http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/ Engadget Comments for Intel researchers give robotic hands more sense http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/Pretty interesting though]]>Sep 18th 2007 12:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/Sep 18th 2007 12:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/
uh...?]]>Sep 18th 2007 12:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/Sep 18th 2007 1:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/
CLAP CLAP

Kill yourself.]]>Sep 18th 2007 1:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/Edit/Delete Message]]>Sep 18th 2007 5:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/
Wait a second... this isn't Slashdot!]]>Sep 18th 2007 3:25AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/
i always thought force-feedback was the way to go. put a bunch of little pressure-sensors around the gripping surface, so that the arm 'knows' how hard it's squeezing. couple that with a powerglove-like remote control that increases squeeze resistance in response (ferrofluid? gear control?), and you've got yourself something for delicate remote handling. or the start of a gundam.]]>Sep 18th 2007 4:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/Sep 18th 2007 3:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/http://robot.gmc.ulaval.ca/en/research/theme303.html]]>Sep 18th 2007 4:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/Sep 18th 2007 10:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/intel-researchers-give-robotic-hands-more-sense/The whole thing was more than just the hand, but we did incorporate this idea of not crushing stuff into the design. My point: there are better ways to go about doing this.]]>Sep 24th 2007 10:29AM