<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love my Zune 80.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[allens555]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2007 10:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ryan Block:<br><br>"There's just no reason to make people choose between WMP10 and Zune, especially with Urge dead and gone."<br><br>Um, maybe you haven't been updated about this, but there's a WMP 11 out there, you know.<br><br>I still find it to be the best media management/playback program, because it:<br><br>1) supports a ton of devices and online stores<br>2) has a beautiful graphical UI<br>3) supports add-ons ( <a href="http://wmplugins.com/" rel="nofollow">http://wmplugins.com/</a> )<br>4) fully works in the Windows Taskbar<br>5) has tons of visualizations (look at this! : <a href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070831/psychedelia-wmp-visualization/" rel="nofollow">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070831/psychedelia-wmp-visualization/</a> )<br>6) simple to make playlists<br>7) many media playback enhancement (Now Playing > Enhancements > Show Enhancements)<br><br>I can go on and on. But it's #1 in my head. Far better than iTunes, and just marginally better than ZMP.<br><br>Now if only Microsoft could combine the fluid UI of ZMP, and the graphical beauty of WMP 11.<br><br>That would be the ULTIMATE media program.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 8:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[michael, I think that's what he's saying, microsoft should combine the two since they're both good programs, but zune users *have* to use zmp even though they might like windows media.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 10:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[Michael... I'm not trying to oust you or anything, cause I too like WMP 11, I think WMP in general is a great program...<br>But...<br>For managing music...<br>I think Amarok is the best (IMO Hands-down) music player... the only real downside to it is that it's  Linux-BSD-Solaris (any of those non-proprietary OSS's, or OSX with an X11 Layer) only...<br>Amarok may not support as many stores... but, it will support ANY player (cept' the Zune of course), some with a little work... but it gets it done.<br>So... yeah...<br>A matter of opinion... but, Amarok is in alot of opinion THE killer-app when it comes to music playing.<br>GR]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gene]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2007 12:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[where did you get your zune 80 i can't find one in stores anywhere?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[angrybubbles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2007 12:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[All the Zune-ecstatic astroturfing here is fine and good (Microsoft perfected the art after all), but if you want some *real* perspective on the new Zune, specifically the new desktop software, check any of the online Zune forums, where the new desktop software is being met with digital torches and pitchforks, from the Zune faithful no less.  Sounds like things have been seriously dumbed down, when they work at all.  Well played, Microsoft, well played.<br><br>Vote me down, but it's true.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Quix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2007 1:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Quix:<br><br>If you don't even care at all about Zune, why'd you bother commenting?<br><br>And yes, while the Zune is dumbed down in features, I find it very much easier to find music, sync music, and do what I need to do.<br><br>For everything else, there's WMP 11. If only MS could just put those two together.<br><br>Compare both to iTunes, and they win. Seriously, iTunes is by far a really junky player. It amazes me that Apple made that hideous thing.<br><br>And while there are complaints, there are obviously praises about the software. A quick new release could fix a few problems in no time.<br><br>So does Apple pay you to troll around on Zune sites and bring up the worst, or what? Because that's really sad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2007 3:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[actually, this review hits the nail pretty much on the head, as do these first comments. That has to be a first.<br>- zmp1.x was good at organising your music library, but horrible at synching<br>- zmp2 is good at searching / playing / synching, but useless for organising / tag editing. It also lost the ability to create custom/dynamic playlists - which was a big loss for a lot of zune users.<br>- overall the experience of using my zune30 is a lot nicer and streamlined now than it was before, i'd say it's up there with itunes.<br>- because of the lack of id3 tag editing, a separate app is needed to edit tags. I'm using Helium (www.helium-music-manager.com) to manage, as it actually saves tags back to the mp3s, which some other players do not (ahem)<br>- zmp2 also lost the ability to transcode music to wma when synching, so i now use db power amp to transcode to wma10 pro (which the zune supports natively, zmp1 used to use wma9 iirc).<br><br>if ms can up their game with zmp2, and give us regular updates, bringing back some of the features from zmp1, i think we will all be happy puppies, but as it is the totally re-writen zmp is a good starting point.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jrb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2007 4:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA["Compare both to iTunes, and they win. Seriously, iTunes is by far a really junky player. It amazes me that Apple made that hideous thing."<br><br>Apple actually didn't create iTunes, at least not initially. They bought "SoundJam MP" from "Cassady & Greene" and have been building upon that base. Myself, I like iTunes quite a bit, though certainly have some quibles with it too. I should also note that I run it on a Mac, so perhaps it works better on the Mac than it does in Windows.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2007 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[Have they added gapless playback on the Zune 2?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[Zune FTW]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bob e]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 3:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA["But Microsoft are a SOFTWARE company, so why do they make Zune (and Xbox)?"<br>For better or for worse, they're out there to make money...<br><br>"Does anyone think Microsoft would've bothered with Zune if Apple included WMA playback in iPods?"<br>I don't think it would have made much difference at all, really.  Barely anyone uses it, and even if they threw support onto the ipod very few people would care.  WMA may be decent, but there are really better alternatives.  MP3 is the widest spread, and if you want the best sound quality to file size there are better options there too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vanillacide<br><br>Why would you hope against the Zune doing well? If you don't like it you could at least hope for it to have an influence on the iPod's pricing. And why shouldn't Microsoft make the Xbox, it's incredibly successful. All we can hope for is that the Zune is as successful in the PMP market as the Xbox is in the console market.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JDizzle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA["And why shouldn't Microsoft make the Xbox, it's incredibly successful."<br><br>By what standard do you consider the Xbox "incredibly successful"? Because from a business perspective (you know, that whole "making money" thing) the Xbox is one of the biggest failures in the digital world. Aside of a quarter or two, it has been nothing but a financial black hole that MS have pumped billions in and have yet to make any money on.<br><br>Popular (mostly) among the people using it? Oh yes, very successful at that. But as a business model, the whole Xbox operation is a $5 billion dollar failure thus far…<br><br>(not to say I disagree with the general point that competition for the iPod is a good thing. It is, no matter who it comes from)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[farukates]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 8:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vanillacide<br><br>I don't think anything you said made any sense. Period.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 7:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[@vanillacide<br><br>They are failing with the Xbox 360? I think you are mistaken. Maybe you are just thinking of the RRoD, but that has not, in the least slowed their sales. The 360 has a huge sales lead on the PS3 overall and *since* the PS3 has launched. If the 360 was not there, gamers would have just a choice between a PS3 and a Wii... how in the world would that be good? The NPD gives a clear picture of console sales that you cannot dispute.<br><br>Your hardware/software grumbling is just nonsense. Why would Microsoft enter as a competitor in the PC manufacturing business when it is essentially a partner with virtually almost every PC manufacturer? The same goes with the mobile platform.<br><br>They don't have any major partners in the portable media or gaming industries that could mount a serious run at taking the market share. The last console to have anything MS based in it was the Dreamcast. There are a few pmp's that run Windows software but none that can pose a threat to the iPod.  MS felt, in both markets, to make a run at it they had to enter themselves. It makes complete sense if they want to expand their business (and why wouldn't they) that they will have to start developing some hardware.<br><br>@farukates<br><br>The Xbox is one of the biggest failures in digital electronics history? If you are really going to argue profitability look at the competition. Sony is bleeding a lot more $$ on the PS3. The Wii is profitable, but the technology is essentially the same as a Gamecube with motion sensing. That isn't a knock on the Wii, but it is the honest truth.<br><br>The 360 has become profitable, and with the exception of the 1 billion dollar write-off, (which doesn't mean they actually spent it), the product has been very strong in sales all year. The entertainment division, which includes the 360 and the Zune, has gone green and is projected to continue to do so. They are beginning to make money on the hardware in addition to software and Xbox Live. Will you next say that Xbox Live is one of the biggest failures as well?<br><br>I have no problem with anyone disliking MS or the Zune; I do however, have a problem with stupid people.<br><br>Now as far as the review goes, pretty solid. The complaints here are the same as I have. These are mistakes that can be corrected with firmware updates, and I hope MS gets the memo.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2007 12:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice, well laid out review, you still have the same opinon as in the first "review," but now we can see where you're coming from and your conclusions seem a lot more valid.  Any stats on battery life?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 3:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[Also, the PCMag review of the flash zunes mentioned laggy performance in the menus, though they didn't have any trouble with the lag in the 80gb version, notice any of that?  I was wondering if that was a problem for all of them or perhaps they got one with buggy software/hardware.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 4:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree, the last review had to be the worst review I've ever read. This is one of the better Zune reviews.<br><br>Zune 80 battery life:<br>30 Hours Music<br>4 Hours Video<br><br>I'm guessing the larger screen drains the battery.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 7:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree, this is an excellent and informative review.  <br><br>I have owned many iPods and I'm often frustrated at how easily they crap out (usual life span is about a year in my hands) and therefore am seriously interested in moving into a Zune (or "other") player.  But with the literally thousands of dollars I've spent on music, tv shows, movies, and videos, at iTunes I'm not sure that i can ever leave apple.  The price of their players is trivial to how much they have me indebted to the service.  Maybe someday when the Social and Xbox Live are synced and I can port over my tv and movie purchased to a Zune, it will be worth the switch.   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2007 1:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jason<br><br>Just switch to another player.  The Apple DRM is simple to bypass.  It'll take time to convert all the files, but you won't be under their thumb anymore, and that's the important part, right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2007 12:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nicely done.  Thank you.  I wish you had mentioned the lack of intelligent playlists.  The way my iPhone and AppleTVs keep ALL my media in sync, bookmarked and rotating is why I use iPods.  Cheers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[Umm the Zune syncs and keeps bookmarks on media to.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FordGTGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 4:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does that mean you have an iPod AND an iPhone???But...but....wasnt the iPhone meant to be the greatest iPod ever??Why would you need both???OMG]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[McGinley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 4:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[@McGinley<br><br>Maybe he had another iPod before the iPhone.  Or maybe he needed more space.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 6:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Peter<br><br>"Maybe he had another iPod before the iPhone. Or maybe he needed more space."<br><br>Phew, thanks! Maybe I can finally get some sleep tonight knowing there was some kind of logical explanation for owning both Apple products!<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LiQuiD_FuSioN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2007 1:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[Much better and more well though out review this time.  This one sounds like you aren't a blatent Apple fanboy this time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 3:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[i would say they're not "fanboys" of anybody in particular.  They seem to be equally harsh on everybody...but that's my take.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[blevay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 7:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[My guess is that he had to go to the principals office after the first reivew and following censorship.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Argot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 7:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[actually you can still switch languages, english spanish or french. in the zune30 with the new firmware atleast...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jbhitter24]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 3:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[ya, zune 80 has language menu too. looking at it right now. Don't know what Ryan's talking about with that]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 11:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[I must say, the review is a lot more unbiased this time, Ryan. However, you fail to mention a few critical points, such as the whole Zune Originals thing, the glass screens, the FM radio....<br><br>It's some of the niceities that Apple would never put in because they may add .001 inches to the iPod or give the user some control over it [gasp!].<br><br>All I'm saying is, for the Zune 80 to get an 8.3 while the iPod Classic only got an 8 on CNet is definitely saying something, and while you're right that the Zune is missing some critical features, I think it deserves a little more credit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Stropko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[agreed... overall this was a much better review but you still gave apple too much credit and zune not enough.  zune doesnt have to be better in every respect to sell units but it has to be as good and this is that when compared to the classic and nano.<br><br>i still disagree with your comparison to the touch....  they are two different products. <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 5:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[what I really don't understand is how can you review a product that you haven't actually touched? Sure you could do a Zune 4/8 to Nano comparision, since they sent you one... but if you haven't actually touched the flagship model why would you even attempt to compare anything to the Zune 80? <br><br>When reading the first review, I really thought you had a touched a Zune 80.... this review is a more balanced, so thats something...<br><br>also tracks that are not in the Marketplace do not show up on your Zune card...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rittertechnic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 6:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[It DOES Deserve more credit, and quite a bit more<br><br>If this should be compared to any iPod, it should be the Second gen. I know it's 5 years since that but think about it, the second gen iPod was more compatible, added better software and a slightly better UI and added a touch sensitive navigation pad. Sound familiar?<br><br>Microsoft have taken the exact same idea with the Zune 2.0. Everyone seems to forget that this is only their second PMP, and their first flash based PMP. Yet it already has some advantages over the iPod Classic & Nano, so I say give it a chance, and hope enough people buy it to make Apple scared and maybe even add some of the Zune's features to the iPod's<br><br>As the guy above me said, stop comparing with the iPod touch, because they are very, very different, and the iPod touch makes it look a lot worse that it is.How is it fair to say that this should have functions that the Touch and Archos 605 have, when it is meant to rival the iPod Classic & players similar to that?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jamma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 6:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[Much better but feels like you are trying to justify your original zune review. You say a zune feature is better than the ipod's (eg: UI) then proceed to undercut it. I bet if you made a simple table (or not. [see vista vs leopard]) breaking out the features of the nano/classic vs the zune 4/8/80 it would tell a much different story.<br><br>some things to add:<br>- zune 80 comes with premium earbuds.<br>- new zune UI option to "go to artist" when you center click while a songs is playing. This is helpful if you are shuffling 5000 tracks and you want to switch gears quickly.<br><br>some things I disagree with:<br>- the competitors have to "pull out all the stops" to beat apple. you make it sound like the other devices are lacking in features. if you look at brands like iriver, sandisk, and meizu thats not the case (you even hinted at this). what apple has is a 7 year head start and killer advertising. so pulling out all the stops will really only involve time and advertising by a company (which is what MSFT is doing).<br>- ~video and audio breakout is annoying~. you are nitpicking.<br>- the zune social site works fine in firefox. music samples and all.<br>- zune software uploaded plays to the social site with no problems. i have a feeling you made very little effort to troubleshoot once you found it didnt work.<br><br>thats all for me. others will critique.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 7:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Aaron "i still disagree with your comparison to the touch.... they are two different products."  I disagree, they are both portable music players. That is what is being reviewed here. One has FM and wi-fi sync, larger device space, at least in the  30GB and 80 GB models. The other has a web browser, portable music store downloads and if hacked, mail, calendar, notes, GBA, afp, etc. all  with a very functional keyboard. The quickest I have used in such a small device. Each to their own.  Each person has different needs. But, please do not insinuate that the devices cannot be compared. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[willyboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 9:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[@willyboy: They really shouldn't be compared simply because they serve 2 completely different purposes. I think Leo Laporte hit it right on the head when he said that the ipod touch is not a good music player, although it's an excellent video player. It has a great screen and it touch screen and has wifi and all that but as a pure music player doesn't match up to almost any player out there, because it's not meant to be a pure music player. They aren't similar enough to be compared, the same way it's tough to compare a big home theater system to a pmp.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 11:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[The removal of auto-playlists in Zune software 2.0 wasn't even mentioned? It seems like the Zune software was released by a certain date (instead of when it was finished) with features removed. As it is now, the Zune v2 software is now only marginally better than a simple drag-and-drop copy of music a la the no-name PMPs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ObliteRon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[They are adding auto-playlists to the Zune once they find out how the consumer wants the to work.<br><br>go to Zune.net.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FordGTGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 4:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[You still forgot the most important, sound quality analysis!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Homeboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[Um, it's in there!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 4:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[as ryan mentioned (bravo)<br>the sound is pretty much what you'd expect from a pmp- and largely depends on the quality of your media along with the headphones you are using.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[richardofthe1000yaos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 5:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Ryan Block<br><br>That was a pathetic analysis of sound quality. I think he's interested in how well the equalizer works... which is probably better than the iPod.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[js]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 5:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[I haven't used the new Zune at all, but . . . everything I read pointed to there being no equalizer presets (or custom) at all.  So . . . it must not work as well.  The equalizer, I mean.  Of course it's very, very arguable whether or not an EQ preset is any better than the pre-loaded levels you get out of the box.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rlh82]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 6:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ js<br><br>i thought the EQ was removed in the new Zunes. or are you making a joke and i just dont see it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mottl3y]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't know where the whole 'no equalizer' thing came from - maybe an early feature set document?<br><br>Anyhow, my 30 upgraded to 2.2 still has presets.  Unless the equalizers were a hardware thing, it's in there.<br><br>And trust me, they make a HUGE difference, at least with the Zune.  When I first upgraded the firmware, the equalizer was set to none.  Once I went looking for it and changed, it, there was a noticeable difference (for the better IMO).<br><br>I still get the feeling this line of PMPs is being reviewed against what the reviewer thinks they should be, not what they claim to be.  That's unfortunate, and will turn a lot of people off from what is really a great device.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Forrest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2007 9:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[All I need to know is if the sound quality is better or worse than the horrible sound quality of the iPod Classic.  Anyone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2007 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[(Forgot to mention, I have a Zune 30 and I "upgraded" back to the Zune V1 software once I realized what I lost with V2.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ObliteRon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/18/new-zune-review-part-2-upgrade-hardware-software-and-social/</guid><description><![CDATA[I did too... The v2 software just wasn't cutting it for me.<br><br>It would auto sync every time I plugged it in, even with autosync disabled.<br>I couldn't change basic things.<br>And the general laggyness was horrible... A bonus of the new marketplace being v2 only is that it doesn't slow the old software now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dragod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 4:14PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
