<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Canon's PowerShot SD870 and SD950 IS Digital ELPHs pack the pixels</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/20/canons-powershot-sd870-and-sd950-is-digital-elphs-pack-the-pixe/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Canon's PowerShot SD870 and SD950 IS Digital ELPHs pack the pixels</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's PowerShot SD870 and SD950 IS Digital ELPHs pack the pixels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/20/canons-powershot-sd870-and-sd950-is-digital-elphs-pack-the-pixe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/20/canons-powershot-sd870-and-sd950-is-digital-elphs-pack-the-pixe/</guid><description><![CDATA[12.1 megapixels? I guess this will help sell the camera to people who have no clue the lens will probably never deliver a sharp enough image to the sensor to warrant even 8 megapixels (not just because of the lens quality, but also because of imperfect focus, camera shake, etc.). Oh well, lots of noise and poor low-light performance is a small price to pay for the ability to market a lot of pixels.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 12th 2007 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's PowerShot SD870 and SD950 IS Digital ELPHs pack the pixels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/20/canons-powershot-sd870-and-sd950-is-digital-elphs-pack-the-pixe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/20/canons-powershot-sd870-and-sd950-is-digital-elphs-pack-the-pixe/</guid><description><![CDATA[All im asking is widescreen and least 10x zoom , like the Lumix TZ3.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Manuel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2007 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's PowerShot SD870 and SD950 IS Digital ELPHs pack the pixels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/20/canons-powershot-sd870-and-sd950-is-digital-elphs-pack-the-pixe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/20/canons-powershot-sd870-and-sd950-is-digital-elphs-pack-the-pixe/</guid><description><![CDATA[Even more megapixels on that little sensor? Man, my SD800IS is already borderline on low-light functionality; I can't imagine how much worse these models are going to be. This isn't going to end well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 21st 2007 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's PowerShot SD870 and SD950 IS Digital ELPHs pack the pixels]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/20/canons-powershot-sd870-and-sd950-is-digital-elphs-pack-the-pixe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/20/canons-powershot-sd870-and-sd950-is-digital-elphs-pack-the-pixe/</guid><description><![CDATA[TC, actually it has a larger 1/1.7" sensor compared to the old 1/2.5".<br><br>I think it will be better than the SD800IS (which isn't as good as the SD700)<br><br>Cheers]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aussie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 10th 2007 7:43AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
