http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/ Engadget Comments for Research firm says planned internet capacity upgrades will fall 60% short by 2010 http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 9:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/
Must... download... all... porn .... on ... internet... now!!!

*Runs out to buy external hard drives*

]]>Nov 20th 2007 10:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 9:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/
On topic, though, I think you already can. Let's round it to 4 GB, or 32 Gb. This means you need a 16 Gb/hr minimum connection. This works out to 16/3600, or a 4.5 Mb/s connection - very doable. In fact, many people have a cable connection this fast. I have a fast connection and can download 2 700 MB DivX videos in 20-30 minutes (about 1.3 MB/s or 11 Mb/s)]]>Nov 20th 2007 9:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/
HD looks so much smarter that SD when it comes to movies like LotR, Transformers etc. So much so I'm taking HD for granted now, and I'm seeing DVDrips or R5s the same way as I previously saw a good TS or a TC. BTW all bluray/hddvd movie rips are compressed to DVD5 or DVD9 in .MKV
]]>Nov 20th 2007 10:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 21st 2007 12:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 9:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 9:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 11:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 9:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 9:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 10:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 10:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 10:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Dec 1st 2007 12:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 10:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 21st 2007 7:21AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 10:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 10:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/1080i=560 lines/frame
720p=720 lines/frame

720p takes more bandwidth]]>Nov 20th 2007 10:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 10:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/
Wrong.
Assuming both are using 16:9 ratio, the lines on 1080i are wider then those of 720p.
1280x720 = 921600 pixels
1920x540 = 1036800 pixels
Assuming same framerate and compression of course.

Therefore kuade was right, 1080i uses more bandwidth then 720p]]>Nov 21st 2007 12:02AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Damn.
Good point.]]>Nov 21st 2007 12:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 21st 2007 1:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 10:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 11:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 20th 2007 11:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 21st 2007 12:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 21st 2007 8:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Dialup.]]>Nov 20th 2007 11:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 21st 2007 12:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 21st 2007 12:25AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 21st 2007 12:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 21st 2007 1:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 21st 2007 12:34AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 22nd 2007 9:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Dec 1st 2007 5:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/
The problem isn't who will lay the fat pipes but rather who is going to control them.]]>Nov 21st 2007 12:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/ Guess how much bandwidth it would use if it wasn't p2p...

Uhhhh, the same? The same number of bits still come down the tube.]]>Nov 21st 2007 2:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/
Lucky lucky lucky people]]>Nov 21st 2007 5:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 21st 2007 7:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Nov 21st 2007 8:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/Just wanted to let everyone know that we've made our report freely available on our web site - http://www.nemertes.com/, there's also a FAQ explaining the research methodology.

Thanks for the feedback/comments.

Irwin]]>Nov 21st 2007 9:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/research-firm-says-planned-internet-capacity-upgrades-will-fall/
http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/11/20/suckered-by-astroturf/]]>Nov 21st 2007 1:36PM