<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Vonage settles long-standing Klausner litigation</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/12/vonage-settles-long-standing-klausner-litigation/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Vonage settles long-standing Klausner litigation</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Vonage settles long-standing Klausner litigation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/12/vonage-settles-long-standing-klausner-litigation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/12/vonage-settles-long-standing-klausner-litigation/</guid><description><![CDATA[Get the feeling that Vonage has something special in their back pocket called prior art? Just one speculation.<br><br>If Vonage plays the prior art card, Vonage would ask for use without further 'infringement' of the patent, and not have to pursue this suit any further. This allows Sprint, Verizon, and Klausner to attack the next Voip provider that pops up, although any prior art Vonage found was never publicly disclosed.<br><br>It sounds like a win-win for Vonage + their accuser, and a loss for the industry in general.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 12th 2007 10:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Vonage settles long-standing Klausner litigation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/12/vonage-settles-long-standing-klausner-litigation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/12/vonage-settles-long-standing-klausner-litigation/</guid><description><![CDATA[IANAL, but if Vonage pulls the Prior Art card, the patent is negated by the USPTO and no one can be sued over the patent again. You can't claim prior art and then not disclose said prior art so you're protected but others can be sued.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon Galbraith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 12th 2007 2:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Vonage settles long-standing Klausner litigation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/12/vonage-settles-long-standing-klausner-litigation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/12/vonage-settles-long-standing-klausner-litigation/</guid><description><![CDATA[Patent problems or nor I like the service I'm getting from Vonage. Here's to finding a way to stay in business.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cagrino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 12th 2007 10:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Vonage settles long-standing Klausner litigation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/12/vonage-settles-long-standing-klausner-litigation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/12/vonage-settles-long-standing-klausner-litigation/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder how this affects Lingo offered by Primus out of Australia.  I've had rhis service for 3 yrs now and just love it.  Cheaper, too.  No, I don't work for them nor own any stock.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Linda Peterson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2007 8:49PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>