<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Sony continues to shed chip responsibilities</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Sony continues to shed chip responsibilities</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony continues to shed chip responsibilities]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good decision for Sony.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chino B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2007 5:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony continues to shed chip responsibilities]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's sony?<br><br>oh yeah, it's that company that made those casette-tape players in the 80's. yeah I had one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2007 5:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony continues to shed chip responsibilities]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</guid><description><![CDATA["A move which certainly makes sense"<br><br>A change of pace, Sony? ;)<br><br>I kid, I kid.  It's nice to hear that Sony still knows how to make smart decisions.  I really want them to do well in... whatever market this relates to.  If it's the console market, so much the better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fruition]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2007 6:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony continues to shed chip responsibilities]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone else think it's real weird having your competitors design your chips? I mean, what's stopping them from you know, rigging thangs?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[E71]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2007 8:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony continues to shed chip responsibilities]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</guid><description><![CDATA[Would you buy lemonade from the adorable kids down the street if you found out they pissed in the school bully's drink?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoteriX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2007 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony continues to shed chip responsibilities]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</guid><description><![CDATA[Take it from someone who works on-site where the 32nm development is taking place ... there are no nearby Starbucks stores. There is a Dunkin Donuts, however.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2007 10:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony continues to shed chip responsibilities]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hopewell?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[UoMDeacon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2007 10:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony continues to shed chip responsibilities]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/07/sony-continues-to-shed-chip-responsibilities/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't believe how Engadget managed to skew the article.  Nowhere does the article (from InfoTech) say: "Sony is bailing on at least part of its commitment to the development of chips with 32-nanometer (or less) circuitry".  <br><br>Sony is going to continue to design the 32nm chips with Toshiba and IBM.  They are not going to design the **manufacturing process** for those chips.  That's 2 different things all together!  Geeze.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2007 1:40PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>