http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/ Engadget Comments for DXG's DXG-110 gives you 10 megapixels for (well) under $200 http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/
Big numbers sell, though. It is like contrast ratios on LCD screens; there is no distinguishable difference between a 1000:1 and a 10,000:1 contrast ratio on LCDs if you introduce minimal light into a room, such as LED and LCD displays of A/V equipment reflecting off on non-black walls. However, folks are suckers for big numbers.]]>Nov 1st 2007 2:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/Nov 1st 2007 2:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/Nov 1st 2007 3:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/Nov 1st 2007 2:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/]]>Nov 1st 2007 4:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/
I thought the MP race was over... :(]]>Nov 2nd 2007 5:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/Nov 1st 2007 5:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/Nov 1st 2007 8:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/
Slackers!
]]>Nov 5th 2007 8:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/
----------------
Flexible houses]]>Nov 2nd 2007 7:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/]]>Nov 2nd 2007 10:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/

my phone is 1.3 megapixels, i have it down-rezzed to 800x600. my SLR is 2.5 megapixels, more than enough. and my point-and-shoot can do up to 7.1 waterproof and drop-proof, but i down-rezzed it to 2560x1920 because 7.1MP stills eat up memory card space.]]>Nov 2nd 2007 11:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/dxgs-dxg-110-gives-you-10-megapixels-for-well-under-200/
(Check out this site: http://www.popphoto.com/photographynewswire/4939/editors-choice-best-digital-cameras-under-300.html).

And I was also told that all compact digitals with more than 8MP are all bad. Is this true?

]]>Sep 5th 2008 1:30PM