<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[SWEET]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolant8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 9:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[OMG]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 10:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[HAWT]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod Munch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 10:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[But will it play Doom. LOL.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 10:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, and how...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thijs Haenen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 2nd 2007 11:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[WILL you STOP with the doom question, its really not original or funny any more. It will play doom, though as it's in the  professional fireGL series, it's suppose to be used for Extreme high end OpenGL rendering, not that much focused on DirectX apps, so gaming on it will not quite as impressive, this card is made for Doing, not for Gaming.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolant8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 11:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[@coolant8 <br><br>Doom I & II ran on DOS and DOOM III ran on OpenGL, All three iterations had zero involvement with DX; so yes It would run DOOM. But let me ask you this: Why play DOOM when you can Play Counter Strike,  Will it run CS?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[I LOVE THE CAPS LOCK KEY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thats a nice looking assembly.  Is that a water cooled unit, or just fan cooled?  Anybody hear any whisperings on a price yet?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's only a fan. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 12:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh well.  A guy can dream (or modify :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 12:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[1 GB version of the 2900xt based ATi 1Gb FireGL V7350 PCI-Express  Card costs like £859.95 GBP, with 2 gb? probably upwards 1000 GBP.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolant8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 12:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[ATi 1Gb FireGL V7350 Card costs like £859.95 GBP with out tax, £1,010.44 inc.VAT, if this is like the FireGL V7350, but with extra ram, it will be  more expensive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolant8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 12:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[Neither ways, nVidia's Quadro FX5600 with 1.5 GB of ram will still outclass this the same way as 8800 series outclassed 2900XT]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolant8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 1st 2007 12:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA["nVidia's Quadro FX5600 with 1.5 GB of ram will still outclass this the same way as 8800 series outclassed 2900XT"<br><br>not really necessary. <a href="http://www.dailytech.com/ATI+Radeon+HD+2900+XT+Performance+Benchmarks/article7043.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailytech.com/ATI+Radeon+HD+2900+XT+Performance+Benchmarks/article7043.htm</a>,<br>well it seems Firegl version will be much faster than Quadro.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gescom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 2nd 2007 5:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[You are truely clueless.<br><br>With a new upcoming driver for a 2600XT FireGL card can reach the last-gen Quadro 5500.<br><br>And this is a 2900XT, with 4 times the memory bandwidth (512-bit) and 320 stream procs. (2.5 times of 2600XTs)<br><br><br>IIRC the 5600 doesn't have a 2x lead over the 5500 = FRIED.<br>Doesn't help that the 5600/4600 have only 384-bit busses and less raw computational power than the 2900- bottlenecks found in gaming benchmarks (that marred the 2900) don't count here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikeo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 2nd 2007 7:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[OH, I'm I...R600 merely merely look good on the spec sheet, in actuality, R600 does not bypass 640MB version of 8800 GTS with its 512 bit bandwidth in contrast to 384, 512 bit counts for nothing if the actual GPU architecture is inefficient. beside, on your spec sheet, if you up the res, add in filters, R600's raw power vanishes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolant8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 2nd 2007 11:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.mvktech.net/content/view/3701/38/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mvktech.net/content/view/3701/38/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolant8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 2nd 2007 11:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[ATi's professional drivers have always been inferior, FX5600 has already been out for alot longer than 2900, with much more refined performance, AS DirectX 10 brings on unified shader architecture, who says that G80's raw performance can't be serval times faster than G71?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolant8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 2nd 2007 12:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[On top of your "never exceeding 640MB GTS" is bullshit.<br>In gaming, yes; professional apps, nein.<br><br>SpecView relies heavily on raw computational power and bandwidth, 2 traits where 2900XT in GDDR3 already wins the 8800GTS/Quadro 5600. <br><br>As for efficiency, since there is no MSAA involved (only line AA) 2900XT takes none of the performance hit it has in games where it's forced to do shader MSAA- even in games, without MSAA you can see the 2900XT approaching the 8800GTX.<br><br>With the wider pipe, more power and AMD getting their drivers right (they already have) the FireGL of this generation is actually returning the favor from Quadros.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikeo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 2nd 2007 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[Approaching the 8800GTX, maybe, not beating it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolant8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 2nd 2007 12:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[you run this card on your 32bit vista with 4gb of RAM and all of the sudden you have less than 2GB ram left b/c windows has to address remaining 2gb for the video card plus other small things.<br>so for designer or cad professional less than 2gb available memory is not enough. maybe with x64 windows this card will be good but still many apps dont run on x64 windows (installers for apps themselves especially)<br>again i might be wrong about all this]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rejus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 2nd 2007 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Diamond planning HD 2900 XT-based 2GB VFX 2000 pro GPU?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/diamond-planning-hd-2900-xt-based-2gb-vfx-2000-pro-gpu/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm just excited to see the Diamond name on a graphics product again! Huzzah!<br><br>Now make a replacement for the Diamond Monster Sound. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cmdwedge]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 2nd 2007 8:11PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
