<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[3x zoom? That's so yesterday, people want 6 times or more. <br>And 3 times includes wide so in reality it's more realistic to say 2 times zoom, which is meager really.<br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2007 9:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah and they act like "megapixels" really matters. You can have a 100 Megapixels and it wont make a diffrence. Its the size of the chip those megapixels are aligned on. Too many megapixels on a small chip just causes more noise and static with color  bleeding over to other pixels...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John M]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2007 9:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[John M, it's only like 7.2 megapixels.... when they start putting 11+ on these things then we can start criticizing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clinton Christian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2007 9:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA["to be available in Latin America, Europe and Asia Pacific starting early October."<br><br>No word on a US release. On the 3x zoom, how much more can you go when the camera is "ultra-slim"? I wish they had a side show to show just how slim "ultra-slim" is.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2007 9:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Try 12.5mm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2007 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[OK, fair point on the zoom vs ultra slim thing I guess]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2007 11:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let's play...find the grammatical error in the Engadget article!<br><br>Come on, guys. You should know the difference between "then" and "than". Seriously.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shifuimam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2007 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[How can you advertise a camera as "ultra slim" and not put a side profile image of it? Terrible.<br><br><a href="http://benq.com/products/digicam/?product=1236&page=gallery" rel="nofollow">http://benq.com/products/digicam/?product=1236&page=gallery</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gfar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2007 12:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[that's the stupidest looking lens configuration i've ever seen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 1st 2007 4:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/benq-intros-the-dc-x735-ultra-slim-camera/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bet its not as slim as the Casio Exilim S770 or S880....<br>17.3mm thick, 2.8-inch screen, 8.1 megapixel, 3x zoom also, and a decent focus assist light.<br><br><a href="http://www.casio-europe.com/euro/exilim/exilimcard/exs770/" rel="nofollow">http://www.casio-europe.com/euro/exilim/exilimcard/exs770/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nonamo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2007 9:07PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>