<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where was the review? What I read was a long rant. Hopefully Engadget can come out with a review for the new Zune soon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[qwerty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 2:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree.  Is it worth mentioning that, conversely to the MS stuff, nearly all the Apple products (iPhone, iPods, Leopard, new iMac, etc) have had glowing reviews here?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[What is a review but a person or publication's opinion about something? What, exactly, was lacking? We covered the changes, improvements, shortcomings, and comparisons of the new hardware and Zune 2.0 software to other devices in the market.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mike, you're wrong -- I reviewed the iPod touch and I doubt anyone thinks that was a "glowing" review. Try paying closer attention, we're very critical of Apple, just as we are of everything consumer tech related.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Perhaps they come off a little harsh on the new Zune not because they dislike the idea of a competing product to the iPod, but because they had such high hopes for it that just weren't met.  It seems the complaining isn't that it's not as good as an iPod, but that it isn't better. Why settle for average?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jonathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[I did not mention the iPod Touch.  Nor did I say, "All Apple products."  I don't want to get into a semantical war with you, or anyone, Ryan.  I am an avid Engadget reader; have been for a long time.  I only wanted to voice my opinion that Engadget appears to be rather harsh with MS-related news.<br><br>I'd love to be a Mac-fanboy as much as I am an MS and Linux fanboy (it's true, I thoroughly enjoy both), but I cannot afford to buy an iMac "just to play around with."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Man, when did the PC/Windows/Zune mafia get so angry and venomous?  I mean really, rating down the comments of the author of the blog you're reading?  That's cold.<br><br>Ryan, don't listen to these guys, we still like you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elliot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA["Try paying closer attention, we're very critical of Apple, just as we are of everything consumer tech related."<br><br>I just can't believe Ryan said that. Deep down somewhere the truth lies.<br><br>And it's just like Gizzmodo'z rating of 6/10 despite a good review. I thought Engadget would do a little better than that. <br><br>I applaud for the excellent coverage though (good going).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shishyan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ryan,<br>I agree that a review is someone's opinion of something.  A gadget review is, however, usually a review of the device and not necessarily a commentary on the industry with a few comparisons of other devices thrown in.<br><br>I clicked through the link because I wanted to know how the device worked, not because I wondered how it compared to an ipod.  I know how ipods work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ins0mn1ac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 4:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have to say this article was accurately earlier described as being more of 'rant' than a 'review'! I honestly think you guys should do a part two to somewhat 'redeem' yourselves. Intentions aside, the article reeks of 'fanboy-ism'.<br><br>In other news, I used to really like iTunes on the PC, but recently I have started looking up alternatives because iTunes 7.5 SUCKS ON VISTA! I am not alone in this opinion (Check out the comments and ranking on the Betanews.com page for iTunes). It's gotten very slow and unresponsive over time. I really like Apple, but when they are on top in a market they act just like M$. The sit on their asses and start cranking out crappy products (PowerPC anyone? Dark days I tell you).<br><br>The Zune software (which you can get here - <a href="http://www.zune.net/en-us/products/zunesoftware/download.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.zune.net/en-us/products/zunesoftware/download.htm</a>) is actually a great iTunes alternative! <br>It's fast a slick! The BEST feature for me has to do with PODCASTING, which was hardly covered in this review! Zune put podcasting at the forefront and makes it easy to find new podcasts and subscribe to them. It even automatically discovers the podcasts that you subscribed to with iTunes - Charming! <br><br>Pluses for Zune (Software only):<br> - Slick and stable<br> - Faster than iTunes on Vista<br> - Imports unprotected music and podcast from iTunes<br> - Easy to navigate<br> - You can play photo slideshows and music together<br> - Better than iTunes for getting at podcasts (I nearly chocked my HD because I went crazy downloading!!!)<br> - Did I mention fabulous for podcasting yet??? :)<br>- It will download podcasts from your PC, but not from the internet (plus and a minus, but mostly a plus if your PC is up to date)<br><br><br>Minuses for Zune (Software only):<br>- Large format may turn off Winamp users<br>- Cannot play protected music purchased in iTunes<br>- PC only<br>- I did not get CD text titles when I burnt an Audio CD :(<br><br><br>All in all my experience with the Zune software was very positive. In case you’re wondering, I don't have a Zune player yet, but the software is 'worth' covering on its own - it's a real gem. I’ll sure be looking at getting the 80GB model this Christmas!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Efosa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 21st 2007 7:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know I might think of buying one, but it doesn't supporting hooking up to a Mac. The iPod will always hook up to a P.C have to go both ways I think for the Zune, and maybe they might sell some of those]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dizilbdog]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 2:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Rarely would I hear a mac person actually confess to wanting a Zune, its not worth M$'s money to invest in the mac fanbase.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really bet that is the case.  How many MAC users would actually do more than "test" a friends Zune or something.  I don't mean any kind of flames or anything like that, but people that are usually Mac users are going to go with an iPod over the Zune.  Probably even if the Zune was a better product.  I think MS thought this as well and decided it wasn't worth their time or money to try to get into a market that doesn't want them.   <br>It would be like marketing a Toyota to my Redneck uncle, it just isn't worth the time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jivetrky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[The iPod will hook up to a PC because it has to.  If they didn't, there's no way it would have the market share it enjoys now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cupajo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[iPhone, FTW!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FrankTheCrank]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[As a Mac user and Windows user i would look at a Zune if was Mac compatible, but its not.. <br><br>The Zune UI is much more slick than the UI of the iPod nano and Classic. Offering the artist engravings all the time would be cool. And now that they changed to the squircle from the D-Pad that i absolutely hated.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've always been a Mac user and would thoroughly consider getting a Zune if it had OS X support. Mind you, we don't all have some life-time commitment to all and any Apple products.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Wronski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Perhaps what's missing from this review are more detailed descriptions of the features, functionalities and user experience of this new product.  Someone who has never used a Zune before wouldn't benefit much from reading this.  Too much comparison with other products while not enough info on the one being reviewed.  A thorough video on the new interface might not have been a bad idea either.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joe23521]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow what a review. When pictures and information started coming in about the Zune 2 it seemed like Engadget had finally got rid of their anti-Microsoft, anti-Zune sentiment but once again here we go: "Its better than the iPod but still not good enough". When will it ever be enough Engadget? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Slvrgun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 2:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think they said that it's better than the iPod.<br><br>Pretty much they say that it sucks... lots of Hype, but it doesn't offer up anything unique, just one big runner-up... Buy the 80gig for $80 next year (I just bought a Zune1 for $80 on woot.com), and it'll be a good deal.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dusty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[they said it was better than the last zune, not the ipod.  Zune better than iPod? ha]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dizilbdog:  Don't forget that the media library is terribly portable with iTunes as well.  Drag over your folder to the Mac, remove the .itl extension from the one file and viola it pulls in your library, all your ratings, etc.  It's terribly simple to move between Mac and PC with iTunes.  If I put everything into my Zune I'd have to rebuild my library and playlists if I wanted to go back again.<br><br>That being said the new firmware and client is realllyyy slick.  I upgraded my Black 30 this morning.  <br><br>PS:  Where the heck is the ID3 tag editor!?  Am I just blind?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 2:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA["and we don't even have any particular affinity for iPods."<br><br><br>LMAO!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xavier Gill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 2:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, I spit out my lunch when I read that.  Who are they trying to convince, us or themselves?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think you'll be hard pressed to actually demonstrate some finite examples of us having said something unfairly positive about an Apple product -- especially iPods -- and unfairly negative about Microsoft products. It's not some secret that we're not firm iPod believers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll have to give Engadget (and Giz, for that matter) some credit.  They're Zune coverage has been much more even-handed ever since the announcement of the v2 (and the firmware update for v1).  They've actually had some positive things to say about the Zune.<br>Of course, that still doesn't change the fact that on lanch-day for the iProne- I mean, iPhone there was approximately three thousand different posts about it, each one more masturbatory than the last.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cupajo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[and by "they're coverage" of course I mean "their coverage".<br><br><br>I hate when other people do that, but I hate it even more when I do it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cupajo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Should the Zune support OSX?<br><br>I don't think it's about Microsoft ignoring the Mac user base... it's more like realistically, how many Mac users would adopt the MS product?<br><br>With all the competition and animosity between the two camps what would be the point? Perhaps the omission of an OSX could be viewed as a professional courtesy.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spyvie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 2:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[When I think of Microsoft, "professional courtesy" isn't at the top of the list.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am a mac user and would consider this device! In fact, when I saw the cheap refurb units I even seriously considered it until my research showed that there is nothing that makes the Zune work on a Mac.<br><br>Therefore my short-list of media players is: an Archos 605 (for functionality) or iPod Touch (for engineering/design). <br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theninthcloud]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed.  This "review" was written by a Mac user, and if Mr. Block is a representative of the "Mac community", then it would appear that Mac support would be a complete waste.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[John, I'm a long time PC user; on my desk I have a Vista machine sitting right next to the Mac on my desk. In a former career I worked for years running IT in Windows-only companies. Try not to make uninformed assumptions.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[but wait.. aren't Macs incredible wonder machines because they can run OSX *and* Windows? so what's the problem? Mac users can simply use their Zunes on their Windows partitions..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Spyvie makes a good point about how many Mac users would use the Zune, but at the same time, I do see Ryan's point to MS and if they are really having the Zune be at least somewhat of an iPod competitor, they need to make their product work on the Mac.  As with Ryan, I'm a Windows IT guy, but use a Mac for my personal computer and as much as I like the iPod, I can see a point in having another choice for a DAP player.<br><br>Regardless of all that, I think the Zune is missing one key piece in competing with the iPod:  suport for AAC.  Obviously iTunes Store purchases with DRM would not work, but think about a lot of people that use iTunes to rip their CDs.  By default, it rips songs into the 128k AAC (unless you change it under Preferences).<br><br>Given a huge library of songs, it would be nice to have Zune find those songs and not convert them, but attach them to it's library, very much how iTunes can find songs.<br><br>If Zune already does this, it wasn't mentioned above.  But given the listed formats that Ryan puts in his first look review, I'm assuming AAC is not supported.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChillyWilly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 5:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[OMFFFFG!! F'n software comPLETELY F'd up all of my album art and ID tags!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TwhiT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[...and most importantly, it doesns't play FLAC and Ogg Vorbis.<br><a href="http://flac.sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">http://flac.sourceforge.net</a><br><a href="http://www.vorbis.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.vorbis.com</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdroid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 2:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ogg. FLAC.<br><br>LOL. Seriously. Other than being open source fap material for uber nerd geek fanboys, nobody cares about ogg or flac.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[FLAC and Ogg Vorbis...<br><br>HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...<br><br>You actually listen to audio into those two formats?  Oh man.<br><br>Wait, maybe you're being sarcastic?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sgt_easton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 21st 2007 10:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Could you guys be any more Apple-Centric?  There is a ton of buzz over this product and I for one am thrilled that MS just gave me a 'new' device by upgrading the firmware.  I'm glad I was an early adopter.  Try a little objectivity and get off the bandwagon!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Indylux]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow... that had a decidedly negative tone to it.  Maybe the Zune isn't the perfect solution for everyone, but it really seems like it is a good product.  For those of us that aren't able to use an iPod, or just plain don't like them (for whatever reasons), the Zune seems to be a great alternative.  I'll be picking one up this afternoon if I can find one to find out for myself how good they are.<br><br>I'm starting to get a little frustrated with the increasingly pro-Apple agenda here at engadget.  As time goes by it seems like unbiased product information is becoming harder and harder to find.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[just out of curiosity, what would prevent a person from being able to use an iPod?  I am pretty sure they can be used with PCs, Macs, and Linux.<br><br>For the record, I highly dislike Apple, so don't think I am some Mac fanboy, I am just curious as to why a person wouldn't be able to use an iPod.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 21st 2007 9:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[out of honest curiosity, why would you not be able to use an iPod?  (but *could* use a Zune?)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Except that it looks like mickey mouse!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[willyboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have 1100 CDs and about 950 of them are ripped using WMA.  I ripped them before the iPod became popular, and it took nearly 4 months to finish them all.  (MP3 sound quality isn't acceptable, so WMA was my only option at the time.)  <br><br>Since Apple chose to remove (not omit) WMA support from the iPod, I can't play my files, and I'm not going to go through the CD ripping process again.  Plus, the audio artifacts from converting WMA->AAC are too audible for me to ignore, so conversion is absolutely out of the question.  Therefore, an iPod is not an option for me.<br><br>Plus I find the whole Apple system way too closed for my taste.  Granted the Zune is just about as closed a system, but at least I can play my files in just about every piece of software on Windows.  You certainly can't say that about AAC.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 3:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bet you're kicking yourself now for converting that entire collection to an extremely closed format like WMV (or AAC).  Yikes.  Everyone else reading this should learn the lesson his story teaches before falling into this trap yourself.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2007 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually I'm very glad I went with WMA instead of AAC.  Very few of the pieces of software I use on a regular basis support AAC.  WMA is much more widely supported.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2007 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought a zune30 because woot gave them away.<br><br>I am a "hater" of all things Ipod (well, the iphone is kinda cool so is the touch).<br><br>I really hate itunes.<br><br>With the zune, I feel like microsoft has taken all the bad things about the Ipod (proprietary software, limited format compatibility, etc) and released them about a year after the apple has.  Oh, and they are a bit uglier too.<br><br>I was really hoping the new firmware would somehow make a revolutionary jump forward.  Maybe jump up and challenge a real media library like media monkey.<br><br>Nope.  Zune still sucks.  I agree with engadgets statements:<br><br>   we don't even have any particular affinity for iPods.<br>   So Zune, same place, same time in late 2008? <br>   Bring your A-game, do something   new. We'll be ready.<br><br>-AD<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA["squircle" is the best word ever.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fakeduffy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[For me, the FM radio is enough of a difference, and I don't care for iTunes. I'd be interested to know what you base your comments about the number of Mac owners to suggest Microsoft need to support OSX, is it more than the usual 70/30 rule (Which if I remember correctly, Apple follow too) ? <br><br>Are most iPodians Mac owners, or are they using it on Windows, My guess is that the iPod was helped considerably more by bringing it to Windows, than it'd help the Zune going to OSX.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[charlie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/13/new-zune-review-better-than-before-but-not-quite-good-enough/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is there some way to filter out Ryan's entries?  I think I've finally had enough.<br><br>You might at least change the 'Review' in the headline to 'Editorial'.  What I continue to read on this site is not how the device meets its stated goals, but how it fails to live up to the random expectations of the contributing author.  <br><br>WE DON'T CARE what you want the device to do.  Does it do what it is SUPPOSED to do?  Sheesh.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Forrest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2007 3:03PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
