<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Nikon's Coolpix frenzy continues with L14, L15, S700, and S510</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/30/nikons-coolpix-frenzy-continues-with-l14-l15-s700-and-s510/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Nikon's Coolpix frenzy continues with L14, L15, S700, and S510</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon's Coolpix frenzy continues with L14, L15, S700, and S510]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/30/nikons-coolpix-frenzy-continues-with-l14-l15-s700-and-s510/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/30/nikons-coolpix-frenzy-continues-with-l14-l15-s700-and-s510/</guid><description><![CDATA[what, no viewfinders?  is canon gonna become the manufacturer of toy-grade digicams?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rtdunham]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 30th 2007 9:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon's Coolpix frenzy continues with L14, L15, S700, and S510]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/30/nikons-coolpix-frenzy-continues-with-l14-l15-s700-and-s510/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/30/nikons-coolpix-frenzy-continues-with-l14-l15-s700-and-s510/</guid><description><![CDATA[??? view finders ???  Who uses view finders in compact digital cameras nowadays?  Most new digicompact cameras are without view finders...  By-the-way, the S500 is really really fast when I checked it out last weekend.  They claim it is the fastest in it's kind.  Fast, super compact and very functional... options, options, options. <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mojoJP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2007 7:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon's Coolpix frenzy continues with L14, L15, S700, and S510]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/30/nikons-coolpix-frenzy-continues-with-l14-l15-s700-and-s510/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/30/nikons-coolpix-frenzy-continues-with-l14-l15-s700-and-s510/</guid><description><![CDATA[??? view finders ??? Who uses view finders in compact digital cameras nowadays? Most new digicompact cameras are without view finders... <br><br>who?  anyone who realizes a camera can be held much more steadily in an elbows-tucked, camera-to-the-eye position than in an arms-extended-in-order-to-view-an-LCD position.  it's pretty common knowledge and many sites advise to use the optical viewfinder when sharpness is particularly critical, or in low-light situations where slow shutter speeds will be used.  the WSJ's Walt Mossberg has complained about the diminishing number of models with optical view finders for this very reason, though as these models show, he's not had a lot of impact.  <br><br>the problem is that manufacturers know they can cut costs and perhaps reduce size by eliminating the feature, because too many uninformed buyers don't know why the absence matters.  <br><br>fwiw:  Canon's SD800-IS still has the optical viewfinder AND one of the widest-angle focal length zoom lenses* of any compact/pocket digital camera, making it an excellent choice.  My hope is that if/when canon refreshes that wide-angle model it'll retain the optical viewfinder.<br><br>terry<br>*--so why's the wide-angle feature matter?  a couple of examples:  a) it makes for great scenic shots outdoors; b) indoors, you can capture much more of a full-room view; c) on flash shots, you can capture the same image area--say a group of people--from a closer position, allowing the flash to better illuminate the scene than if you had to back farther away "to get everyone in the picture"; d) there's greater depth-of-field at wider focal lengths, so for closeups, for example, where there's often a very narrow field of focus, more of your subject will be sharp if you shoot at the widest focal length.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rtdunham]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2007 11:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon's Coolpix frenzy continues with L14, L15, S700, and S510]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/30/nikons-coolpix-frenzy-continues-with-l14-l15-s700-and-s510/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/30/nikons-coolpix-frenzy-continues-with-l14-l15-s700-and-s510/</guid><description><![CDATA[one other advantage to optical viewfinders, mentioned by a laptopmag.com review of canon's SD900:<br><br>"Canon included an optical viewfinder, which is nice if you prefer to ... save on battery life ... "]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rtdunham]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 31st 2007 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon's Coolpix frenzy continues with L14, L15, S700, and S510]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/30/nikons-coolpix-frenzy-continues-with-l14-l15-s700-and-s510/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/30/nikons-coolpix-frenzy-continues-with-l14-l15-s700-and-s510/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good price points on the L14 and L15. Time for an upgrade from my aging Powershot.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[granny down east]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 30th 2007 1:40PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>