<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for QNAP's 4-bay TS-409 NAS box gets peeked early</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for QNAP's 4-bay TS-409 NAS box gets peeked early</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on QNAP's 4-bay TS-409 NAS box gets peeked early]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm going to have to invest in something like this one day... I'm running out of room to keep stacking MyBooks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shadowise]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 8:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on QNAP's 4-bay TS-409 NAS box gets peeked early]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is not a ts-209 in a different box with more SATA ports, in fact it uses a different Marvell SOC with VFP support.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[timtim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 8:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on QNAP's 4-bay TS-409 NAS box gets peeked early]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[can somebody say drobo ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jared Rada]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on QNAP's 4-bay TS-409 NAS box gets peeked early]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought about it, but the Drobo does not do standalone upnp.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 3:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on QNAP's 4-bay TS-409 NAS box gets peeked early]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[If their price is right, then I'm on it.  I bought an Infrant NAS, without drives, and need to get a new one.  But Infrant no longer sells the driveless units at a decent price.  <br><br>At 4 TB, and climbing, I might need to look at an enterprise solution to my DVD and multimedia storage needs. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pathfinda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on QNAP's 4-bay TS-409 NAS box gets peeked early]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[The ts-209 looks a little sexier. I'm planning on building a NAS fairly soon. I want something simple and expandable. It doesn't need to scream. I was thinking just a cheepo box with software raid 5 and maybe LVM. The Drobo looked really interesting. But in the end I'm not sure if I can justify the cost when Linux seems to work perfectly fine for the most part and it has the added benefit of being able to run apps on it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on QNAP's 4-bay TS-409 NAS box gets peeked early]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder how long until Drobo releases a NAS version of their box?<br><br>I have an Infrant NV+ and while the price was right, I'm not really happy with it. I had to hook it up with a wireless adapter and anytime the connection to the router drops, it's almost guaranteed to cause the NAS to go into some sort of semi-frozen state with no other way to get it working than a hard reboot.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tpp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 11:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on QNAP's 4-bay TS-409 NAS box gets peeked early]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[How does something like this compare to Windows Home Server?  I am thinking about getting the Windows device as I can install software like Hamachi.  Can that be done here easily, or do you have to replace the OS completely with Linux before you can do something useful?<br><br>- Roger]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[roger_huston]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 2:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on QNAP's 4-bay TS-409 NAS box gets peeked early]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/13/qnaps-4-bay-ts-409-nas-box-gets-peeked-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[one of the nice things about the TS-209 (i'm assuming the 409 will be similar) is that it uses low-wattage.  I hate having a Windows Server on all the time drawwing 200 watts.  The 209 uses something like 20 watts or so.  So that's a big advantage.  And this thing comes with a Linux on it already with Apache, MySql, Twonkeyvision, etc...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2007 7:59PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
