<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[This looks pretty good. Will this 6MP beat the Nikon D40? Probably not. Will it be a good deal anyway? Certainly!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[usedHONDA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 7:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[Amazing FPS but you cant call it a "prosumer" camera if its not a digital SLR<br><br>Putting a high price tag on it doesn't make it prosumer]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe_Templeman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 7:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not DSLR? 'guess that explains the price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy K.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 7:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[Huh? Since when?<br><br>You know, I, too, would argue that this is not a real pro camera.<br><br>But also SLRs are not automatically pro cameras. Neither are small-sensor-cameras (which others, for all the wrong reasons, tend to call point-and-shoot-cameras) automatically not pro cameras (Canon G9, Ricoh GR digital one and two, Lumix LX1 and LX2 and some others, I'm looking in your direction). Moreover, there are cameras that are not SLRs, but that are nevertheless considered (and always have been) pro tools. (Rangefinders anyone? Like the Leica M8?)<br><br>But you are right about one thing: the "prosumer" category is a very strange category. I wouldn’t want to call myself a prosumer, even if I may very well own what some might very well try to sell to me as a prosumer camera (GRD II). Even though I do not earn any money with my camera. It’s just a hobby. Maybe I would be ready to call myself an enthusiast. Clearly, some term is needed to describe the difference between point-and-shoots and so called prosumer cameras. Well, I know it when I see it, so I guess I might not need any fancy labels.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 8:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who said it wasn't a DSLR?  Just because it's a fixed-lens means it can't be "prosumer"?  That is simply false.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kempcross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 8:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[What ^^Michael^^ said, nice comment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kempcross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 8:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[Prosumer term was around before DSLRs]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[roflercopterer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 9:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[OK, maybe "not a DSLR" was a bad reason for saying it wasnt prosumer, but I still believe its not a prosumer camera. <br><br>To me, most of the cameras you listed *are* prosumer cameras, but I do not beleive this is. Things like the Leica's are prosumer because they house fantastic quality lenses, the ricoh for similar reasons, but this seems to be a total gimmick.<br><br>Personally its neither here nor there. If you want a decent camcorder, you buy a decent camcorder. If you want a decent camera, you buy a decent camera! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Templeman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 9:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, it looks a lot like a goofy camera with not really much of a market to go for.<br><br>On the other hand, super-zooms also found their market. And to me at least, those cameras also seemed very goofy. I can see those people buying super-zooms also buying a camera like this. (Hm. If they have some spare money. Quite some.)<br><br>But the specs aren’t that bad. And Casio always produced cameras with a decent handling (that are also very well built). Not the best when it comes to things like manual control, but certainly also not the worst. To me, Casio cameras never really felt like the real deal when it comes to cameras. They always had this slightly odd and different approach to digital cameras (it may very well be that this is just something I’m making up, because until less than four or so years ago I only knew them for their watches and calculators).<br><br>Nevertheless, if those 6 MP are useable at high iso speeds (6 MP seem to be just perfect for that.) and with f2.7 at 7.3 mm (BTW. what’s the 35 mm equivalent to that?) and f4.6 at telephoto this could turn out to be a decent low light shooter. And if you then also like making movies or even high-speed movies, this is your camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 10:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[No image stabilization, no conversion lenses, not enough background blur (essentially the same as in my HV20 camcorder). Not that great.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eugenia Loli-Queru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 7:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[wait, 60fps FULL resolution?? for how long? at what quality? im wondering if memory cards can keep up with the speed...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xiux]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 7:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[video is 30fps...why would u need a still to shoot at 60fps unless you want to see a golf ball bend at impact? Seriously? Please to explain.<br><br>thx!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 8:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[Umm.. you do realise that most, if not all, televised sports are broadcast at 60fps. In fact, due to interlacing, all DV camcorders record at 60fps by default. Only progressive scan cameras shoot at anything slower than that.<br><br>Now if you are referring to the 1200fps mode, then yes, there are some of us who would really like to be able to shoot our own super slow motion videos. Every camera doesn't have to be made to please the lowest common denominator.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Tilley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 8:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[DV cameras aren't 60fps.  An interlace is only half an image, you would see black lines all over it.  They are 60 fields per second if that's what you mean, but that is a lot different than a true 60fps camera, which would be what HDTVs with 120hz try to emulate.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[silentreformation]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 9:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[Neither here nor there for me ,if i want a HD videocam,i'd get one does 1080p @ 24 fps, if i want a camera with 6mp, i get it at $60... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolant8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 8:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is *really* cool, and I'll probably get one as soon as the street price starts to come down off the MSRP peg. There are a lot of things done right here.<br><br>The high frame rate at full resolution (60fps for 1s = 60 frame buffer) and 'pre-trigger' (the shutter release *stops* the camera and saves shots up to that point) are great, and the slow-mo movies (300fps at SDTV-ish resolution)  For a small sensor camera, 6MP is a good tradeoff between noise and resolution, and with f/2.7 at 36mm equivalent, it's relatively fast. It has some other entertaining features, too, like 1/40000 shutter speeds.<br><br>The apparent lack of image stabilization is the one thing that bothers me. I'd like a wider zoom, but 36-432mm equivalent is par for the course in SuperZooms.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zandr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 12:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, I didn't know it has "pre-trigger".  That feature was on my first digital camera (from the 90s) which saved several pictures right up to the shutter button press.  Great feature, unfortunately not found on most cameras that I know of.  (That camera was a Casio)  My current main camera also has that feature, only for movie mode, so I can sit and wait for something to happen, and then it starts recording 5 seconds before shutter button press. (also a Casio)  Both current camera and first camera also have more "manual controls" and useful special features than other cameras I've had.  I think if this one second 60fps buffer for pre-trigger is true, that would be great for capturing "the moment".  So would 15fps, but this way we have perfectly smooth video for one second once we all have 4k displays sitting around.  Again, this camera is for users of slow motion, especially with the 300fps unlimited VGA.  (with good inter-frame compression!)<br>One important question though: Anyone know about the shutter responsiveness, startup times, etc.  If it was operationally fast, that would be really nice.  In fact, that could be the deal breaker.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/casio-gets-official-with-the-ex-f1-60fps-prosumer-camera-camco/</guid><description><![CDATA[No info on timing, and startup times certainly matter. I'd argue that the pretrigger makes shutter responsiveness moot, though.<br><br>It appears the frame rate is adjustable, there are references in the specs to 60fps, 5fps (which gives you 12 seconds of buffer) and 7fps flash photography.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zandr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 7th 2008 2:17PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>