<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[Congrats Engadget, you didnt turn this into an Apple post. Good job!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GoreTEX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 10:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, how could the iPhone not be mentioned in an Engadget post on a mobile device? Haha]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paolo90]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 11:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[Correct. That's amazingly boring.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 10:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like it. I'd consider getting one if it was around $1000.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DickHardknocks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 10:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>woo hoo! smaller everything, and I'll betcha the price has increased.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Malfunction]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 10:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[No Bluetooth, and short on RAM. If they released a version with WiMax and Bluetooth, plus the ability to go up to 2gb of RAM, that would be killer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erwos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 10:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[well atleast it...slides]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kozzi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 12:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bluetooth and Wimax?<br><br>I swear, people just insist on things in their devices nowadays just to say they have them. I don't know anyone who actually uses the bluetooth in their mobile devices, people are always asking me how to turn it off because its running their batteries dead, and even if you did, what the hell would you use it for? Especially on this device, do you really need to sync your contacts or use a headset? Its like insisting on having an interface like USB, but about half as useful, like parallel. (yes i realize the value of parallel I'm just pointing out it isn't used in mainstream products like it used to be) and how often do you really need to sync contacts? When was the last time you ever even lost your contacts? If your transferring files, great, bluetooth is pretty fantastic for wireless file transfers I must admit, but I doubt theres anything terribly large going between mobiles on a regular basis.<br><br>and WiMax? Wimax isn't even going to be available at a level thats worth throwing money into for years, and by years I mean you wont even own this particular device anymore at that point. I'm sure someones going to post some article about how close we are (I've read them, I'm a network enthusiast) and how wrong I am, but I can tell you with 100% confidence that its not happening next year, or even the next, or even the next after that. Its going to be stuck in major cities (when they finally get it) for awhile, especially since thats a great way to do a little testing before its fully deployed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shibathedog]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 1:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not that I find this device too terribly useful (although its pretty nifty) I'm just saying thats a stupid reason to cause you to decide you definitely don't want to have anything to do with it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shibathedog]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[I use bluetooth all the time on my mobile.  sorry you feel it's a stupid reason to not buy the device, but it'd prevent me from getting it.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wolf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 2:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[I, for one, regularly use bluetooth for all manners of things: Handsfree/headset, laptop tethering, file transfers, navigation (MGMaps w/bluetooth GPS receiver).  Bluetooth with these profiles is _neccessary_ for a higher-end cellular device, whether it is an actual phone or not.  (I don't consider the iPhone a higher-end device, at least technically).<br><br>I agree with you on WiMax.  Before it is even deployed (by Sprint), it already faces competition in the form of LTE (Long Term Evolution, a followup on W-CDMA/UMTS/HSDPA, and a GSMA standard, likely to eventually be deployed by AT&T on their existing frequencies - and also announced by Verizon).   Moreover, the WiMax standard is not even well-defined enough to ensure device compatability yet.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tor Slettnes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 4:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[How did a black man get his hands on the prototype?!?!?!?!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MDB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's thin and white... what did the expect?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MDB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 1:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice.  I think you really meant to post a comment on another site, such as:<br><br><a href="http://www.missouritrailertrash.com/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.missouritrailertrash.com/index.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff P.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[You'd think that they would make a better attempt at reducing the huge gap in between the center keys when the thing is unfolded...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 2:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/10/samsungs-sph-9200-gets-specs-leaked-manual/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why would the gap matter? There's no reaseon to even have them connected to each other even. The keys for your right hand are on the right and for the left hand on the left.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Skon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 13th 2007 8:06AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
