<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Verizon Wireless to buy Rural Cellular for $2.67 billion</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/verizon-wireless-to-buy-rural-cellular-for-2-67-billion/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Verizon Wireless to buy Rural Cellular for $2.67 billion</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to buy Rural Cellular for $2.67 billion]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/verizon-wireless-to-buy-rural-cellular-for-2-67-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/verizon-wireless-to-buy-rural-cellular-for-2-67-billion/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well this is long overdue.  Verizon misses out on a lot of potential rural users because their network just doesn't go there quite often.  While this won't help me (I live in rural Northern California) it is a step in the right direction.  Here's hoping they expand more into rural areas so we have other choices than AT&T.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[whoster69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2007 2:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to buy Rural Cellular for $2.67 billion]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/verizon-wireless-to-buy-rural-cellular-for-2-67-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/verizon-wireless-to-buy-rural-cellular-for-2-67-billion/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is actually very interesting for Vermont.  Verizon has always had great coverage in the major cities, but disappointing coverage in most of the state.  Unicel has always had great coverage, but they're local, so their nationwide plans were somewhat iffy.  I would have expected them to be bought by AT&T giving them an immediate presence in Vermont.  Instead all the Unicel customers will be converted over to CDMA, having to replace the hardware they have.  If they add CDMA to all the existing towers that Unicel has we'll finally have decent coverage in Vermont!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CruiSin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2007 2:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to buy Rural Cellular for $2.67 billion]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/verizon-wireless-to-buy-rural-cellular-for-2-67-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/verizon-wireless-to-buy-rural-cellular-for-2-67-billion/</guid><description><![CDATA[Vermont has always had CDMA coverage for Verizon through US Cellular's roaming agreement.  All this does is guarantees that the choices in ME NH VT will be CDMA or... CDMA.. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Droo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2007 3:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to buy Rural Cellular for $2.67 billion]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/verizon-wireless-to-buy-rural-cellular-for-2-67-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/verizon-wireless-to-buy-rural-cellular-for-2-67-billion/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't believe this. Why in the hell would Sean Connery not be in the new Indiana Jones movie. Dammit!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[med1320]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2007 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to buy Rural Cellular for $2.67 billion]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/verizon-wireless-to-buy-rural-cellular-for-2-67-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/verizon-wireless-to-buy-rural-cellular-for-2-67-billion/</guid><description><![CDATA[C'mon, I can just see the commericials:<br><br>America's number network just got better.<br><br>Or<br><br>[In a pastoral setting] Can you hear me now? <br>*cocky smile* Of course you can.<br>----------<br>Hey, VZW can't have all the fun, since it's keeping some of the network to have GSM, "other GSM carrier[s]" can claim, their networks got better, too. It's a win/win situation, no?....well, besides those Rural Cellular customers who fancied their GSM coverage.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[derX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2007 7:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to buy Rural Cellular for $2.67 billion]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/verizon-wireless-to-buy-rural-cellular-for-2-67-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/30/verizon-wireless-to-buy-rural-cellular-for-2-67-billion/</guid><description><![CDATA[Unicel just spent a lot of money in the last few years to convert their GSM customers from TDMA.  Now yet again they'll be dragged into another 'next generation network'.  However, this time around, they don't get to keep their 50$ unlimited phone plans, or their free incoming messages, or their free incoming minutes.  They get told instead 50$ gets them 900 minutes.<br><br>It's a HUGE difference not just in platform, but the fact that the GOOD plans for rural folks will go away, along with probably several hundred jobs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Droo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2007 7:23PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
