<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[*Imagines torture chair from MGS*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 8:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was thinking... why not just use sandpaper to create a series of small grooves instead of holes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 8:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because nano-imprint lithography sounds cooler]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[eek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 10:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not really understanding the point here.. LEDs are tiny and already extremely bright. <br><br>Just use 2 of 'em.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 8:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Reduced power consumption for twice the brightness with one LED? I think that's a great reason to make such a thing. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raja]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 9:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[oh wow...off topic, but ive been playing WAY to much super mario galaxy, thought this was a screen shot of the game at first...the green is a planet, the sliver is the trail from the spring star or whatever, background other planets...i need to get outside]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[master_sword]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 9:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[I saw a light with a circuit board in the background...<br><br>Maybe you should take a break, change the Nintendo biased icon, and not comment about Nintendo based games in an article that has nothing to do with Nintendo, games, or planets.<br><br>...or get some glasses/new monitor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can see an obvious issue here. If the LED is exposed then dust will cover up the holes and no advantage is gained. If they are encased behind plastic then no benefit. I can't see how this will make a real world difference.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mattclarkie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 10:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is the great bit.<br><br>There isn't one.<br><br>Hooray for useless but still better technology.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 3:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds like you don't really know the technology.  I may be assuming a bit like you, but I would suggest that holes made at a nano-level size would not be affected by dust particles, as dust particles are much larger (and even visible to the human eye).  Furthermore I don't see why optically the extra light produced would not be aided by a lens (encased) as normal LEDs often are. Were you suggesting this additional light is mysteriously stopped as soon as it passes through a transparent barrier, unlike the normal light produced?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[avesv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 4:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[I presume the aim of the nano holes is that they allow the photons to pass through without the intensitiy being diminished by a barrier of some sort. Anything that covers the holes would act exactly the same as an LED with no Nano holes. Unless the holes serve some other purpose than to allow the photons to be emitted without diminished intensity, I cannot see how it makes a difference outside of a vacuum.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mattclarkie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2008 5:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not surprising how LED's have evolved since the early days of indicator RED LED's<br><br>Today the Thin Film Technology Luxeon Rebel's and Cree XR-E LED's have crossed 100 lumens per watt in terms of efficiency... easily challenge the high efficiency CFL's<br><br>Added Advantage for for LED's apart from being hyperefficient is they do not require Mercury or Lead, last 50K hours and are more pleasing to Eyes.<br><br>I have a small reviews site for LED Flashlights at <a href="http://www.cpfreviews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cpfreviews.com</a> ... flashlights have come a long way since MiniMag AA was considered as Professional Tool.... Today, we have Flashlights in which we can Program Light Output Levels and a flashlight just the size of bezel of MiniMag AA could produce upwards of 150 Lumens Lasting for more than 2 hours Regulated. (MiniMag Produces 4 - 7 Lumens, non Regulated, 1 hour and diminishing to less than 1 lumen in 2 hours!!!)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CPFReviews.com]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just stop using them for Christmas Lights. I am on my 5th set in 3 years, and I need a 6th now. They break within hours of turning them on. I think the wiring is the problem. I have a set of Low Volt Incandecents which have the same functions, and they are 5 years old and still going strong. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mattclarkie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whatever happened to the 1000 lumen LED we were supposed to get 6 months ago?<br><br><a href="http://www.physorg.com/news93198212.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.physorg.com/news93198212.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeebus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[This reminds me of how the US Govmint "helps" the market. Ten years ago it was huge amounts of copper wires to network schools and now it's outlawing incandescent bulbs (to push CF bulbs.) The market brings wireless to reality and low cost which would have had far less cost than copper wires and now it looks like LED lights will surpass CF. LED has the potential for a full light spectrum, no heat and virtually no toxic components. Lets hope the market outpaces the "leaders" this time...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Thompson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 31st 2007 11:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Um, simple questions here.. <br><br>1. "fair bit brighter" means exactly HOW MUCH BRIGHTER?   (Someone mentioned 2x the brightness above but I havent read that anywhere yet)  Seems to me they should say exactly HOW Much is gained by this process.<br><br>2. What does this process do to lifespan?<br>Does brighter mean shorter lifespan?  Assuming this one also lasts 50K hours fine.<br><br>3. Are there new increased heat issues with the brighter bulbs?  Brighter normally means HOTTER.. or are these increased brightness yet same temp due to more effecient use of the same use of power?<br><br>Someone with specifics please reply.<br><br>thanks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WineStein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2008 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Researchers using nano-imprint lithography to make LEDs brighter]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/31/researchers-using-nano-imprint-lithography-to-make-leds-brighter/</guid><description><![CDATA[The linked article has little details and 30 seconds of searching on the Uni website didn't turn up more specifics BUT...<br><br>a lot of the light produced inside an LED is unable to escape from the semiconductor (ie the material that produces the light) because it gets internally reflected (imagine the light is generated inside a box, and the inside of the walls are mirrors - the idea is to make the mirrors more like windows in order to let the light out of the box).<br><br>Roughening of the surface (easiest idea to imagine) can help to reduce the reflectivity of the side walls of the LED. This enables more photons (light particles) to escape - and in fact would REDUCE the temperature of the device as these photons do not get stuck inside and turn into heat.<br><br>It sounds as though they are simply increasing extraction efficiency, but it is unclear if it is a photonic crystal type approach (basically making a pattern of holes to choose wavelengths of light to transmit - like the pattern of holes on your microwave door that stop that wavelength of radiation from escaping through the glass door).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[starwxrwx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 1st 2008 9:18PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
