http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/ Engadget Comments for Lenovo launches 22-inch WUXGA ThinkVision L220x http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/that is a sweet monitor, but huge as shit]]>Sep 17th 2007 8:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/Sep 17th 2007 8:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/
And don't try to use progressive lenses. Get single vision lenses designed for the distance you normally sit from the monitor (or would if you weren't squinting and leaning in at at). This is farther out that a typical "reading" prescription, so don't ask your optometrist for reading glasses - give them the actual distance to the monitor in a comfortable sitting position.

I see so many people who have never needed glasses before and don't want to admit that their eyes are aging. I was there once, but getting proper vision correction made all the difference. Now I prefer much higher pixel densities. My ThinkPad has a 15" UXGA (1600x1200) display, with 133 pixels per inch, and it's just perfect.

I also have a nice NEC S-IPS monitor with a 20" 1600x1200 resolution, or 100 pixels per inch - and those pixels seem a bit coarse to me. That's just about the same pixel density as the new Lenovo - at 22" and 1920x1200, it has 103 pixels per inch. With proper vision correction, you should have no problem at all using a display like this.]]>Sep 18th 2007 1:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/Sep 18th 2007 2:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/Sep 18th 2007 2:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/Sep 17th 2007 8:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/Sep 17th 2007 8:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/
[After googling] You can actually buy a Thinkpad with that resolution on a 15.4" LCD.]]>Sep 17th 2007 8:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/Sep 17th 2007 9:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/
That's nonsense. No other manufacturer has a WUSXGA 22" monitor. All 22" monitors are WSXGA = 1680x1050. I've always thought this was a stupid resolution - 200 more pixels in width and 30 more pixels in height and you'd have 1080i/p HD resolution.]]>Sep 18th 2007 5:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/Sep 18th 2007 2:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/
Move along.]]>Sep 17th 2007 8:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/Sep 17th 2007 9:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/Sep 17th 2007 9:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/Sep 17th 2007 9:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/Sep 17th 2007 9:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/
Judging by the response time and viewing angle, this monitor uses AT LEAST an MVA panel. 24" monitors in the $500 range are usually TN.]]>Sep 17th 2007 9:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/Sep 17th 2007 10:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/
Using a 22" at WSXGA was always too low anyway

]]>Sep 18th 2007 3:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/ ]]>Sep 18th 2007 8:26AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/17/lenovo-launches-22-inch-wuxga-thinkvision-l220x/Nov 13th 2007 4:29PM