<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Casio Exilim EX-V8 reviewed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Casio Exilim EX-V8 reviewed</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio Exilim EX-V8 reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[if only it was a tiny bit thinner. otherwise, seems like my ideal camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[trancer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2007 8:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio Exilim EX-V8 reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry but this is not newsworthy.<br><br>-This P&S is not a particularly innovative camera<br>-This is not the first review, try the washingtonpost or digitalcamerareview<br>-Steves digicams is not the most cool headed camera<br>website; An overwhelming majority of their reviews end on positive<br>notes regardless of the actual faults and pros of the camera itself. <br><br>Other reviews of this shooter(see washingtonpost from 20 days ago) have not been so praising.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2007 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio Exilim EX-V8 reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[The review on the washingtonpost is skimpy and lacks support (charts/ samples/ comparisons).<br>Inferior picture quality? What is he comparing it to? an SLR? If not, then list some camera's in the same price range/feature set that exceed the v8's picture quality.<br><br>For me, its a great overall camera that has some nice and unique features. (widescreen video to name one.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[trancer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2007 8:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio Exilim EX-V8 reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone know the bitrate of this camera's H.264 video? That's the best indicator of the likely video quality, but I'll be damned if I can find that info anywhere. Perhaps that info is too complex/confusing for mere consumers...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LondonConsultant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2007 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio Exilim EX-V8 reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have always really liked the styling and diminutive size of the casio cameras, but have always been a bit disappointed by testshots made with them on you find the net.<br>It's a pity these things never all come together, that is good quality, small size, good features,  not-made-by-sony-bastards.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2007 3:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio Exilim EX-V8 reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[You find on the net*<br>(badly edited my line)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2007 4:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio Exilim EX-V8 reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Im starting to shy away from Canon P&S cams in favor of Casio. I dont like the direction that Canon is taking their designs, with that curved off shit instead of the perfect rectangle straight edge design.<br><br>Also, Casio uses MUCH better video codecs for their movies while Canon is still using the same old technology.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[peestandingup]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2007 5:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio Exilim EX-V8 reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Um, Steve's reviews are not ones to be trusted, he rarely, if ever says anything negative about camera's that he claims to review.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2007 7:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio Exilim EX-V8 reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/22/casio-exilim-ex-v8-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ken Rockwell also recommends Casio this camera.  He is one of the best photographers that I know about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[clevelanddesi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2007 10:16AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
