http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/ Engadget Comments for Intel's Wolfdale processor gets benchmarked http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/
Are there any comparisons in terms of heat and power consumption out there?]]>Aug 8th 2007 8:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/Aug 8th 2007 10:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/Aug 8th 2007 10:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/Aug 8th 2007 9:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/
Right now Intel is the best, based on performance and benchmarks. I recently built my dream machine using one of Intel's 1066 FSB processors (the ones that were just outdated a few weeks ago with the 1333 FSB processors). The speed difference between the two when using the same clock speed is averaged at 1% which is obviously not a reason to upgrade from the semi-latest processors.

The new 45 mm architecture is a worthy upgrade though and the processors are expected to pass 3.0 GHz (just a few weeks ago 2.6 GHz was the top-of-the-line Core 2 Duo when excluding the $1000 extreme chips).

My plans are to keep what I have and then after a few months, over clock it to the maximum potential with air cooling. At some point I will upgrade my motherboard and all the things inside (Ram, graphics, etc.) but the current technology and the 45 mm technology isn't worth doing that after I just got done building a 'then powerful' machine, considering that I can overclock.

I hope this helps someone in their own research.
]]>Aug 8th 2007 9:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/Aug 8th 2007 10:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/
Wow, at this rate, we might someday get chips under the size of a football field!]]>Aug 8th 2007 11:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/Aug 8th 2007 9:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/Aug 8th 2007 10:25AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/Aug 8th 2007 2:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/Aug 8th 2007 2:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/Aug 8th 2007 8:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/Aug 8th 2007 12:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/my pentium 4 is 2.33GHz and it blows]]>Aug 8th 2007 1:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/
Also, your p4 is netburst, which sucks.]]>Aug 8th 2007 2:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/Aug 9th 2007 1:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/and if my shitty processor has the same GHz how can i tell that this one is better? thx in advance]]>Aug 10th 2007 2:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/08/intels-wolfdale-processor-gets-benchmarked/
Rank me low. kthnxbye]]>Aug 8th 2007 2:32PM