http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/ Engadget Comments for IBM researchers get closer to nanotech hard drives http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 3:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 4th 2007 12:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 4:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 4:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 5:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 7:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 5:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 5:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 5:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 2nd 2007 12:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 5:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 8:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 11:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 5:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/IBM's Millipede = 1TB / in^2. kthx]]>Sep 1st 2007 6:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 6:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 6:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 2nd 2007 12:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/
Sometimes I'm very glad to have been born in this lifetime.]]>Sep 1st 2007 6:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/
Does that mean the rest of the time you regret it?]]>Sep 1st 2007 10:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 1st 2007 10:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 2nd 2007 3:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/
Plus they are talking about switches, so it is getting into microprocessor territory, not just harddrive territory.]]>Sep 2nd 2007 9:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/01/ibm-researchers-get-closer-to-nanotech-hard-drives/Sep 4th 2007 1:03AM