<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Kodak's new trio of EasyShare cams courtesy of Google cache</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/kodaks-trio-of-new-easyshare-cams-courtesy-of-google-cache/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Kodak's new trio of EasyShare cams courtesy of Google cache</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's new trio of EasyShare cams courtesy of Google cache]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/kodaks-trio-of-new-easyshare-cams-courtesy-of-google-cache/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/kodaks-trio-of-new-easyshare-cams-courtesy-of-google-cache/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, I find the fact that somebody spent time looking for new Kodak cameras on google cache more compelling than the actual news.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andyo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 29th 2007 8:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's new trio of EasyShare cams courtesy of Google cache]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/kodaks-trio-of-new-easyshare-cams-courtesy-of-google-cache/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/kodaks-trio-of-new-easyshare-cams-courtesy-of-google-cache/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why bother wanting to know release dates and price on Kodak crud?  It's gonna be overly cheap to snatch consumers who think it's the best value for 12mp and a super high ISO.  Knowing Kodak, it will be noisy even at ISO 200, and blurry and dark if ever used indoors.  The Z812 could turn out ok, if it isn't plagued with problems like the Z712, and is built to last more then 6 months.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 8:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's new trio of EasyShare cams courtesy of Google cache]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/kodaks-trio-of-new-easyshare-cams-courtesy-of-google-cache/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/kodaks-trio-of-new-easyshare-cams-courtesy-of-google-cache/</guid><description><![CDATA[I always hear the same things about Kodak...I don't know...I was going to buy the EasyShare Z1275 but I changed my mind!<br><br>now thinking of the Cyber-Shot T100 or W200, or waiting for the T200.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pentium]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 9:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's new trio of EasyShare cams courtesy of Google cache]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/kodaks-trio-of-new-easyshare-cams-courtesy-of-google-cache/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/kodaks-trio-of-new-easyshare-cams-courtesy-of-google-cache/</guid><description><![CDATA[Coming from Rochester, NY and having a dad that has worked 25+ years in R&D at Kodak (fortunately avoiding every round of layoffs), I'm kinda obligated to cheer for the home team.  Kodak still has a long way to go to convince the tech savvy that their products can make the grade foreign companies seem to be setting as the standard.  I'm perplexed, however, that they would release any new mid- to hight-end products without image stabilization.  I can't tell you (anything that you don't already know) how important that is, especially as digital and optical zooms become stronger  and more important to consumers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[karmaghost]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 11:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's new trio of EasyShare cams courtesy of Google cache]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/kodaks-trio-of-new-easyshare-cams-courtesy-of-google-cache/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/kodaks-trio-of-new-easyshare-cams-courtesy-of-google-cache/</guid><description><![CDATA[You have to admit though that the prices on those Easyshare cameras are quite compelling<br><br><a href="http://www.pixideal.ca/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage.tpl&product_id=3209&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.pixideal.ca/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage.tpl&product_id=3209&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=1</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerald]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2007 12:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's new trio of EasyShare cams courtesy of Google cache]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/kodaks-trio-of-new-easyshare-cams-courtesy-of-google-cache/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/27/kodaks-trio-of-new-easyshare-cams-courtesy-of-google-cache/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm confused. The article says "...while packing optical image stabilization..." and then 5-lines later states "Both lack any kind of optical image stabilization...". Which is it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 28th 2007 11:37AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
