<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Before anyone starts bashing Wal-Mart for not offering a way to strip the DRM remember that Wal-Mart is just the distributer here. They don't own the rights to the media and therefor can't simple offer such a solution without being violating federal law and being sued out their arse by the content owners.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leonard Nimrod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 9:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[...or, there's bittorrent.<br><br>see, this is one of the many reasons that people are turning to piracy: It's easier, more reliable, and will ALWAYS work. no pesky licensing schemes that prevent you from watching/listening to what you already paid for.<br><br>I'm not saying theft is right, but until they offer something as convenient and for a fair price, I'm sure it will keep going on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phrozunsun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 11:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA["Piracy, the better choice. (tm)"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elevator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 10:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[At least I can still buy my favorite pair of undies at their stores!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[quomen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 9:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[And that last sentence right there, is a damned good reason to stick with iTunes for music/video purchases...imagine spending a year or more building up a library for hundreds of dollars, and being told that you can keep the files for all eternity, but you can ONLY USE IT ON THAT ONE MACHINE, forever! iTunes aint going nowhere.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 9:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[it's the same thing with itunes. you only get so many additional downloads of things you purchased.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 11:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did the people who bought their Videos from Wal-Mart but their undies from the Apple store? Or maybe they ordered Pizza from the Zune Marketplace.<br><br>This goes to show people, buy merchandise from companies whose core product is the item that you are buying. One stop shopping has its place but cutting edge technology isn't one of them.<br><br>Who wants to bet thet the SONY Connect store for e-books will fold and that the Amazon Kindle will at least make it several years......]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[R. Corrino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[ AllOfMp3 for the win! You pay a few cents for a song and it's DRM free! Apple charges $1.29 for DRM free songs. That's ridiculous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveMB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 11:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[clearly, you forgot about the whole NBC/iTunes fiasco where people now have half a drm'ed season.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phrozunsun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 11:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[no they don't]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Derry Quinn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 11:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[read the second comment fanboy:<br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/02/nbc-content-gets-removed-from-itunes/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/02/nbc-content-gets-removed-from-itunes/</a><br><br>thanks.<br><br>and his comment is so ironic. any DRM is bad, iTunes will eventually be obsolete, so will the iPod. Locking the content to the device in a non-transcodable manner is the problem, not walmart.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phrozunsun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 11:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow. Defensive much? He was referring to the cost of iTunes Plus tracks. They aren't $1.29 anymore. They're all $0.99 now, I think.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[404error]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 5:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought this thread was about video and not music.  iTunes video is still DRM'd and the point about iTunes and the half season of NBC shows is still valid.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 5:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wasn't saying it was an invalid point. Just pointing out that calling Derry Quin a fanboy when it looks like he was just responding to SteveMB's reply was kind of silly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[404error]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 7:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Call me when I can burn the iTunes video I download onto a DVD so I can watch it on my HDTV without having to purchase some extraneous Apple branded hardware. Or when I can watch it on an mp3 player again not branded Apple, as while iPods are nice and all, having an exremely cheap, extremely small one to kick around with is equally nice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MosquitoControl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 8:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[iTunes is of course more stable, but I have cassette tapes from when I was 3 years old.  In 50 years, I don't expect iTunes to be supported either.  That's why I convert all my iTunes purchases to DRM-free now, so I can continue to convert them to whatever the current standard is for the rest of my life.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PSM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Rob, we're not talking about additional downloads here - as far as most of us are concerned, if you delete a file you don't necessarily need to be provided an opportunity to re-download the same file. What we're concerned with is the fact that once you've purchased a movie using the Walmart service, you can only view it using the computer you originally purchased the movie with. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Ledford]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2008 6:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Right before video downloading explodes with the iTunes movie rental service.<br><br>Steve Jobs FTW.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MacVicta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 9:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[It hasn't exploded with TV shows, what makes you think it's going to explode with movies?<br><br>Video downloading just isn't as big as music downloading, because the fact of the matter is most people still watch their video on a TV in their living room.  And there is still no way to do that over the internet that's as easy as "turn on your cable box or DVD player, sit down and watch".  And honestly, DRM is a big issue for those who *do* want to watch video elsewhere, because the iPod isn't nearly as popular in that arena (in fact, cheap divx-playing portable DVD players are probably a lot more popular for that purpose).  So those who do download movies are likely to keep using illegal download sites or just ripping their own DVD's.<br><br>Music is different because, as Stevie J himself said so long ago, it can be a passive activity, so it lends itself better to portability and consumption in short bursts.  But as the Wal-Mart shutdown and the NBC iTunes pullout show, nobody has been all that successful in video downloads yet.  Nobody.  Including Apple.  And the Fox deal won't change that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 7:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hell, I'm surprised they lasted that long.  When will people get with the program?  Now we'll just have to wait to see how long Amazon's media store can hold on.  Apple and iTunes FTW.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Constable Odo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 11:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think Amazon's service has at least as much staying power, and possibly more than iTunes.  Amazaon has signed up 3 of the Big 4 record companies to distribute music without DRM, while iTunes is firmly locked into DRM.  As we have seen, consumers don't like DRM, and Amazon will capitalize on this with heavy promotion.  Heard about the Pepsi tie in for next year?  Yeah.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 3:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[iTunes has been around for 6 -7 years, while Amazon unbox has been around for 5 minutes.  Who are you going to trust with your money?  <br><br>Choices:<br>1.  Rip your own DVDs<br>2. bit torrent<br>3.  iTunes video<br>..<br>..<br>..<br>..<br>32. Amazon unbox]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iRobot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2008 5:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[iTunes has one label with DRM-free music, if you forgot the 2007 news. Even Steve Jobs said on a memo, "it's best to remove DRM" or something like that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leroy Vargas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2008 8:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I the only one who didn't know it even existed?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Grand Master]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 10:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[no your not, i was reading this and thinking i didn't know they did that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[everrette powell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 8:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Another reason to not put DRM on anything. I can put on a 40 year old vinyl record anytime and enjoy it. I'd imagine most of the companies that produced them have either gone out or merged with other companies but the record still works. Good luck finding a service still around in 40 years that will support the DRM.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[blinkcowz182]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 10:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[that's the main problem with DRM. It's supposed to make it so only you, the rightful owner, can watch stuff. That would be fine and well, except that current DRM schemes instead make it so only you can watch it on your machine as long as the software is supported. <br><br>iTunes is no different in this regard. <br><br>That's why I buy DRM free or not at all. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nikster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 11:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if in 40 years there will be DRM stores like there are vinyl stores now. Someday all of us will be standing around over racks and racks of ipods saying, "Ahhh, back when music was pure."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why are you all acting like ANY of the same codecs, programs, computers, or even electrical standards are going to be around in 40 years? Much less your hard drives, which I doubt will even function properly at that point. Plus, all of your movies will probably be re-released onto some other format (probably not even digital) that you'll have to buy all over again.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 12:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[  "Why are you all acting like ANY of the same codecs, programs, computers, or even electrical standards are going to be around in 40 years? Much less your hard drives, which I doubt will even function properly at that point. Plus, all of your movies will probably be re-released onto some other format (probably not even digital) that you'll have to buy all over again."<br><br>This may be true, however I know that as my equipment improves, and we move to quantum storage and new processor models and all that kind of crap -- I know that I have chosen to store my music in a form to which I have the full source code for compression and decompression (FLAC).<br>So - no matter how things develop, I will always be able to convert my music from it's current form into whatever comes next<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Taz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 1:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I the only one who can see Wal-Mart video BETA ? and for more than a year and DRMed. Anyway, I never heard of such service to begin with<br> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wisam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 11:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, "beta" as in "we'll finish it if the site gets enough traffic to justify it."  Obviously, it didn't.<br><br>As for people not hearing of it, one of the big reasons Wal-Mart sold off their DVD rental business to Netflix was because they were getting into downloads.  They, like everyone else, expected movie downloads to eclipse DVD rentals by mail pretty quickly.  Didn't happen.  Wal-Mart's now closing down their download service and meanwhile, Netflix is still adding about 500,000 new customers per quarter.<br><br>The conventional wisdom is way ahead of the American consumer when it comes to the ways they get their movies.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 8:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I only heard of it because 300 came with a free downloadable version of it, which is dumb, because it's faster to just rip it, but i suppose they were just trying to promote their service<br>yeah, that worked]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Riley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 11:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[One clear reason why I'm still buying CDs and DVDs rather than downloading machine-locked DRM'd material: because I can play my CDs on any, ANY CD/DVD/Blu-ray player/drive and my DVDs on almost any, ANY DVD/Blu-ray player/drive out there. And as a plus, CDs preserve audio quality much better than those pesky 128-kbps MP3/AAC downloads because they use lossless 16-bit linear PCM encoding that only introduces minimal magnitude-quantization error. (DVD-Audio improves this by using up to 48-bit encoding, but so far unfortunately it hasn't achieved the same rate of success/adoption as CD-Audio.) And as another plus, DVD-Video has better video resolution (720×480 @ 30 fps for NTSC, 720×576 @ 25 fps for PAL) than those iTunes movie downloads, although its MPEG-2 video-compression scheme doesn't always produce the best video quality. (Here Blu-ray improves over DVD-Video: 1920×1080p @ cinematically-correct 24 fps and the option of either an improved version of MPEG-2 or the state-of-the-art MPEG-4 a.k.a. VC1 compression, although the latter requires faster CPUs as my Athlon x2 4200+ can't seem to handle it quite properly yet. Anyway my Dell 2405 LCD can't handle Blu-ray via DVI because of lack of HDCP.)<br><br>Anyway my point is clear: digital downloads still suck, DRM'd or not. Long live the physically-tangible optical formats! (CD, DVD, etc.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leroy Vargas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 12:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I the only one who thought this guy was trying to sound smart with the whole:<br>"lossless 16-bit linear PCM encoding that only introduces minimal magnitude-quantization error"<br><br>I laughed when I got that far and decided to reply.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Skullfighter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 1:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah, I think that if you feel obligated to pull out the wikipedia article to look for acronyms to spout out and feel smart, you probably should go do something else.  Also, thanks original poster, but I'm pretty certain everyone here already knew that CDs are higher quality than 128kbps AAC files.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 1:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I mean "lossless" in terms of frequency content. I noticed with a spectrum analyzer that most of my MP3/WMA rips at 128 kbps lack some high-frequency content present on factory-original CDs. Because I'm not that golden-eared (I can only distinguish audio up to 15 kHz, unfortunately), I can't judge by ear alone the quality of MP3/AAC/WMA vs CD-Audio, but properly-calibrated spectrum analyzers can tell the difference. How much I love audio engineering! That leaves magnitude quantization (something inevitable on the digital world) as the only source of errors for CD audio when converting from analog to digital audio.<br><br>Addendum to my DVD discussion: I can play DVDs on any, ANY DVD/Blu-ray player out there as long as their region codes match those of the players. Well, I have a region-free DVD player so this isn't an issue to me. However, I still need to see a region-free Blu-ray player...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leroy Vargas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Correct me if Im wrong Leroy, but your argument regarding the superiority of CD's over mp3 seems a little pointless when you state that you cant tell the difference between the two. <br><br>"I can't judge by ear alone the quality of MP3/AAC/WMA vs CD-Audio, but properly-calibrated spectrum analyzers can tell the difference."<br><br>Im no audiophile, but last time I checked, irrespective of how the music is encoded, musical enjoyment comes from listening to it via my ears, not some spectrum analyzer that properly calibrated to identify things my ears cant pick up.<br> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crypt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2007 7:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Probably you forgot that there are golden-eared people out there that can hear up to 20 kHz. Those people claim to distinguish quality between CD-Audio and 128-kbps MP3/AAC/WMA, when using the best-quality speakers and headphones (not earphones or any other cheapo speakers whose frequency response is quite limited).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leroy Vargas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2007 12:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Then why are YOU still buying in CD form when YOU can't tell the difference?<br><br>You made it about YOURSELF, not about golden eared people.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[z3r0D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because with CD-Audio, I have the guarantee that the music still has its original recording quality. With lossy download formats I don't have that guarantee. And, suppose that your computer crashes and needs a full format; you'll possibly lose all your downloads, but I still have the original physical CDs, and I can rip from them as many times as I want (into a lossless format).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leroy Vargas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2008 12:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[did no one else pick up on how he called MP3s and AACs "lossless" when in fact the correct word is "lossy"? :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Garrett]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2008 4:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I never called MP3/AAC lossless. When I said "lossless 16-bit linear PCM encoding that only introduces minimal magnitude-quantization error", I was talking about CD-Audio, dude. Please read the full sentence before jumping to stupid conclusions.<br><br>"…CDs preserve audio quality much better than those pesky 128-kbps MP3/AAC downloads because they [the CDs, not the MP3/AAC files] use lossless 16-bit linear PCM encoding that only introduces minimal magnitude-quantization error. …"<br><br>Just in case you misunderstood my sentence.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leroy Vargas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2008 8:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I dunno guys. I wonder if Movie Download will ever take off.  I mean music is something else, What else is there to be added to a CD... SACD didn t work and i am not sure i want to hear anything in 5:1. This is something different with movies... HD quality is taking off. 5:1 is almost obsolete to the advantage of 7:1... and there are so many extras when u actually buy a DVD... On top of that , it looks good on my shelves. (CD ? not much...). The way i see it, Movie Download make sense for TV shows, or OnDemand where it s basically thee same experience as going to a theater.... Who would pay nearly as much as a spanking new DVD just to watch it on a PC screen...<br>Years from now, we ll find papers trying to explain why the Movie business is still in... business and the Music business is all but dead. The only thing i am afraid of is that TV shows are gonna go thru the same crisis as Anime today. They are short to download (even shorter without commercial) and without DRM, a spanking new episode of LOST will be available to everyone in the worlds the following morning making is useless for international media groups to pay huge money for something people have already seen.<br>Movie Download will never work. TV shows Download will take off and will destroy network TV. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fabrice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 1:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem network TV has is that none of the consumers directly pay for the product except with their time.  And one of the huge parts of the digital age is convenience - my schedule, not theirs.  We watch what we want, when we want, and that doesn't leave room for ads.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 1:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I tend to agree with the comment about the (un)likely success of movie downloads. There is a short term issue of course with bandwidth. High definition compressed movies weigh in at gigabytes of size. In the UK certainly; our ISPs bash us with the fair use policy stick if you're using more than 40gb of bandwidth in a month.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theohner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 6:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it is the case in the US too (cf Comcast playing around with file sharing system). But I don't believe it s the main issue to the future failure of movie download. In densely populated countries like Taiwan or Hong Kong, or even in France (where i come from), download speeds are so high  ( 40 and even 70 gigs) that iTV is being offered as an alternative to cable and satellite TV. This is still unthinkable here (i would love to see how microsoft is going to do that with XBOX 360's iTV without buffering for long minutes.. and that s not even considering HD TV). Download time in the future will allow fast movie downloads. I still think the added value with extras and other goodies when you purchase a DVD is what will make the DVD or HD/Blue DVD a media that will not disappear anytime soon.  <br>Purchasing a song today has no meaning whatsoever compared to the experience of actually going to BestBuy and buy a CD. The product itself has become a disposable format that people accumulate in their Ipods without thinking twice and then are all surprised when they realized they actually bought the song when their Ipod shuffles to it. There s a long way to go to reach that point with movies. We did reach it with Anime thou. and this is the reason for all those distribution companies filing for bankruptcy. Next stop TV shows.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fabrice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 6:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Totally agree with you that it's more fun to go to a store to pick out a CD. I hate all the crap quality downloads and still go buy my music the traditional way. As for Anime, I can't agree more. But in this case it's not the convenience of digital downloads, because most rips are terrible quality. The problem is the distributors themselves who charge ridiculous amounts of money for it and yet the release quality is worse than that of originals from Japan and dubs are garbage 95% of the time. Seriously, average of $30 for a 2-3 episode disc is insane. Another thing is pretty much lack of trailers and such so people know what they're getting. No wonder people download the stuff online, most can't even afford to buy a full season of their favorite series w/t spending a week's worth of money. Corporate greed shall speak their undoing!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[eX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 9:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't get any movies to play from these 8 tracks, can anyone help??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Neal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/27/wal-mart-shuts-down-video-downloads-after-a-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess I'm the only one that actually tried out Walmart's download service?<br><br>I had to first install the Walmart downloader, which also installed the Walmart viewer (a bastardized Media Player).  Which you had to use to view the movie, because other players weren't allowed.  <br><br>I downloaded "Open Season" or whatever that animated Bear movie was called, and it did look good, sound good, and play well, and cost about 12 bucks.<br><br>Of course, I couldn't move it to any other computer or device, so my daughter ended up sitting at the computer, watching the movie.  I guess I could hook the computer to the TV, but I wasn't in the mood.<br><br>That was the first, and last, movie I bought/downloaded from Walmart.  <br><br>I think there's a future for movie downloading, but that wasn't it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coffee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2007 12:52PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
