<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Acer to aquire Gateway to aquire Packard Bell BV?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ilh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 12:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bell has a big hold on england and the immediate area of europe ;)<br><br>It's a pretty dirty trick i have to say, but it makes great business sense.<br><br>Acer gains a foothold in america by getting gateway (consumers are more likely to go with a gateway, one of the three major brands (Dell, HP/Compaq being the other two) that consumers identify as making 'good' computers, than an Acer, practically a no-name when it comes to consumer computers, additionally it stands to gain in the corporate world with what little gateway has there.) and england by getting Bell (i know little about england, but i know Packard Bell isn't doing too bad and is pumping out decent computers too.<br><br>This of course will hurt Lenovo, they wanted at Bell (hinting at the fact that Bell is a worthy acquisition).<br><br>After the smoke clears this might be good, gateway may not have the best computers, but they do have a name, something acer does not (at least in america). As long as they don't do something stupid (like re-name gateway) acer should reap the benifits of gateway's good name.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paragraph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 1:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Last I heard Acer was the 3rd largest seller of notebook computers, ahead of Gateway. Only beaten by HP and Dell.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[speedyrulz8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 4:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[i'm most surprised to find that both gateway and packard bell still exist!<br><br>my first compy was a packard bell 386dx!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dmitry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[ROFR apparently does not equal a ROFL WOFL. :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tehpwnmstr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 1:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[I honestly didn't even know packard bell still existed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Killian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Man,  Gateway, Emachines, Packard Bell, and ACER?  All of them becoming one?  Watch out Dell,  looks like you have an old crappy computer with a shiny paint job heading your way to take some market share.  I was really hoping that I would never hear the word "emachine" ever again.  I shutter at the sound of their power supplies going out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aztechmanager]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[*shudder*  jeeze I hate spelling]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yimmy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 1:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's like a Katamari Damacy situation, except with horrible computers rather than just random crap.  <br><br>-----<br>Ron<br><a href="http://www.flektor-blog.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.flektor-blog.com</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hollywood Ron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 1:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Packardmari Dumbasshi?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daedalus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess when you flush enough crap into the market, some of it's going to get on user shoes.  We already know it rolls downhill, so I guess it also plops on desks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hollywood Ron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 2:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Packard Bell, diamond-in-the-rough?  lmao<br><br>That's a good one]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 2:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed... I've never once heard of a packard bell being anything better than a door stop.  The fact that a tech news site such as engadget would post something saying that p-bell is a diamond in the ruff gives me serious concerns as to who is approving the articles around here!  In my experience, eMachines isn't much better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DJKRAZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.sarcasmsociety.com/howtobesarcastic/lessonone.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.sarcasmsociety.com/howtobesarcastic/lessonone.php</a><br><br>Sarcasm is a wonderful thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 3:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[If they were trying to be sarcastic, they should have put diamond-in-the-rough in quotes, to indicate that or used some other method.  I would hope they weren't implying that the company known as Packard Bell is worth anything more than the screws holding their POS computers together.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 4:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually back in the distant day, say mid 80s they were a contender. Then CompuAdd pretty much took them out and was in turn put out of business by mail order and overinvestment in brick and mortar stores. Gateway was the high horse in the early to mid 90s and then Dell. Just because a brand is no name in the US does not mean it does not have some mojo elsewhere in the world.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Cartwright]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 7:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Packard Bell has a reputation here in the US, it's just a bad one.  I hope that the computers they sold over seas wasn't the junk that we got over here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 28th 2007 2:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish I could understand why something called a "Right of Refusal" meant that they wanted to acquire something. Usually the word refusal means "DO NOT WANT".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iliarules]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 3:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[it means you have the right to be the first to refuse to bid on a sale. i.e if I rent your house, and you want to sell it, many cities give the renter the right of first refusal, meaning I can pay you the asking price and get the house. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Froggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 4:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bet the acer execs are sitting in the corporate headquarters, looking at a chart that shows the major manufacturers of sub-par computers, and under the chart it just says "OM NOM NOM"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[so Acer is looking for a Gateway to Packard Bell? (hehehe... uhh.. lame)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Froggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 4:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gah! I have some ACER products..Laptop, Monitors etc. I LOVE them so far..great price with no Prob's - Hope that dosen't change....(Have had nothing but trouble with Gateway AND my old Packard Bell PCs...)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Schmidt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 4:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[gateway is not acquiring packard bell.  it's acer that's acquiring gateway.<br><br><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Taiwan-Acer-Gateway.html?ref=business" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Taiwan-Acer-Gateway.html?ref=business</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[speedballz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 5:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Gateway plans to acquire Packard Bell BV]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/gateway-plans-to-acquire-packard-bell-bv/</guid><description><![CDATA[@speedballz.<br><br>Gateway is exercising it's right to first refusal. This means they get first dibs on purchasing PB. I do not think it is a buy 1 to get another deal, but more of a Global footprint? I read the following article today about the deal.<br><br><a href="http://mytechdirect.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=1046" rel="nofollow">http://mytechdirect.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=1046</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Too Bad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 11:59PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>