<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone think 32 inches of digital photo frame is too much?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2008 5:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, nobody. <br>I bet there's a lot of people thinking "I'm not wasting money on a resolution like that" though. Seriously, 1366x768 at 32"!? I would not use a 20" screen at that res.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bad Beaver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2008 6:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[I do!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2008 10:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[I do so too.<br><br><a href="http://www.digital-photo-frame-market.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.digital-photo-frame-market.info</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hannes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2008 5:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is fail. I know its acceptable for LCD Televisions to be 32 inches large and have resolutions as low as 1366*768, but this is a photo-frame. Its meant to hold a photograph(s) to be enjoyed, looked at...thus they need resolution. This does not have a high resolution at all. Again, on an LCD TV its a non issue as its viewed from distance where the human eye does the hard work, but I'd get relatively close to a 32" photo. And see the flaw.<br><br>And a high resolution 32" panel would be rather expensive to use as a photoframe, so I'm afraid in my eyes, this has failed rather hard. It's just a crappy 32" LCDTV with a printer duct taped on the side.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2008 6:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[a 32" photo frame? So they've made a Television that sucks?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2008 6:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah so I see I'm not the only one who thinks that a 32'' LCD photo frame is just a LCD TV with a memory card reader]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[x20mar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2008 6:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is the worst idea ever. The only way it could ever be justified is if it were ridiculously power efficient, plus, like some other guy said the resolution is terrible for photo viewing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Meridimus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2008 7:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[Call me crazy, but at that size you wouldn't necessarily display your photos, but high resolution art by famous artists. It used to be that whenever you saw the future depicted on TV or a movie they'd do that. It's a cool idea, but probably not worth paying what they will be asking for it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2008 10:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/smartparts-prepping-a-32-inch-digital-photo-frame-another-with/</guid><description><![CDATA[Next thing you know, someone will invent a 32" photoframe with a built in computer.  OMGWTF.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PEZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2008 12:31PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>