<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/panasonics-hdc-sx5-and-hdc-sd5-3ccd-avchd-camcorders-again/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/panasonics-hdc-sx5-and-hdc-sd5-3ccd-avchd-camcorders-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/panasonics-hdc-sx5-and-hdc-sd5-3ccd-avchd-camcorders-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[From what I can understand, this means full 1080p recording.  Finally!<br><br>1080p, 3CCD's, SDHC, OIS, small form factor, good looks... I'm liking the SD5.  Now I know what to ask for when the holidays come around. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Z]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2007 7:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/panasonics-hdc-sx5-and-hdc-sd5-3ccd-avchd-camcorders-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/panasonics-hdc-sx5-and-hdc-sd5-3ccd-avchd-camcorders-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yawn.  The miserable bitrate limitation of this camcorder (and most on the market) means that footage will be heavily artifact-laden.  The Canon HV20 remains the easy winner.  Read some reviews.  Save a few hundred dollars.  Get a better picture.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Asterra]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2007 8:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/panasonics-hdc-sx5-and-hdc-sd5-3ccd-avchd-camcorders-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/panasonics-hdc-sx5-and-hdc-sd5-3ccd-avchd-camcorders-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[The difference between this camera and the previous SD-1 isn't 1080p, it's true 1080i. The SD1 actually records 1440x1080 instead of the "true HD" resolution of 1920x1080. But it's still "i". The wouldn't get 133 minutes of HD on an 8GB card if it were P.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[raswirsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2007 10:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/panasonics-hdc-sx5-and-hdc-sd5-3ccd-avchd-camcorders-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/panasonics-hdc-sx5-and-hdc-sd5-3ccd-avchd-camcorders-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not so sure this justifies the increased price tag.  The HDC-SD1 is only $789 on Amazon, dropping in price everyday, and it is by far adequate for anyone's needs.<br><br><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000LO92EK/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-1270725-5344636?tag=freeplefav-20&%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000LO92EK/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-1270725-5344636?tag=freeplefav-20&%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance</a><br><br>I plan on picking myself up one soon, with a $65 8GB SDHC card from Newegg.  1080i is enough for me.  The video looks unbelievable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 31st 2007 3:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/panasonics-hdc-sx5-and-hdc-sd5-3ccd-avchd-camcorders-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/panasonics-hdc-sx5-and-hdc-sd5-3ccd-avchd-camcorders-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, but where was this camera for the Transformers premiers..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 2nd 2007 4:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/panasonics-hdc-sx5-and-hdc-sd5-3ccd-avchd-camcorders-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/panasonics-hdc-sx5-and-hdc-sd5-3ccd-avchd-camcorders-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Here are the specs:<br><a href="http://panasonic.co.jp/pavc/global/videocamera/hd/global/products/hdc-sd5/specifications.html" rel="nofollow">http://panasonic.co.jp/pavc/global/videocamera/hd/global/products/hdc-sd5/specifications.html</a><br><br>What I don't get is how do you get 1080x1920 (2,073,600 pixels) from "520,000 effective pixels"??? (which is roughly one fourth of 1080x1920).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 2nd 2007 11:29PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>