<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[Work around ?  Non carbon ? Easier said than done.  Don't be surprised if they cut a deal with Nano-Proprietary.  Rumors f Canon contract for SED TVs with Chinese Govt for TV production and venue advertising are circulating.  Un-named source ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wendy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2008 12:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[The one thing I never understood is they were getting in trouble for using someone else's technology, but no one else has announced that they are even looking at coming out with anything related to SED other than Canon. So why is the patent holder being such dicks about it. Or are they just asking for too much money to license the tech for Canon to bother with it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darkest Daze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 5:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[A few years ago I decided to hold off buying an HDTV until I could get an SED display...<br><br>I'm still waiting...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Invisiblemoose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 6:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[dude, start holding your breath...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shmengie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 6:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah they need to hurry up already.<br><br>Meanwhile I got a 50" RPTV but as soon as SED arrives that thing's going in the bedroom.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 6:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was holding off until SED came out as well, but then I realized that it was vaporware and by the time it did come out (if ever), I could have been enjoying a great HDTV for many years.  So, I took the plunge and haven't regretted it for a second.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2008 12:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[OK.... interesting, I thought this tech was never going to make it to the market. Now the question is whether these "unrivaled black levels, brightness, and contrast" are better than what we'll get with OLED? Anyone know how these two display techs stack up against each other (aside from discussions of display size)? Will this be considerable cheaper than OLED?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skraddah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 6:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[The thing is that OLED is starting out with the same problem that LCD had, it's difficult to make large panels. SED has the opposite problem from what I've read, it's difficult to make small panels with small pixel pitch. So essentially if they were to be released at the same time OLED would rule the computer monitor segment of the market and SED the big screen TV market.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Odd TSi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 6:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[There is also the equaly or more important question of display life. Last I read OLED still has a fairly short lifespan for use in a home tv/computer monitor sestting.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhaughbb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 6:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hi Bhaugbb,<br><br>I think this problem has been largely overcome. If I remember correctly, OLED was mainly having a problem with the life of the blue (I think) LED, but I think that has recently been overcome. Yep...just checked wikipedia, and according to them, the lifespan is now about 20,000 hours on the blue LED, up from 5,000.<br><br>However, the current size restraints will be an issue. Interesting, so we have a new plasma vs. lcd market emerging.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skraddah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 6:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[Reports are coming in that samsung will show a 31" AM-OLED display at CES with a 35000 hour lifespan.<br>Just for demonstration though, but it brings some hope.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 9:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[I preferred the original acronym when it was known as a Carbon Nano Tube display.  What could the marketing guys possibly have had against that?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 6:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[average consumer might confuse it with CRT - old tech. as opposed to LED... which in a the averages comsumers eyes is considered a newer tech? just a guess.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 6:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[I always thought that carbon nano-tube was a different tech just because when they first announced carbon nano-tube TV's they said it would be possible to make a $400 46" display. I also remember reading about SED TV's around the same time and how they assumed the first displayed would be around $50k. Guess someone was confused, may have just been me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darkest Daze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 7:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[Read the bit at all? <br>"Canon is working on a "non-carbon" method of producing the sets"<br><br>So it seems carbon nanotubes are not strictly needed, so you can't name it after them if you don't use them can you?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 9:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isn't Asahi a Japanese beer?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zabador]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 6:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[Asahi Shinbun is the Japanese equivalent of the New York Times.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry Thomas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 8:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, it is a Japanese beer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeebus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2008 12:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[Praise Jeebus, I'm not loosing my mind!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zabador]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2008 12:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is that place on the display real? Where, what is it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Valgas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it's in Brazil. Maybe Mexico.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JTM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 8:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[It must be a "Senote" in  Mexico, near Cancun]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[osalom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 8:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pioneer Kuros look to be about 95% there, and after CES i think we'll see that they're even closer. I don't see where SED plans to be in the market. With plasmas and LCDs getting better almost monthly, the great advantages of SED are dwindling fast. I have no doubt that both plasmas and LCDs will be right up there with SED PQ in just a year or two. Add OLED to the picture and i'm afraid there's just no point in hugely expensive SED displays when much cheaper alternatives will easily offer an identical experience for 99% of the consumers out there.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 8:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[LCD's are sooo yesterday.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 9:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[You are correct, what you mean is improved LCD MAY(remember, MAY) defeat new SED.<br>I don't think improved SED canot defeat LCD.<br>Their difference is determined "genetically"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Raphael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2008 12:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[lets hope it doesn't use indium ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Owen V]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 9:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bet OLED/SED is ready for production.<br><br>It's like that pill that turns water into gasoline.  "They" have it.  The oil companies don't want you to watch OLED/SED based TVs.  They're afraid your TV will look so good you'll stay at home and not drive anywhere.<br><br>Where's that Oliver guy when you need him?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CaliforniaKid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 9:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon said to be developing own tech for SED TV production]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/canon-said-to-be-developing-own-tech-for-sed-tv-production/</guid><description><![CDATA[Finally some good news from Canon after the chaos of 2007.<br><br><a href="http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SED TV Guy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2008 9:27AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>