http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/ Engadget Comments for Time names iPhone "Invention Of the Year" http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/Nov 1st 2007 11:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/
And as for iPhone's win this year... it gets a grade of A- for its smooth integration of functions, but a D+ for its missing functionality.]]>Nov 1st 2007 12:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/Nov 1st 2007 1:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/
Cancel Time Magazine subscription.

2 year old tech that doesn't even MMS is innovative?]]>Nov 1st 2007 2:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/
i agree with you 100% Ack...no MMS...no title deserved. there are a thousand other cell phones and devices out there that deserve this title...sure as shit shouldn't be this heap of garbage.]]>Nov 1st 2007 2:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/Nov 1st 2007 3:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/
I'd really like a solid analysis of why this thing is so revolutionary. Apple was not the first to have a touch-screen, WiFi-enabled, media-capable Smartphone. Our device lab has a bunch.]]>Nov 2nd 2007 9:25AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/
Time. If you want, I have a whole drawer full of phones that are older than the iPhone and have more features...you might be interested for next year?

:)


]]>Nov 2nd 2007 4:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/01/time-names-iphone-invention-of-the-year/Reason "3. It will make other phones better" is pure BS.
"AT&T gave Apple unprecedented freedom to build the iPhone to its own specifications."
O RLY?
"Now other phone makers are jealous."
OK...
"They're demanding the same freedoms."
Good luck with that...demands are lovely.
"That means better, more innovative phones for all."
YaY
I liked this comment from further in too:
"The iPhone gets applications like Google Maps out onto the street, where we really need them."
I'm just glad we don't need GPS, 'cause that could be a problem.

Hey, I think it's a cool device and all, just back off on the BS. All full up here.]]>Nov 6th 2007 11:27AM