<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[When I go shopping for wireless mice I check two things, responsiveness for gaming and how the battery is handled. If it can't do those things right then nothing else matters because it won't sell.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 10:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Holy shit it's a Cylon!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 11:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[A nearly shameless rip off of previous Logitech laser mice...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dmccullum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 10:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was thinking the same thing.  I usually like M$ keyboards and mice, but this one just says "Hello Logitech".<br><br>...I like Logitech stuff too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[newgalactic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 11:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Speaking of shameless Logitech ripoffs:<br><a href="http://images.tigerdirect.com/skuimages/large/M17-1771-main.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://images.tigerdirect.com/skuimages/large/M17-1771-main.jpg</a><br><a href="http://boles.com/called/logitechmx1000.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://boles.com/called/logitechmx1000.jpg</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dmccullum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 11:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow, I was just about to say it looks exactly like my vx revolution. <br><br>But if they had to copy something i'm glad they copied the logitech mice, cuz those things are a delight to hold.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellianth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[You got that backwards, Logitech mice are shameless rip off's of the classic wireless MS mice. Microsoft came out with the thumbrest design long before Logitech.<br><br><a href="http://www.mrgadget.com.au/catalog/images/MicrosoftBluetoothMouse.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.mrgadget.com.au/catalog/images/MicrosoftBluetoothMouse.gif</a><br><br>People forget that years ago Microsoft was the leader in keyboards and mice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 3:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[it's a mouse !! ... how do you want it to look like other than that !!?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sLm4ever]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 6:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[MS is big and powerful...and dumb as a post. I'm guessing they can't crank out ERGONOMICALLY correct mice because the word is too big for 'em. Shame on ALL makers of non-ergonomically correct mice. Maybe the carpal tunnel repair industry is behind all these wrist-damaging mice. Take cover.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 11:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[whyyyyyy do they refuse to make anything half decent with a wire? i'm still using my intellimouse explorer, this thing isn't going to last forever.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dammit someone beat me on the cylon comment.<br>All it needs now is a red strobing LED and a .wav file of "By your command" to play on button clicks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wormwoody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 11:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[6000 v2?!<br>Only Microsoft would give a product two version numbers - or the same product an identical name save for a subtly hidden version number.<br><br>Sheesh, I'm confused enough already, and I haven't even tried the thing yet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Picklesworth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 11:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah, but how easily will it mount on a shark's head?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drei]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 2:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the Wireless Laser Mouse 5000, manufactured in August 2006. I love it, the weighted scroll wheel is awesome, the design is symmetrical and feels fairly ergonomic/supportive, and has a nice weight to it (could use a little more). I'm not a gamer though, just a coder.<br><br>Re: multiple version numbers, have you guys ever seen D-Link? Same deal, model numbers with different version numbers. And they release like 3-4, not just 2.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bbb3108]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[That mouse looks awful and uncomfortable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CoolBradG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2007 4:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Folks, this is actually the new version of the Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 not the NATURAL Wireless Laser Mouse 6000.<br><br><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/mouseandkeyboard/productdetails.aspx?pid=049" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/mouseandkeyboard/productdetails.aspx?pid=049</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[STiFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 8:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 hits FCC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/microsoft-wireless-laser-mouse-6000-v2-0-hits-fcc/</guid><description><![CDATA[I could have done without the design.  What this mouse really needs is a clicking scroll wheel.  I'm currently using the 1.0 600 and by design, the scroll wheel does not click and is as sensitive as a trip mine.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2007 10:25PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>