<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Canon introduces the REALiS X700 and SX7 projectors</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/20/canon-introduces-the-realis-x700-and-sx7-projectors/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Canon introduces the REALiS X700 and SX7 projectors</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon introduces the REALiS X700 and SX7 projectors]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/20/canon-introduces-the-realis-x700-and-sx7-projectors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/20/canon-introduces-the-realis-x700-and-sx7-projectors/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't understand why all projectors fail to standardize on either 1280 or 1920 pixels wide.  1440 in all practical respects is useless, whereas the other two are natively HD-no pixel streching required.  These things are not CRTs, and native resolution is a huge deal.<br><br>There really isn't a reason why this could not be done.  Any wisdom out there?  The "for presentations" argument is bogus - 1280 and 1920 work just as well, and laptops' native resolutions fail to matter when the VGA-out is enabled (for instance, my D610 has a native rez of 1024x768, but can output any resolution up to 2048 pixels wide using the VGA).  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Warner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 20th 2007 2:05PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>