<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think he's right...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 10:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[The real question is; Should you blame the company with the patent policies, or the patent office that allows it? Legal is legal, in my book. Good for them, for making the most (legally) that they can out of the system as it currently is.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BananaBoat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 10:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ballmer hu-aackbur! Ballmer hu-aackbur!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AlexP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 10:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sun is still around?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Wilson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 10:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like that everyone is using the word "terrorism" now for everything.  It weakens it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 10:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 26th 2007 1:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're just being a word terrorist, and also a grammar Nazis, and a punctuation fascist! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PJK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 26th 2007 7:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[If Microsoft is guilty of patent terrorism, Apple must be the patent Hitler waging a patent war. Just saying that Apple attacks anybody who comes within a hair of their patents. Nobody gets spared, from small Chinese companies to charities. No doubt MS might be guilty but some people turn a blind eye to the real criminals. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[3rdsun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 11:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just shut up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Miles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 26th 2007 1:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[Microsoft are Patent Terrorists.<br>Apple are Nazis.<br>The Linux guys are Commies.<br>Sun are.... ummm...  19th Century Ottoman Turks?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[emjoi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 26th 2007 1:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA["Nobody gets spared, from small Chinese companies to charities."<br>I'd believe you... if I didn't see loads of iPod knockoffs while I was in China. The best part- these small Chinese companies usually have an inside link to government people, while Apple apparently doesn't.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 26th 2007 5:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[MILES HAS SPOKEN!!<br><br>The world is now a safer place.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[johnnyg0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 26th 2007 8:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol godwins law^^,  but then again M$ is somewhat controlling]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 11:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think Godwin's Law needs to be revamped to include the term terrorism.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 26th 2007 1:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CE-Oh no he didn't! Part XLI: Sun's James Eagleton says Microsoft guilty of "patent terrorism"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/25/ce-oh-no-he-didnt-part-xli-suns-james-eagleton-says-microso/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't get worked up. Eagleton uses the phrase, "loosely described as patent terrorism", so the comparison is not particularly strong. <br><br>The reason he is making these comments is because part of Sun's strategy around open source software is that they provide indemnification for customers, meaning that if someone like Microsoft files a patent suit, customers will not be held liable for infringement. This is a big deal for large customers making big investments in infrastructure.<br><br>This story is just a reminder to Sun's bread-and-butter enterprise customers that open source software from Sun is "safer" than open source software from other providers or which was just downloaded off the 'net. Nothing to see here, move along.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[evo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 26th 2007 4:01AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
