<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let the warring of fanboys begin...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay B Sauceda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 4:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah lets preview what topics the fanboys will shout about<br>1-Gaming<br>2-iPod vs Zune<br>3-Useless nuh-uh-ing<br><br>am I forgetting anything?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trogdor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 6:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't vote his comment down. That's all this article is. It's meant to get on sites like Digg and drive traffic. Let's face it, the chart isn't exactly unbiased, comprehensive or even well constructed. It's just meant to get people arguing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LegendZ28]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 6:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let the rants from those who spend their time reading fan-boy wars begin.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Gray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 8:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well observed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 8:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Legend:  Because Engadget needs Digg traffic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hollywood Ron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2007 4:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wouldnt gaming be worth more than 1 point? It is worth more so 20 points to many and DX10 wheres that? Either way, the majority of people use microsoft, and there are more vista than leopard users, doesnt this signify that maybe even though its been out longer, that vista is better?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blaine Oliver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2007 6:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[So the jist of what people vote on here is if they like the os someone uses? So i get marked down because i prefer vista? Thats not a clustering for the fuckwit fanboys is it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blaine Oliver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 29th 2007 5:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[-Blaine Oliver<br><br>More people buying Vista is not a sign of more people liking Vista. It's a sign of more people buying Vista.<br>e.g. Someone has 50 Windows apps. They need to upgrade to make sure they don't get left behind. Why would they buy Leopard when they'd have to spend hundreds on new apps?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rationality]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 19th 2008 7:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[first?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 4:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Typing upside down is cool, but is seriously pointless, when its really hard to turn your screen upside down! Only laptop users are gonna be able to read what you say!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Grand Master]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 5:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, unless your like me and can read upside down. Belive me, it is a handy skill to have. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 9:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why would you have to turn your screen upside down to read it? I could read it fine. It's just dumb is all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LegendZ28]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 6:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Turn your screen upside down? wow i dont need to do that but ill give you and advice. turn your computer just 90 degre to the left, and your head 90 degre to the right! i know this is kinda revolutionary, you should try! <br><br>i just notice it also works if you turn the computer to the right and your head to the left awsome!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lolec]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 6:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, as much as I'd like to [generic fanboy response to anything about computers on the web] this is a rather fair comparison.<br><br>To take this chart to the next level, how about including a link to 3rd party (preferably open-source) apps that help compensate for each of the OS' weak points?<br><br>For example, iTheater (on sourceforge) almost makes up for the fact that frontrow is a joke compared to Windows Media Center.<br><br>Or; Windows Photo Gallery isn't as good as iPhoto, but Picasa from Google is pretty dang good, not to mention free 2GB for online photo galleries.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GBot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 9:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmmm. I'm fairly dubious about this comparison because there are still a few basic errors. For instance, why does it list that there are NO automation features in Vista? Yeah, I must have been imagining Windows Scheduler for a long time now, since XP in fact.<br><br>More than anything, a load of the red and green assignments are totally based on opinion, and I'd be concerned that this is presented here (and will be accepted by some) as fact. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MatthewJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2007 9:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[leopard is much better, this chart is a disgrace. Vista should not recieve any type of credit for that POS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2007 12:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ all that upside down talk:<br><br>i'm confused.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2008 4:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[haha....cool comparison. i like it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 4:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Your missing legacy support.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DaMan09]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 5:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Missing the most important;<br>Price!<br>and it should be the price of Ultimate because that's really the only one that support all the compared items]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTitor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 5:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[If price was to be added, couldn't choice be a section as well?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DaMan09]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 5:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Price is important, but MS doesn't charge for Service Packs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 6:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jon: Just because Apple puts out new versions every other year or so doesn't mean that they are "service packs". Windows 2000 is NT 5.0, XP is NT 5.1. MS charged for the .1 upgrade just like apple does.<br><br>It's just that MS are better at hiding their version numbers. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Enils]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 6:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's certainly a comparison, that's for sure. But I'm not sure it's totally fair. They do include iLife apps in this comparison, which doesn't come in the box with Leopard. They overlooked this important fact. Sure, Leopard comes preinstalled on new macs that will also have ilife installed- but you don't get ilife apps when upgrading an old mac to leopard. Thus, they aren't out of the box with Leopard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 7:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA["Price is important, but MS doesn't charge for Service Packs."<br><br>I think it's more of a disappointment that they can't just get it right the first time instead of having to release service packs :|]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2007 12:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[DaMan09, good call, added that in.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with keeping iLife in as part of the operating system's features- you can't get a Mac without it as far as I know. And it really isn't fair to compare price of the two operating systems. Leopard may be "only" $130, but a lot of the features that compare Vista to OS X were added in Tiger. So really, Mac users have spent $260 on operating systems to get the same feature upgrade from XP that Vista does, which- fancy that- is the same price you'd pay for a retail copy of Vista Ultimate.<br>Also: OS X's price is set by Apple. You can shop around and find OEM dealers willing to sell Vista for a lot cheaper than retail.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TopCat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 8:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[But isn't included- IN THE BOX- which they explicitly pointed out as part of this- with Leopard. If you were to upgrade to Leopard, say, with a Macbook purchased earlier in the summer (like my friend) you would have to buy iLife '08 on its own. It is not in the box with Leopard. Sorry, but it just doesn't make sense according to their rules. Oh, and Vista also creates a log for parents- so you can put that under "Parental Controls" or whatever.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 9:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[+ Speech Recognition - I'm kind of thinking however commendable Leopard is with VoiceOVer, I don't Apple gives you Vista's grid controls.<br>+ Frontrow (Note: only on Macs with infrared)<br>+ Speech Synthesis (New Alex voice in Leopard is extremely good, with breathing and natural pacing)<br>+ Preview Files - Leopard Preview 4.0 is so goddamn good, it deserves a leg up. While Adobe is squawking at Microsoft for incorporating PDF controls in Office, apparently they have few problems with letting Apple built-in a fantastic PDF viewer/editor. See AppleInsider "Road to Preview 4.0" feature.<br>+ Preview Files - More points, Quicklook has the potential to put ANYTHING in the "thumbnail" view  as applications add the featture. Does Vista thumbnail PDFs? Quicklook let's you "preview" multiple pages in a PDF without "opening" it. Leopard also lets you create an on the fly list of selected thumbnails over a black background like Expose (quickly comparing different images).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cleverboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2007 5:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ryan Block- <br><br>iLife IS NOT IN THE BOX with Leopard. Therefore, iDVD, iMovie, and iPhoto should be excluded from this chart, like it or not, according to your own rules. My friends macbook, which he just upgraded to Leopard, doesn't have any of the iLife 08 features you include in this comparison. He still needs to buy iLife '08, so in the interest of your own criteria, please take these off of your comparison charts. I'm only saying you should follow the rules you have set for yourself. Follow Logic, man. I do use Vista, and love it, but I agree, Each OS has their own strengths and weaknesses. Just follow your own rules, man. Or at least respond to this in some way that isn't, "Well, it may not be in the box with the OS, as we specified, but it's on new macs, so we're including it." Come on, man. You at least have my Email. Please, justify this properly, or remove any iLife '08 programs from the list. They're your own criteria.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2007 5:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cleverboy<br>Yes, Vista thumbnails PDFs.  Also, any application can install itself as the "Preview/Thumbnail Generator" by adding themselves and the file extension into the registry.  here's how:<br><a href="http://www.danielmoth.com/Blog/2006/12/managed-preview-handlers-for-vista-and.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.danielmoth.com/Blog/2006/12/managed-preview-handlers-for-vista-and.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2007 10:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok, since you don't seem to want to follow your own rules and remove iLife, can you at least do me one thing? Tell me why Vista doesn't get "Integrated" for the Screen Capture category. If you look on a keyboard, there's a button that says "Prt Scrn" (that's short for Print Screen), and if you hit it, you just took a picture of your screen. Then, hit start, type "Paint" and then do this: Ctrl+V. There's your screenshot! If you want an example, here's one:<br><a href="http://i20.tinypic.com/2nsqrcw.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i20.tinypic.com/2nsqrcw.jpg</a><br><br>And yeah, I'll say it again- iLife is not in the box. Sorry, had to.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2007 1:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[how is screen capture not given to windows in this?? On a mac, it's like some 4 key combination you have to press; on windows, the "print screen" key puts it into the clipboard so you can paste it anywhere that can accept the information.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2007 2:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hate to harp on it, but I'm sorta surprised by how unresponsive the editor's being. I mean, really, if you count iLife, you should probably count Office '07, since that comes bundled with most new Vista computers, and is usually preinstalled. That follows the same logic he's using for iLife here, right? So that would give email to Outlook, Text editing to Word, Contacts to Outlook, and Calendar to Outlook. And Tasks to Outlook, too. That would, of course, make Vista the leader by 5, if I'm not mistaken. Please, tell me if I'm wrong. (Not about the math, about the principle:) ) And I'm pretty sure that my Vista install will defrag automatically every Monday morning at 2.30 AM, which sounds like a scheduled task to me.<br><br>And how about a category where updates are considered? I think anyone will agree that Microsoft is much better than Apple's "Surprise!" updates, not to mention a lot more regular. And Windows update is much improved in Vista over XP.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2007 9:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[JD.  ilife does count because every Mac that is sold comes with a complete version of iLife.  It may not be the latest and greatest but you get those apps that can be installed on Leopard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2007 4:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[This thing is screwed.....for example...in the multiple OS support area...Tied?...Whatever!! Give me a frickin' break! Be honest, this is not a tie! A PC cannot run OS X but a Mac can run ALL Operating Systems! Where is the fine print in these areas? <br><br>This is just one area where the author is obviously not mentioning the tie breaking facts. This comparison while OK, is far from perfect....move along nothing to see here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AK Mac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 20th 2007 12:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[-JD<br><br>Include Office 2007?<br>1. Office 2007 is NOT INCLUDED on most PCs. Fact.<br>2. Office 2007 Professional is $500, Ultimate $680, iLife 08 is $79.<br>3. Office 07 vs iLife 08 is stupid. They have nothing to do with each other.<br><br>Just one more thing.<br><br>APPLE: BUY ADOBE!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rationality]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 19th 2008 7:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seems fair. And I don't really like Apple at all, either.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[I of course, am an Apple fan<br>I think that both deserve more credit for things,but even though Vista might be able to do more is some areas, it dosn't count if it is always bluescreaning.<br><br>but yes, I do think this way fair]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[applefreak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 5:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[The bluescreen argument hasn't really been relevant since Windows 98. Get a clue fanboy.. I've been running Tiger side-by-side with Vista for at least 6 months, and I've seen a few kernel panics on OSX, but never a bluescreen on Vista.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 5:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[OS X does not go into kernel panics unless your hardware is faulty. Check your ram and or other parts you might have handled...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Teejay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 5:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Teejay, that's an outright lie. Since buying my Mac in February, I haven't added hardware to it nor have I removed it. I've seen two kernel panics. Thanks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Big John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 6:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[that's not entirely true teejay.  Mine and several other Santa Rosa MBPs that I support were kernal panicing at least once a week while on Airport until Apple repleased new Airport software after the 10.4.10 update. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 6:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Vista has BSOD sooo many times already<br>Ubuntu has only given me trouble when I manually configure xorg<br>Macs are way too expensive]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Zhao]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 6:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[To Mr. Zhao: "Have you seen Mac prices lately, you ignorant fool?" You're stuck in the early nineties with Gil Emilio. Oh, and in general, go to Best Buy and hold Windows+E on any Wintel box for seven seconds and watch your precious Vista crash and burn. Do it on ALL of them at once like I did!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tallest Skil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 7:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA["The bluescreen argument hasn't really been relevant since Windows 98" can you give me your hardware specs so I can the same hardware? my windows crashes all the time. sometimes not even a blue screen just reboots...=(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rokerovakero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 7:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[The only time I've had BSOD's on Vista is when my RAM voltage was set wrong and when I overclocked farther than what my RAM could handle. Both of those were my fault, not Vista's.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[memodude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 7:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[How often does Windows Blue Screen anymore? This is such an OLD complaint. Sometime in the early days or XP or before: but not with current builds of XP and Vista. I'm sure it happens, but it probably happens just as often as Macs shut down prematurely too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaxim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 7:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/leopard-vs-vista-feature-chart-showdown/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ben, everyone has personal anecdotal experience to share. Saying, "Well I haven't seen issues." isn't really going to convince anyone. I mean I had a great Dell laptop for years that never had issues and then I had another after that I returned in 3 months because of numerous problems. So what does that prove? Nothing.<br><br>Big John, Kernel panics only come from 2 sources... a faulty or poorly written kernel extension or faulty hardware. Just because you haven't altered your configuration doesn't mean the former can't be true. Computers can and do ship with faulty parts. Everything in the guts of a machine is volatile and often has flaws. Or maybe you installed some software that uses kexts - Parallels, Fusion, Cisco VPN, are just a few common ones that get too close to the kernel (in my opinion) and can cause issues. I'd check your logs and see where the panic is coming from and try to resolve it. It's not normal at all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Gray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2007 8:56PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>