Apple logo on something automatically makes it more elegant, well thought out, beautiful, fun, and easy to use, it comes off like an add.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L. M. Lloyd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 6:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[There is a fix to YouTube. It's called Stage 6. If only YouTube videos were on there. stage6.divx.com<br> You can actually view DVD quality video on there AND the videos download as fast as your connection can handle. If you forget about the content of YouTube and compare the two sites, YouTube pales in comparison.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy K.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 5:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[totally agree. google needs to buy up stage6 and integrate it's encoding/decoding functions into youtube. the end product would be amazing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bachus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 5:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[Veoh is a pretty viable solution too, esp. for anime and feature length content, with the advent of 10mb+ broadband, films are minutes away on your tv in good divx or H264 Q, roll on the future]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 7:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[Google Video was actually made using DivX Networks technologies, it was announced in some official press releases back then that Google has partnered with DivX Networks. You will find the DivX versions of every single Google Video when you use the Download for Windows/Mac feature. If you are accessing it from a Windows/Mac it downloads the little .gvp file which is associated with the Google Video Player if you have that one installed. From a Linux machine you will be downloading the .avi automatically because Google hasen't made a Google Video Player for Linux yet. This Google Video Download format is at the resolution of 480x360 for 4:3 aspect ratio content and 480x272 for 16:9 content. And I'm not sure about the bitrate but I don't think it is very much.<br><br>Stage6.com is better than Google Video's quality because that one works with up to high definition resolution and no limit in Bandwidth. I wonder if Google is planning to add this DivX quality to all Youtube videos, I wonder if Google and Youtube has kept all the original files that were uploaded by all the users during the past couple of years on their services, if they have kept them, then they could re-encode better resolution, better bitrate and release those using the Mpeg4 DivX codec which would be suitable for the lean back couch set-top-box experience.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charbax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 19th 2007 12:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah because I REALLY want the already shitty YouTube quality videos blown up to fit on my screen...<br><br>Yeah.. that'll rock...<br><br>(no, it really won't)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Iam9376]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 5:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed. And those of us with decent-sized monitors and high resolutions already know the pain.<br><br>I'm on a 22" widescreen at the moment; at the office I've got dual 22s (haha, sounds like I'm talking about rims on a car) and they're all run at max-resolution.<br><br>I have to literally- lean IN to watch youtube videos on the flash 'widget' on the page. If I want to sit comfortably I have to make them full-screen, which is a BAAAADDD idea. Pixelated beyond belief.<br><br>It's a mixed bag. People want their entertaining entertainment, then they want their _real_ entertainment. Youtube fits in the first category. The latest MGM/Touchstone/Paramount/Disney film, the most recent episode of your favorite primetime show, and bootlegged copies of both of the above apply to the second category.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 6:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[or you could build an HTC for your friend and put 2 video cards in it (1 ATI single head and 1 Matrox quad head) and help him hook it up to 4 19in and 1 72in monitors. <br><a href="http://www.eternal-champions.com/images/den_football_madness.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.eternal-champions.com/images/den_football_madness.jpg</a><br>YouTube x 5 (or 4 Youtube and 1 PornTube in the middle ;^) Now thats entertainment!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankenstein Black]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 6:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[One thing that should be noted is due to Apple's h.264 initiative, the youtube vids that have been converted to watch on your APTV are SIGNIFICANTLY improved quality, they're not just transcoding the FLV in most cases, they're reencoding from the original raw files. As a result, the experience is greatly improved. Now, it won't really be a complete experience until EVERYTHING is re-encoded this fall, and hopefully simultaneous live h.264/flv encoding for every new movie that's uploaded, but for now it is VERY watchable on even my 42" HD plasma. <br><br>h.264 really IS the greatest codec going today.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 6:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[i dont know what the hell everyone here is talking about. the internet IS coming to the TV. just because Youtube doesnt measure up like some others ( stage 6 ) doesnt mean we should forget the whole thing. <br> The fact that I can go to a website and choose from a long list of programs that actually intrest me than someting that i'm just watching because its on the box is a big deal. <br> The quality might suck now , but a lot of these online video sites are doing DVD quality so its a non-issue. It's just a matter of time.. like a year or something.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 6:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[Some very relevant points, the author's main mistake is to mix 2-foot/10-foot with lean-forward and lean-backward. They're related, but they're not synonymous.<br><br>In fact a perfect example of a well-implemented cross-interface is TiVo. It is (or can be) very much a lean-forward activity but is presented attractively and more importantly, functionally in a clean 10-foot interface.<br><br>AppleTV unfortunately was not created as elegantly and it suffers, like many other devices that try to bring lean-forward to the 10-foot domain.<br><br>I don't write for anyone or contribute weekly columns, but I'm available for consulting work.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruno]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[That was an excellent article.  Inspiring actually.  Very astute to point out that the youtube experience is far more than just the content, but the content mixed up with the mechanism for delivery.  It's also a guilty pleasure.  It's what you do to procrastinate from doing something else.  It's also the quick escape when you get a link.  TV is anti-social.  It's not community driven.  Sitting on a couch, I want to be engulfed in entertainment.  I want to be immersed in engaging passive consumption.  The internet requires interaction, action and thought; albeit sometimes stupid thought, you have to continually choose your path of interaction.  <br><br>A laptop can substitute for a television; but only when a substitute is required (airplane, road trip, sitting long hours on an Ikea chair in your bedroom until your children finally fall asleep).  It's a convenience.  <br><br>And the thought of channel surfing on TV is almost a thing of the past.  You only watch what you want to watch when you want to watch it.  If you want to channel surf, you head over to youtube and play the game.<br><br>There may be a convergence in the future, but it won't just be figuring out the technicalities of getting the content to the couch dweller; somehow the experience itself has to be tuned in and turned on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 8:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[What will happen is that Comcast, Time Warner, or Verizon will put up a video upload site or partner with an existing one.  They then will make these videos available on their VOD portal where you can view it on a set top box through their service.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2007 9:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[i love engadget but I always feel there distain for the ps3, its blatently obvious when Im reading articles like this and wii opera, xbox360 are mentioned, iTV, but not ps3? Ps3 plays utube great and other videostreaming websites, why is this totally overlooked? anything positive about the ps3 always seems to be shot down or not mentioned, anything negative seems to be highlighted here. Im just wondering if its only me who notices this anti-sony, anti-playstation vibe I get from engadget. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Unboring]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 19th 2007 2:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[SageTV already has Google Video and YouTube support.  For those that don't know, SageTV is like Windows Media Center but without DRM hassles and many more features.  It's not as convenient for finding videos as using a browser, but if you know what you want, it's pretty easy to find it.  The quality.. well it's YouTube.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 19th 2007 8:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[Unboring, I agree with you. Engadget editors are lazy kids who spend all day playing Xbox. Anyway, I've said this on this site before content shifting is here what you're saying is not revolutionary. If you roll up all the video content you want using Yahoo Pipes, Pull it down to a DLNA capable NAS like Dlink DNS-323 (DLNA is enabled using Twonky) connected to your router on a 1GB ethernet connection, your PS3 which is DLNA capable will pick up any content you're syndicating. Tvtonic and tversity are great for that. I've said it before. Programme guides and IPTV are stupid stuff. The future is RSS Feeds. Only a lateral thinker will get this not a dumb Engadget editor and Apple biggot. In anycase it's here on our PS3. Alright, firmware 2.0 of PS3 will make it accesssible to the common man. RSS is a platform and Yahoo Pipes is an great example of how to use it. <a href="http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.info?_id=AN2vgK8e3BGiaYyXy6ky6g" rel="nofollow">http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.info?_id=AN2vgK8e3BGiaYyXy6ky6g</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[poseidongroove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 19th 2007 6:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good article. I agree that while people in front of TV like some interactivity, they largely want to be entertained, watch content in a more passive than an active manner. There is a service called moowee.tv available for the Wii which attempts to do this. It pulls video content from the Internet in the form of channels which are created by the community of users.  Instead of cherry picking videos to watch, you just watch channels created by others which interest you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 19th 2007 10:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[Talking about lean-forward/back, the PS3 is a good example of bad design. The font size in the main interface, and in the store is WAY too small, and cannot be changed (as far as I can tell). It is lean-forward design in what should be a lean-back environment.<br><br>The 360 has a perfect font size within its interface, viewable from even the furthest couch. I really wish Sony would at least offer an option to increase the size.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2007 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[this show me that you dont really know anything. (never actually USED a ps3 eh?)<br><br>were not talking about dashboards here, were talking about media capabilities.<br>The browser font CAN be changed. anyone who owns a PS3 can tell you that... as well as being able to zoom into any page you visit (which is actually VERY functional compared to the 360's brow.... oh thats right...)<br><br>Tversity, nero home, wmp11 all stream to my PS3 perfectly as well.<br><br>Lets not forget we can always "Lean Back" after <br>booting up Linux, set our resolution to whatever, and continue "leaning back" as we dont need to head back to the PC in the other room"<br><br>man sony really screwed up with their design there huh?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KiraXD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2007 2:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually I bought a PS3 in the first week it was out, and it has mostly been collecting dust underneath my TV. Also, did you even read my comment? I didn't say anything about the browser, I was talking about the MAIN interface and the STORE. Both of which you cannot increase the font size, as far as I know. I'm a PS3 owner, and I have to squint and come close to the TV to read the damn thing, and this is in 1080i.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2007 12:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[See my niggas don't dance,<br>See we just pull up the pants and,<br>Do the Roc-a-way.<br><br>Now lean back, lean back, lean back, lean back.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2007 2:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[How now earn $revenue cow?  MSO's will $pay to carry the channel?  Monthly client $subscription? Interstitial $advertsing?  Hey, it ain't for free unless Google needs a write off!<br><br>Vin De Bona & Bob Saget should get royalties!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shelly Jacobs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2007 8:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[While some the points are correct, you still missed a very important point. User generated content is not profitable to the user. So there will never really be any reason to do any quality control. Cameras are hardly gonna be HD, so the videos will always be low quality. One big reason is also the pipes are not equal, I have a 15/2 internet connection, witch makes sure that i download more than i upload. I cant imagine uploading a HD video to you tube in a timely manner, even at that speed (600m/hr). Then theres the big question is if people made a contribution, then it should be released under a gpl esque license that assures no one is making a killing from someone else's work. Its only fair, were talking about paid subscriptions that give you access to you tube, or someone else's videos. Get it YOU tube]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[missingxtension]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 23rd 2007 12:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[AppleTV is the one that DOESN'T suffer from this problem, as YouTube is in the process of recoding its entire library in h.264, and in SIGNIFICANTLY higher quality. YouTube on APTV is tremendous, the only problem is the selection is extremely limited. I'm hoping once they go fully live in the fall, they will also be doing live encoding of everything.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoshi Likes Boys]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2007 12:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/18/ins-and-outs-does-youtube-fit-on-the-boob-tube/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wrong. (Television) programming  works for sit down television may work as part of evening relaxation, but it is far more likely that social practices will follow technological developments as they have so consistently done so in the past. This is not blind marxism but the observation that television in it's programmed form is limmited in it's appeal to those who are at rest. The previous limmitations of technology in light of current developments, were an important element of the creation of the couch-potato subculture, but as ever with changing lifestyles and increasing political literacy (one might refer in abstraction to the increasing use of the french half of our language) habits will change with stimuli.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IAGray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 28th 2007 7:29AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>