<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/symbian-to-support-arm-smp-multicore-technology/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/symbian-to-support-arm-smp-multicore-technology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/symbian-to-support-arm-smp-multicore-technology/</guid><description><![CDATA[Symbian keeps on rocking :) in yer face, winmo and castrated osx :))<br><br>I'm waiting for the open source community to pick up on this.. I'd love a device like the HTC touch but with Linux and compiz fusion.. and who wouldn't? :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 4th 2007 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/symbian-to-support-arm-smp-multicore-technology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/symbian-to-support-arm-smp-multicore-technology/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whats the point of having multi-core when Symbians multi-tasking sucks?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PEZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 4th 2007 12:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/symbian-to-support-arm-smp-multicore-technology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/symbian-to-support-arm-smp-multicore-technology/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hehe and you have used Symbian right?<br>Oh waith i know what your gonna say you got N95 and E90 right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PDexter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 4th 2007 1:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/symbian-to-support-arm-smp-multicore-technology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/symbian-to-support-arm-smp-multicore-technology/</guid><description><![CDATA[Compared to what? Symbian is a pretty good OS , its a bit heavy on 'doing it there way'<br>Surely having multicore will only improve its multitasking performance.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[charlie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 4th 2007 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/symbian-to-support-arm-smp-multicore-technology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/symbian-to-support-arm-smp-multicore-technology/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think "stuff" and "Cortex" should be used together in a sentence.  It's too disturbing.<br><br>Symbian doesn't suck, it's the horrible UI software stacked on top of it by SE and Nokia that does.  I'd much rather have a WM device without a touchscreen than a Nokia usability abortion.  Apple's device doesn't have to be that good to be better than everything else.  The bar is really that low.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[craig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 4th 2007 2:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/symbian-to-support-arm-smp-multicore-technology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/symbian-to-support-arm-smp-multicore-technology/</guid><description><![CDATA[isn't a symbian those things that girls sit on?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Hilario]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 4th 2007 5:31PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>