<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[Any car modder will tell you that ENCLOSURE IS EVERYTHING.<br>A cheap sub will sound better in a properly designed enclosure than a larger/more powerful sub  in a crappy enclosure.<br><br>As for space requirements... Bose, SONY and a number of other companies offer speakers you can install in the wall so you should look there first. My home theater came with a sub and my Xbox360 sits atop it (vertically)  mostly out of sight.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flashpoint]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 7:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[The idea of putting an zbox (with a hard drive) on top of a humungo speaker is somewhat disheartening. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 8:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lol zbox... Anyways you get what I'm saying. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 8:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's a sweet price if this thing works. Wonder how much bass it can produce though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carbonize]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 8:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[100 RMS is more than I will ever need, but the real question is: how good is the sounds quality? Speaker statistics don't really mean anything to me so I am not going to bother looking them up, but the price seems pretty low, and that can often mean low sound quality. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 8:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes power is one thing but power does not equal quality.<br><br>At least they gave the power in RMS instead of trying to make it sound better by using PMPO.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carbonize]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 8:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can you say combing artifacts and vent noise.<br><br>The problems with any multi-driver array come on several fronts.  Multiple drivers create an opportunity for both temporal displacements of driver movement (not exactly in physical synch).  Even if the drivers are connected to the same motor there will be physical effects at certain frequencies caused by harmonics, boundary effect, etc.  Think of waves meeting in the middle of a lake and creating a sum which is greater than their different parts.  The driver(s) meet this waves as a physical force and distort slightly (and differently) trying to overcome them. In typical driver/small sub configurations this is overcome by running the drivers out of phase to try and cancel out the effects.<br><br>Combing noise is caused by overlaps in sound waves typically near the edge of the drivers or in this case the vents.  You get small cancelations in sound from out of phase waves and re-inforcement from others.  This is very similar to the distortion effects created earlier but the waves have escaped the box at this point.  To minimize this you typically place the drivers at or above the box surface to minimize these diffraction effects and far apart to minimize straight combing.<br><br>Vent noise will be a similar but much lesser problem in this type of setup.  Typically subwoofers have nice flared vents to overcome the woosh noise or huffing caused by the air moving past the vents.  The only other way to overcome this is to make the vent so large relative to the amount of air moving past it but this eliminates the tuning effect of the vent (and probably the box to a large degree).<br><br>In any case this is probably aimed more at the bose crowd.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[earthling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 8:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[Given the wave lengths for the low frequencies, and the small compartments in the typical vehicle (along with the reflective surfaces everywhere by the listeners' ears), is combing really going to be an issue?<br><br>Plus, I bet most of these will be installed under seats and in trunks...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ladderless]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 10:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[First, I just want to say that these types of technologies *can* cause problems, not that they *will* (although its likely). Secondly, if the consumer doesn't care about the sound then it doesn't really matter one way or another, my point is that TANSTAAFL and this is not that revolutionary a product, its a development based on compromise.<br><br>Having said that: Combing and distortion will always be an issue, it does not matter what environment you use.  Its like saying bose speakers sound better in your bathroom than your living room. (they don't).  I guess if you don't care, then it doesn't matter.  Putting a speaker in your trunk is about being loud for everyone else, its not about quality sound.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[earthling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now this is interesting.  Alpine already had out the PLV-7 LAT sub system, but it was larger, and had a lot higher RMS (500 I believe).  And not to mention much more expensive.<br><br>I wonder how this little sub would perform in a car instead of a home theater.  It could be a great option to use if you didn't want to use something as large as the PLV-7.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iczer2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[I checked out the distributer, this thing is over 250 bucks...what a markup if that's true.  I thought I'c check it out at 58 but 250....I'll pass.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NxP3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 9:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[This thing can't be called a subwoofer. It only produces sounds between 50-300hz which only covers midbass. Most medium-size bookshelvf speakers can go down to 50hz. REAL subwoofers produces around ~25-100hz.<br><br>The only people that should these are people who really want to save space and own tiny speakers that aren't able to go down to 100hz.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mkygod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 10:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, the question of what qualifies as 'sub'-bass is still the topic of some debate. You've got three crowds to satisfy - car audio, home audio, and pro audio, and pro audio typically works with subs that are most efficient between 60 and 200 Hz (with some notable exceptions, especially newer designs). I like Wikipedia's definition of sub-bass: everything between 16 and 90 Hz. It satisfies all three audio sectors.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rbuszka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.caraudiomag.com/testreports/0702_cae_alpine_plv_7_subwoofer/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.caraudiomag.com/testreports/0702_cae_alpine_plv_7_subwoofer/index.html</a><br><br>the bigger brother is serious bzns]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[droopy1592]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 11:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah, i'm pretty sure that the alpine uses a tymphany driver. this one to be more precise:<br><a href="http://www.tymphany.com/datasheet/printview.php?id=139" rel="nofollow">http://www.tymphany.com/datasheet/printview.php?id=139</a><br><br>bad ass. has anyone ever used or heard the alpine? that review was sure good...<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 11:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think the 10.24- x 3.5-inches is off a bit.  According to my conversion it's more like 1.5" dia. x 8" long.  Might be good for tiny boomboxes but probably not much more.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[toyotaboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[Electrical Data<br>Nominal impedance<br>Zn<br>2<br>ohm<br>Minimum impedance<br>Zmin<br>2.1<br>ohm<br>Maximum impedance<br>Zo<br>8.4<br>ohm<br>DC resistance<br>Re<br>2<br>ohm<br>T-S Parameters<br>Resonance Frequency<br>fs<br>60<br>Hz<br>Mechanical Q factor<br>Qms<br>3.4<br><br>Electrical Q factor<br>Qes<br>1<br><br>Total Q factor<br>Qts<br>0.79<br><br>Force factor<br>Bl<br>5.6<br>Tm<br>Mechanical resistance<br>Rms<br>4.9<br>Kg/s<br>Moving mass<br>Mms<br>44<br>g<br>Suspension compliance<br>Cms<br>0.16<br>mm/N<br>Effective cone diameter<br>D<br>15.8<br>cm<br>Effective piston area<br>Sd<br>196<br>cm2<br>Equivalent volume<br>Vas<br>8.9<br>ltrs<br>Sensitivity (2.83V/1m)<br><br>90.5<br>dB<br>Sensitivity (1W/1m)<br><br>84.5<br>dB<br>Ratio BL/√(Re)<br><br>4<br><br>Ratio fs/Qts<br>F<br>76<br><br>Power handling<br>Rated Noise Power (IEC 18.1)<br>100<br>W<br>Misc. Parameters<br>Effective Frequency range (IEC 21.2)<br>50-300<br>Hz<br>Frame dimensions<br>260x90<br>mm<br>Total Mass<br>845<br>grams<br>Frequency at ka=2<br>1518<br>Hz<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hotwings]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[holy mounting holes batman]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abomb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 4:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm pretty sure this model (or technology at least) has been out for months - 3 months at least. They owe credit to a much bigger company for this though...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 4:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Tymphany's LAT250 subwoofer: smaller than you'd think]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/10/tymphanys-lat250-subwoofer-smaller-than-youd-think/</guid><description><![CDATA[Having noted LAT 500 FR-Curve dB/Hz @1W1m = 78/20 88/50 90/70 88/150 88/200 88/400, wonder if its big brother LAT 700 improves a few dB at low end 20Hz. Or parallel 2 or 4 to achieve optimum result in mating with RAAL 140-15D Ribbon with flat FR 500Hz-40kHz, should be a good marraige for small box system that excels all others and perhaps bigger box ones. Can you supply or recommend the best active and passive 2-way X-O for this configuration which will be driven by FM ACOUSTICS FM411 Mk.II 400W-Amp/FM 268 Harmonic Linearizer Line-level Preamp, the absolute best topnotch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Niphon Nimboonchaj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 20th 2007 8:22AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>