If you've been waiting for the high-bandwidth routing solution of your dreams, perhaps Netgear's new offering will fit the bill. We have to say we were fairly impressed with its rock-solid management of multiple streams, and we're pretty excited about the push for the 5GHz band. Up close, the router isn't something you'd need to tuck behind a curtain, either. Check the gallery for a closer look at the little monster.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Bentley @ Jan 6th 2008 1:41PM
a high speed wireless router without the (highest speed) routing basics- ethernet ports.
I think netgear forgot why they're making this particular device...
honestly, who actually uses a wireless router without at least *ONE* pc near the hard-line? Usually their primary one?
JohnTitor @ Jan 6th 2008 1:47PM
not me, but I do need one Ethernet port for my MG-35 to do NDAS, plus I have printer connected through USB (it's an ASUS router with print server built-in)
Ubercharged @ Jan 6th 2008 1:53PM
i agree, my house is CAT5 wired so i need at least 4 ethernet ports for all the computers that use it
iofthestorm @ Jan 6th 2008 2:12PM
Huh? In the 2nd picture, I definitely see 2 ethernet ports. Now, if you're talking about gigabit ethernet, you might have a point but I don't see anything about what type of ethernet ports those are.
shane @ Jan 6th 2008 2:34PM
I've always thought the additional ports on wireless routers superflouos. I can't imagine too many situations where the ideal place for wireless broadcasting also the place where you want a nest of ethernet cabling to terminate. I live in a pretty standard two-story home and try to keep the wireless router as close to the center of the home as possible. This puts it on the main floor where I don't have a single permanently desked machine. I have a single hardline run to the switches in a basement closet where all of my wiring terminates (also typical). When I first moved in I did make do with placing the router down there but it became quickly obvious that broadcasting my wireless from the most remote, concrete-fortified corner of the house was not ideal. And I don't think my wife would be too keen on my rewiring the house to have everything terminate in the nook on the main floor where the router sits.
steve @ Jan 7th 2008 8:54PM
@shane
I tend to put the router next to my NAS's. I'd rather use ethernet for NAS for performance. There are few wi-fi NAS's of reasonable price
Jake @ Jan 6th 2008 2:13PM
It would be neat if they'd add an OLED display showing how many devices are (wirelessly) attached to the router. Something this pretty should have some "wow"s for extra umph.
Jman @ Jan 6th 2008 4:00PM
MY APPLE AIRPORT EXTREME IS SET TO 5GHZ 802.11N RIGHT NOW. This is nothing new. Just from a different company.