<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</guid><description><![CDATA[nano is the new black]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[peterskruger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 9:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</guid><description><![CDATA[This just in! It will be ready and available to use by the time the Touch gets enough capacity that it becomes usable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 10:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nano, Nano...Mork and Mindy anyone?<br><br>This is cool.  Put the power of an Xbox or PS3 in a hand-held one day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 10:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</guid><description><![CDATA[Robin Williams is the original gangster.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Hilario]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 2:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</guid><description><![CDATA[damn it...takin back the ipod touch now..XD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Halpert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 11:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</guid><description><![CDATA[why take the iTouch back?  it'll probably be broke by the time this hits the market where you could afford it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 11:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, it has the "potential", but it'll be like every other tech that "promises" "revolutionizing" the industry, and it will fade into the distance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stephen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 1:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</guid><description><![CDATA[The neat thing about "100,000 year" claims is that it's IMPOSSIBLE TO CONFIRM.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</guid><description><![CDATA[do you know how memory works. a charge in a certain area represents a binary 1 no charge represents 0 they can watch how fast the 1 degrades to a 0 then work out how long data will last]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 1:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ahh but do you know how the shift key works?  This memory will change the way we play Doom forever!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GazzyC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 2:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, actually I don't know how memory works. Thank you for enlightening me. :-) I still question the accuracy of the hundred thousand year claim... but it is nice to know that they can at least estimate it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 2:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</guid><description><![CDATA[According to the article the system uses 'extremely low power consumption for data encoding - 0.7mW per bit'.   So how much power does it take to write 1MB?  8388608 bits x 0.7E-3W = 5.9kW!  I've got a feeling the device would probably pop long before 6MW squeezes into 1GB.  Please tell me the author of the article messed up!<br><br>Write speed and longevity sound great, but otherwise call us when you've got the 'extremely low power consumption' down a few orders of magnitude, U Penn dude.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nanowires developed to retrieve data on the double]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/18/nanowires-developed-to-retrieve-data-on-the-double/</guid><description><![CDATA[The article says that write operations take only 50 nanoseconds to complete. Some quick math:<br><br>0.7 mW/bit * 1 bit * 50 ns = 0,000000000035 joules = 0.035 nanojoules.<br><br>In other words, writing a single bit takes very little energy. So lets see how much energy it would take to write a whole gigabyte:<br><br>0.035 nJ * 8 * 1024^3 = 300647710.72 nJ = 0.3 J.<br><br>So with just one joule of energy, you could write over 3 gigabytes of data. Of course, if you tried to write all those bits simultaneously, the peak power requirement would be huge. <br><br>Anyway, a modern hard drive consumes something like 10 Watts (10 joules per second) during write operations. The difference between that and this new tech is incredible.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oddity]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 19th 2007 9:40AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>