Engadget has just proven that you guys are insensitive, judgmental, and without value. (In other words, about the same level of intelligence shown by a 7th grader.) He built it from his basement for cryin' out loud. It helps his grandmother who can't read anymore. What have you done to this world a better place except to make and encourage wisecracks about a non-native's ability to speak English? (Rhetorical question.)
Hehe . . . if that's true, then his grandmother has a bad case of the grabbies, and he just programmed a robot to bitch-slap her. Latent aggression much?
Sorry, I must be too ignorant to know what the title "Aiko: world's first sexually harassed, disabled Fembot" has to do with my point. By the way, thank you for responding the way you did. I think you helped illustrate my point well.
jimrin, your reasoning is not perfectly clear to me. who exactly are you angry at? are you suggesting that engadget's editors have exposed their own juvenile nature, or simply provided a forum that is bringing out the idiots? the editors don't seem pleased with the inventor, to me, and they don't mention anything about his ethnicity or language skills. you also must admit that a machine that reads to old women doesn't need either pressure-sensitive breasts or pretty hair, not to mention that blowup-doll mouth. perhaps you should calm down before replying again.
You bring up valid points... but the Engadget editors set the tone of the way people replied. If you compare the way this article was written compared to the equivalent Gizmodo article, the only comment the crack the Gizmodo article made was commenting on the android's clothing. I would make a comment that this demonstrates the difference in the target audience between Engadget readers and Gizmodo readers but really it demonstrates the difference in the editors.
the Nook Color proved it was an undercover tablet all along, Barnes and Noble has hit back with this latest Nook as proof of its focus on one thing: reading.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Engadget has just proven that you guys are insensitive, judgmental, and without value. (In other words, about the same level of intelligence shown by a 7th grader.) He built it from his basement for cryin' out loud. It helps his grandmother who can't read anymore. What have you done to this world a better place except to make and encourage wisecracks about a non-native's ability to speak English? (Rhetorical question.)
Hey jackass, read the headline of the article.
Hehe . . . if that's true, then his grandmother has a bad case of the grabbies, and he just programmed a robot to bitch-slap her. Latent aggression much?
Sorry, I must be too ignorant to know what the title "Aiko: world's first sexually harassed, disabled Fembot" has to do with my point. By the way, thank you for responding the way you did. I think you helped illustrate my point well.
jimrin, your reasoning is not perfectly clear to me. who exactly are you angry at? are you suggesting that engadget's editors have exposed their own juvenile nature, or simply provided a forum that is bringing out the idiots? the editors don't seem pleased with the inventor, to me, and they don't mention anything about his ethnicity or language skills. you also must admit that a machine that reads to old women doesn't need either pressure-sensitive breasts or pretty hair, not to mention that blowup-doll mouth. perhaps you should calm down before replying again.
You bring up valid points... but the Engadget editors set the tone of the way people replied. If you compare the way this article was written compared to the equivalent Gizmodo article, the only comment the crack the Gizmodo article made was commenting on the android's clothing. I would make a comment that this demonstrates the difference in the target audience between Engadget readers and Gizmodo readers but really it demonstrates the difference in the editors.