<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[wat.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem is that it uses MLC. MLC is cheaper than SLC because it seriously sacrifices performance. Durability is decreased to 10% of SLC and read/write rates are about halved. In addition, because it is inherently more taxing to read/write, error frequency increases.<br><br>This defeats the purpose of having an SSD. I'm sure that BITMICRO has some innovation that they aren't telling everyone, but it could just be a promotional ploy. Either way, I'd be wary of any MLC products, whether it be SSD, CF, or even microSDs.<br><br>Sorry to rain on your parades.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hung]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[thats a big step forward!<br><br>(inserts link to lame blog here)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 2:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[The 832GB number is bogus.<br><br>The manufacturer's site says:<br>2.5-inch: 8 to 416 GB*<br>* Up to 64 GB at 8.5 mm height<br><br>You see - no mention of 832GB.<br>And i can't help but wonder if 64GB is 8,5 mm thick, is the 416GB disk that the manufacturer IS talking about, 55mm thick??? Come on, click the link on the article i dare you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xfr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 3:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[What does it cost? $10,000?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Humperdink]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[1 bazillion dollars and 3 Hawaiian islands.  And not the crappy ones, the GOOD ONES.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now that's what I'm talking about! :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Keim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Exactly what I was thinking,<br><br>The cost is probably outrageous, so when it comes down under $100 call me :-P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paragraph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[here, here... to both of you]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[applefreak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 1:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Under $100.<br><br>Good God that could be quite a while.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chebwa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 1:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[chewba, probably not. flash drops so fast these days.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dj-kenpo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 2:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dj-kepno:<br><br>This is how much 128GB costs.<br><br><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820609245" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820609245</a><br><br>It may drop fast, but not that fast, man. I say again... it culd be a while. A long while.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chebwa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I read the article 3 times to make sure I wasnt doing it wrong. that is a ridiculous amount of storage.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Br0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[haha try 5+ times...<br><br>I love technology!  You can always count on it to get bigger / better / faster]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CarpeD1em500]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dont forget harder and stronger ;]]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Br0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[well they work it harder, make it better, move it faster , which makes them stronger.  right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[podphreak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 2:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't wait much longer!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobius_1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 9:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[/The/ best thing about this is that that song /just/ came on shuffle as I read the comment. Amazing, haha.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Velorium]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2008 3:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[It isnt a rediculous amount of storage, its just a lot of FLASH. Not to mention a ridiculous price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PEZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[how many laptops(maybe alienware) i would be able to buy with its price ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tamoghno]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mulitple Alienware?  Try multipe Falcon-Northwest Laptops.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zelatio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[damn ! i really did not knew about the company before, shame on me !]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tamoghno]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Alienware > Falcon NW<br><br>Alienware offers SLi 8800GTX,, Falcon NW only offers SLi 8700]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DjurS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[That may be, but FNW still beats them in the "Outrageously Expensive" category. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zelatio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[ How about one of those overpriced Macs? Those things are expensive!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveMB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 5:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SteveMB<br><br>Please post links to a lesser priced "Name Brand" PC with equal or greater specs (including CPU cache, bus speed, memory speed, etc.) than a Mac.  I bet you cannot find 2, probably not any.<br><br>The reason Macs "seem" more expensive is that they only have 3 models in each category (with a few exceptions).  Models being 1. The absolute latest technology, 2. One step below that, 3. One more step below that.  Categories being Pro Desktop, Consumer Desktop, Mini Desktop, Pro Notebook, Consumer Notebook, and iPod (which has recently expanded beyond the 3 - Classic, Mini, Shuffle).  That's the business model.  And it works <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?chdnp=0&chdd=1&chds=1&chdv=1&chvs=maximized&chdeh=0&chfdeh=0&chdet=1199555325000&chddm=492269&q=NASDAQ:AAPL" rel="nofollow">http://finance.google.com/finance?chdnp=0&chdd=1&chds=1&chdv=1&chvs=maximized&chdeh=0&chfdeh=0&chdet=1199555325000&chddm=492269&q=NASDAQ:AAPL</a><br><br>Other companies like Dell continue to sell 3-5 year old technology which gives the illusion of greater value.  If you want the same kind of bargains with Apple, you have to go through a retailer like Small Dog.  Apple is a hard nosed company, who cares very little about freedom.  They design an exquisite user experience and deliver their vision for what computing should be.  It's unique and many people love.  If you don't, they are not going to change for you, or make it easy for you to change it for yourself.  The phrase "how do you like them apples" does not apply, because nobody cares how you like 'em.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RichardBronosky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2008 12:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[While i do love Apple computers, and while they certainly tend to have the latest processors, their laptops consistently have lots of RAM and their style is second to none, they do not excel at providing good platforms with high end graphics cards - something i expect if i'm shelling out that kind of money.  Presumably this will gradually change - the MacBook Pro is getting better for instance - but for now they are not considered "high-end" in one of the most important areas.  This is arguably unimportant for an OS like OSX and for the general needs of Apple consumers, but for those who want the best, Apple sometimes doesn't cut it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2008 5:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[832Gb in a SSD? Eh... I'm holding out for a TB.<br><br>(BTW, I'll be so greatful if I can get 64GB in my MacBook Slim next week!)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[The question is what the read/write speeds are. Until now the only suitable SSD solution was with SLC, since MLCs read/write were too slow. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[manny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, there goes a years salary!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Cox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 2:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Forget about paying for one or robbing a bank. I want to know where they will be stocking this babies. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Homeboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now just need a few of those in a raid....a very big and extreme expensive raid array..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Holy Cow!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pquistgard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[How much?! how much?!<br><br>...no, you were right not to tell us.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[for some reason I just read your comment in a dr zoidburg voice.<br><br>too much futurama.<br><br>I keep rereading it though in the same voice....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dj-kenpo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 2:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol!  <br><br>You can -never- have enough futurama.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2008 8:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[If available and cheap enough, I think I'll build my next system with four 64GB SSD drives in RAID 0. The Witcher should load a lot faster that way (and all my other games for that matter).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[qbix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[screw faster, the benefit is they'll be silent!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dj-kenpo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[...............and it's 2.5 inches as well. I would happily give up my HP Pavilion for that hard drive. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Homeboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[But what would you use it for without a comptuer :-P<br><br>Also, this thing probably costs as much as the Apature Science's Portal Generating Device, as you know that costs more all of the organs in subject's home town!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paragraph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[a portal reference! :D<br>the first of mamy to come i hope.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Senor_Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Paragraph<br>You had me rolling with that one!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Skullfighter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2008 9:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[are we sure it's not eight 32 GB drives? Where TH do they get the number 832 from?<br><br>Other than that, suhweeet..... just make that $150 and I'll buy a couple :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wickedpheonix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[832 / 32 = 26<br><br>It Divides evenly, so it's possible they have 26 32gb chips in there :-P (honestly, i don't know how small chips are, and the capacity, but i do know it's not shenanigans worthy)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paragraph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[If anyone did not geekgasm instantly upon reading the article title, they have no place to be on engadget. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bl0nde]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[woot, cause i had one of those uber uber geek moments upon reading that headline.<br><br>'teh future is niiiiigh!']]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Will H.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 3:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[There are already HDDs at 1 TB so this is not that impressive. Just allot of chips stacked together. Make them smaller though is more impressive.<br><br>And I bet they won't tell you how many read and writes you get before a specific area is unusable again... And, how much is it? ^^ Get me this at the price of a 1 TB disk and I buy it!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl Viklund]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sure 1tb in a 3.5" form factor I haven't seen any in a 2.5" form factor yet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DonatoM3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[By the time one of those hard drives have exceeded their read/write cycles your IBM hard drives will have failed and died at least a 100 times.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Homeboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/04/bitmicro-introduces-832gb-ssd-for-ces-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sweet Zombie Jon Stewart!<br><br>I was expecting a slow progression in SSD size, but, dayum. So for the price of one of those I could afford multiple backup laptops and a french maid to carry said backups around with me?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Duane Young]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2008 12:50PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
