<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Hands-on with Netgear's RangeMax Dual Band Wireless-N Router</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/hands-on-with-netgears-rangemax-dual-band-wireless-n-router/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Hands-on with Netgear's RangeMax Dual Band Wireless-N Router</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with Netgear's RangeMax Dual Band Wireless-N Router]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/hands-on-with-netgears-rangemax-dual-band-wireless-n-router/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/hands-on-with-netgears-rangemax-dual-band-wireless-n-router/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just a quick question -- does dual band mean it will put out both 802.11g and 802.11n signal so that my n-capable devices can use it and my poor g devices won't muck up the network?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with Netgear's RangeMax Dual Band Wireless-N Router]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/hands-on-with-netgears-rangemax-dual-band-wireless-n-router/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/hands-on-with-netgears-rangemax-dual-band-wireless-n-router/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just to clarify, it will operate a G netork and an N network at the same time, meaning your G devices connectivity will not impede N devices, and vice versa.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crabbydude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 30th 2008 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with Netgear's RangeMax Dual Band Wireless-N Router]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/hands-on-with-netgears-rangemax-dual-band-wireless-n-router/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/hands-on-with-netgears-rangemax-dual-band-wireless-n-router/</guid><description><![CDATA[It means it operates at the 2.5Ghz and 5.0Ghz spectrums, that is all. It should be backward compatible with the older g, and possibly, a and b bands. At least most routers are that way.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[killeryo2002]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with Netgear's RangeMax Dual Band Wireless-N Router]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/hands-on-with-netgears-rangemax-dual-band-wireless-n-router/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/hands-on-with-netgears-rangemax-dual-band-wireless-n-router/</guid><description><![CDATA[ Why 5GHz, wouldn't the lower frequency of 2.5GHz (or should that be 2.4GHz?) travel farther, go through objects better and also be less susceptible to metal and dense objects but a 5GHz signal wouldn't?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dhughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2008 1:54PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
