<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[Comment]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 12:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[Reply]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[a boy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 12:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[Fail.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paloooz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 12:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[A request a seperate tear-down on that battery. Because it's possible.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[a boy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[one thing i've been wanting to know is if the hardware is still there to output video via the headphone jack and the crippling is simply a software issue... or if the hardware is missing and it wouldn't be possible to fix with a software update]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 12:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm waiting for tom to blend them all together...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple are complete bastages for making battery replacement a nightmare]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xavier Gill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[But will it blend?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[idiot... haven't u seen that episode? of course it blends... dUH! :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ew! Atleast get a manicure, use a hand-model or clean under your fingernails before taking any pictures of holding anything!!!<br><br>So much for, "Me first to net, last to wash!". ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HineyWipe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 1:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[did your zune break?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Killian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[I use a creative zen vision M which is above and beyond the zune or your precious iTurd. Its just frustrating seeing how much BS crap about Apple products in posted on this blog. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 1:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[We don't forget about iRiver.<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Magallanes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 2:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[My question is about the screen. They didn't switch to a more scratch resistant material, like the glass on the iphone, did they?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SoBossy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 3:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[I didnt know that there was a 6g classic?!?!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BlakeMan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 3:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[i'm a idiot i thought they meant 6gb not 6 gen]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BlakeMan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well don't iPods cover 70 percent of the mp3 player market or something like that? If it's the most popular MP3 player, shouldn't they try to have the most coverage on it? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Macdonald]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[The dimensions on the battery look the same as on the 5g, which would mean that it also works on the Zune. Supposedly it allows for 40 hrs of music playback, so it must have higher mah capicity. Where do they sell the batteries for the 6g classic, I'd love to have 40 hrs of playback on a hdd-based mp3 player.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Diego]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 4:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't like Apple or any of its products but I enjoy reading about the components that are used in a new iteration of its players.  I like reading about the changes to any popular product, and it's not as though the article is taking time to say how blessed we are for this new Apple product.  Your choice of MP3 player may well be better, but this is pretty relevant for a lot of people.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2007 7:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[I doubt the same battery would power an HDD based player for the same duration it powers a flash memory based player.  One of the advantages of using flash memory is lower power consumption.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marlon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 8:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Double iPod dissection: 3G nano, 6G classic go under the knife]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/11/double-ipod-dissection-3g-nano-6g-classic-go-under-the-knife/</guid><description><![CDATA[But the iPod Classic with 160 GB....... how does that work??? Do they have 2,5 inch instead of 1,8 inch hard disc ?????]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebastian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 4:37AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>