<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[HP TX1000 FTW!! DELL sells expensive crap. TX1000 is only $1000, and u you add a 30off coupon = $720+. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chino B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 12:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[It isn't even a tablet. It depends on pressure to work. It's fun to play with but it doesn't work as a tablet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ark_v2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 1:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[thats sexy?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bhoff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 12:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, it's not ugly or anything, but certainly too ordinary to be called sexy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 11:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[About as sexy as my sack.  I thought those ugly swivel tablets died off ages ago.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zebrum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[OK, look.  This thing is pretty sweet.  The MacBook Pro's were 2500 clams when they first came out and this has significantly better spec's short the ULV processors, which I have no idea if those are up to par.  If Apple just announced this product, it would be on the cover of Business Week next week and all the world would be ooohing and aaaahing over it.  I give Dell some props for getting this out the door.  I just wish I had a use for it....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 12:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[The macbook pro started at 2GHz, I think. Why is Apple being brought into this? They don't even make a touchscreen laptop. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Austin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 12:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Eh, I went with Lenovo's X61 tablet after I got sick of waiting for the XT and don't regret it. 1.8 ghz LV, 7 hour battery, 4 gigs of ram, 160 gig 7200 rpm drive, pressure sensitive screen with active digitizer- fully configured at a fraction of what Dell's offering for the base price of this thing (actually, $1400 after all the sales and offers were applied). The extra .23 pounds and added two-tenths of an inch of thickness are worth the added power/battery/hd/price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuckles McGee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 1:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[design and spec-wise for a dell: color me impressed!<br><br>If I saw this thing and an x61t side-by-side at a store i'd almost<br>pick up this dell instead of lenovo's offering<br><br>but at $2500 for a base config its easily a 1000 more than i'm willing to pay<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[naveenjohn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 12:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lets hope Dell puts out a $1500 off $2500 or more Coupon or something like that.<br>If it was priced more reasonably, i would sell my X60 Tablet ,and buy this. Especially since Capacitative Touch screens are much nicer then Resistive ones.<br>It is a very nice alternative for someone who was looking at a slate too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shyam D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 12:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[To everyone (including Engadget) regarding the starting price tag...  <br><br>Is this your first time around Dell product introductions?  Being a mail-order company, they usually launch new products at a higher price to keep demand low while they ramp up production.  Then, as they ramp up production, they lower the price.  I'm sure the XPS One will eventually drop.  That sexy XPS M1330 originally launched at $1,499 (remember?) and is now available for $999.  Even the XPS M2010 launched about $500 higher than it is selling today.  While I have no inside information to confirm this, I am sure that the Latitude XT will be available for less before very long.<br><br>Good things come to those that wait.  And cheaper things come to those that wait longer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe User]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 12:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dell is also famous for their department store pricing models, that is, mark everything up 30% and have it on sale for 30% year round.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Antimatter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 12:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[$2500?!?!?!? My company was waiting on this to choose a platform, its HP or Dell. HP fully configured is $2000 tops. When this hits the site at $2500 + options the decision will be made. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[unsigned]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 12:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[$3,399.00 Is what an X61T will cost me in New Zealand, with a $1k rebate at the base configuration.<br><br>If the Dell even comes close to the NZ$3,195 converted price it'll be worth it for me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Resolution]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's awesome! More than I expected. Man, 9 hours?! on a tablet with those specs?! And the design is nice even if it's not XPS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ark_v2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 1:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why isn't it on Dell's site yet?  HELLO?  Official to whom, Pass the tech sampler platter to the left.. um k?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 1:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[OOhh suddenly the HP tc4200 that I am writing this on seems due for an upgrade :D<br><br>...on second thought, at that price this one can probably last a while longer, I suppose.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kasona]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 1:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh WHY oh WHY can't tablet manufacturers get their act together and make a tablet with DVI out or at a bare minimum SELL A DOCK WITH DVI out.  None of them do.  And, until they do, no tablet for me.<br><br>Who wants a max res of 1280 x 800 and NO DVI out?  For $2500?  <br><br>Not me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[noise]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 1:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tablets are not meant to be primary computational devices.  They are meant for portability, presentations and user interation (conveniantly also acronymed UI).  I have a small (not tablet unfortunatly) laptop and a quad core desktop, which I purchased for $600.<br><br>What I am trying to say, is that laptops in this category are definitly not the first PC one purchases, but do make a lot of sense if they are part of a computing family to which one has access.<br><br>Come to think of it, my computing family extends from the HTC Shadow at 200 mhz, to a 1.5 ghz m1330, to the 2.4 ghz quad core, to UC Berkeley and UCSD's supercomputer network.  No, none of these devices fill all of my needs, but each one fills the right need at the right size and at the right price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 3:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Dell dock does have DVI out...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Resolution]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 2:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA["Tablets are not meant to be primary computational devices. They are meant for portability, presentations and user interation (conveniantly also acronymed UI)."<br><br>For some of us, our "primary computational device" IS meant for portability and presentations.  I need a computer in the field about 50% of the time.  I hook it up to projectors and take notes on it.  The rest of the time I want use it with a nice full sized keyboard and a big monitor.  As a result, I'm willing to skimp on things like processing power, crazy video capabilities, etc.  <br><br>But a reasonably mobile computer should also be dockable into a reasonably decent desktop computer (for working on those presentations).  Note, I'm not complaining that one of these tablets isn't good for gaming.  I'm complaining that when I'm working on a an endless stream of presentations, or documents, I want to have a nice, crisp, huge display.  For me, that means a 23" monitor with a DVI connection.  It's almost 2008.  I don't understand why this is so hard to get right.<br><br>One commenter said that the Dell tablet can be docked to a dock with DVI out.  I didn't see that a couple of weeks ago when I was specing out a replacement for my current setup.  I know for a fact that the IBM doesn't even MAKE tablet docks - all you can get is a glorified port replicator with a spare bay.  Likewise with all of the other brands I checked out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[noise]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 3:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[IF you want a tablet, buy a Motion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pablo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 4:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Want!<br><br>.. for half the price...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Trautmann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 5:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Again these bullshit battery life specs...<br><br>9 hours of WHAT? just standing there w/ the screen off and the hd in standby?  I honestly hope no-one will fall for this crap - atleast when other companies lie more realistically.. 4, 5 at most 6 hours... but 9? you gotta be kidding me!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael LaFramboise]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 5:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey Michael LaFramboise-<br><br>You should take a closer look before you jump to judgement on the battery life.  Sure everyone else lies on their specs, and they should all rot in hell.  But didn't seeing 9 HOURS throw a flag?<br><br>Dell has moved to the Dual Core LV processor with this tablet, removed the optical drive, they offer a wedge battery that adds significant secondary power, and the graphics are on the lighter side (but enough to satisfy most every need except high end gaming).<br><br>If it doesn't do it then it doesn't do it, but THIS PARTICULAR UNIT has really been worked.<br><br>You know whats worse than a company that lies about specs?  A person who thinks that EVERYTHING is a fraud.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 6:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[2 more things Dell did to stretch the battery life on this (healthcare industry) tablet:<br><br>-They only included 1 speaker<br><br>-There is an optional LED backlit screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 8:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[My XPS can withstand up to  hours with the 9 cell battery even with the GeForce Go. The LED screen helps a lot. If I can get that with the optional GPU I have no doubts the base system with the 9-cell battery can do the 7 hours Dell claims for it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ark_v2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 12:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Six, sorry XD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ark_v2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 12:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Brandon, what makes you think that I think everything's a fraud?<br><br>I own a 17" MacBook Pro and I get almost all the battery life Apple promised (get about 3 hours of WORK) - while Apple promised like 4 or something...<br><br><br>ark_v2,  again I ask, your XPS -- 9 hours of doing WHAT?  If its 9 hours of standing still with the screen turned off and the hd paused, with no programs running, then yeah, its perfectly believable - my MBP can easily do that too... but... call me crazy, but something tells me that if you actually start WORKING on your computer, ie running Adobe Creative Suite apps/Final Cut (or in your case Adobe Premiere) -- you'll barely be able to get 2-3 hours of life, even WITH the additional battery.   Of course Vista's piss poor power management doesn't really help you either :/<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael LaFramboise]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 5:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[just remove that damned touchpad if you have a nipple on the keyboard, no need for both.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[balu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 7:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why bitch about options?  Some people like the touch pad, some people like the nipple.  Having both doesn't create a negative, other than your bitching.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 8:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Brandon: it does, because while typing you accidentally touch the pad, and voila you're somewhere else. which is particularly annoying if you use a focus-on-hover window manager.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[balu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 8:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[And that's why you go into the Control Panel and Disable which one you don't use...   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Cayze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 12:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[also this includes a better gpu then the others do also.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Majortom1981]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 8:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[How can it run Vista with such low specs?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hansi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 8:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's fair (if you have crap hanging from your wrists) but I've put several thousand Dell Latitudes into production as an IT consultant and am typing on one currently and I've never accidentally touched it when typing (nor have I heard that complaint from someone who has used one).<br><br>The one button that is used more than anything is the left mouse (they do wear out).  Having a backup so you can still use it until you get it replaced gets my vote.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 9:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[if Dell can't construct a mouse button that can function reliably then the solution is not to put two of them on the laptop, but to improve the technology. <br><br>You consultants should listen to the customers request, or they will end up losing them. at least i won't buy Dell tablet any soon, will stick to the ThinkPads, because of these usability design considerations.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[balu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 11:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[So Dell is claiming that it costs $1,000 for multi-touch.  Check out this YouTube video.  Only +/- $40 bucks for a Wii remote and +/- $20 for a bluetooth USB adapter if you don't have it already and you have 4 point multi-touch.<br><br><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=5s5EvhHy7eQ" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=5s5EvhHy7eQ</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Brace]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but everything I'm reading says this thing has PATA, which I interpret to parallel ATA, why on earth would you do that when SATA is sooo much faster and Dell is already doing it on their notebooks...latitudes no less... am I missing something?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Thompson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 10:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[And for that matter, 7200 RPM drives as an option?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Cayze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/11/dell-latitude-xt-tablet-is-official-sexy/</guid><description><![CDATA[Eek, this laptop could look at me if it wanted.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2007 10:22PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
