<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Samsung's SyncMaster 2263DX: the 22-inch UbiSync monitor</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/samsungs-syncmaster-2263dx-the-22-inch-ubisync-monitor/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Samsung's SyncMaster 2263DX: the 22-inch UbiSync monitor</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's SyncMaster 2263DX: the 22-inch UbiSync monitor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/samsungs-syncmaster-2263dx-the-22-inch-ubisync-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/samsungs-syncmaster-2263dx-the-22-inch-ubisync-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hello lag and worse picture quality... Can this thing really play video/games properly?<br><br><br>It could be a very useful thing as a second monitor, rolling server console cart, etc though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 4:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's SyncMaster 2263DX: the 22-inch UbiSync monitor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/samsungs-syncmaster-2263dx-the-22-inch-ubisync-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/samsungs-syncmaster-2263dx-the-22-inch-ubisync-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have read some of the rather speculative comments made on previous articles related to these new USB monitors and for this thread would like to add my own.<br><br>I am using, in the flesh, a 19" Samsung monitor over USB. The first question that a lot of people posting here would seem to ask next is "Why on earth would I want to do that? It's outrageous, ridiculous!!! If you do such and such calculation then blah blah blah...."<br><br>I work for a business where for most people running 2 monitors is a minimum requirement, I personally use 3 and others even more.  A lot of us, myself included, run laptops too so our IT department has spent the last few years in docking station + PCI express card HELL.  You should see their glittering eyes now at the mention of these new USB monitors and how much wasted time and pain is being saved.<br><br>Of my 3 screens - all the same Samsung 19" - one is using VGA, one DVI and the 3rd USB.  In terms of quality if I had the time or inclination to bother to analyse the pixels then no doubt they would stack up as expected but truly, honestly as I use these screens day-to-day there is no noticeable difference unless I rapidly shake a window around (hardly normal usage) in which case the USB is only a little bit worse.<br><br>So video card techies / snobs, you are correct to be up in arms if the context is gaming or if someone was trying to run 4 USB monitors in serial on a slow PC.  Otherwise, unless you're talking about something very niche, then for most business applications these USB monitors work well and I expect they'll be taking the world by storm.<br><br>Yours,<br><br>An actual USB monitor user.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 9:27AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>