<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Via's one-watt Eden processor gets official</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Via's one-watt Eden processor gets official</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via's one-watt Eden processor gets official]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow, could they make a 1.5ghz with a .5 watt? That could result in UMPC that last 48 hours on a charge.(with 5inch and less screens)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JPQsat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 23rd 2007 4:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via's one-watt Eden processor gets official]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Check their site. I believe the 1.5GHz (fastest) version needs 7w if I remember correctly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lattyware]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 23rd 2007 5:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via's one-watt Eden processor gets official]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is the processor completely fanless, with a heatsink being optional? Or is it required to have a heatsink?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[me]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 23rd 2007 4:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via's one-watt Eden processor gets official]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Since it's using only one watt it doesnt have energy to dissipate so it wont get hot, it's one par with the Xcale cpu you can find in pda...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ayle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 23rd 2007 4:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via's one-watt Eden processor gets official]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[VIA is really starting to get my attention. They beat out similarly specked CPUs at a cycle per clock basis PLUS they're heat dissipation is practically nothing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daran]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 23rd 2007 5:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via's one-watt Eden processor gets official]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Taiwan, Taipei!<br><br>Got rice, B ?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[got rice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 23rd 2007 6:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via's one-watt Eden processor gets official]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[i wonder how much faster it would get if they went to a 65 nanometer process?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Huehuecoyotl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 23rd 2007 11:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via's one-watt Eden processor gets official]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[It wouldn't get any faster, however the smaller process would reduce overall power consumption.<br><br>Only speed gain from a smaller processing size would be the ability to fit more transistors in the same size package.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Iam9376]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 24th 2007 3:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via's one-watt Eden processor gets official]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Call me stupid, but watt is the point of having a chip so small them attaching it to a backplate that big for connection purposes? Surely if the chips innards were spread out over the size of the backplate then cooling would be a no-brainer]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 24th 2007 4:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Via's one-watt Eden processor gets official]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/vias-one-watt-eden-processor-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[ALLRIGHT!!!<br>Now lets get 4 of these in a UMPC and have a QUAD CORE under 5 watt of power.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MonteVale]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 24th 2007 4:18PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
