http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/ Engadget Comments for Moletech Fuel Saver theoretically saves fuel http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/
http://stores.ebay.com.au/MegaSavings2000/Other-FIR-Fuel-Savers.html

I will try a lower price one than spending $300 for a trial.

]]>Jan 27th 2008 7:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/Jan 6th 2008 11:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/The ceramic powder of the Mtech Fuel Saver absorbs thermal energy and re releases it in a different specific wavelength.]]>Jan 6th 2008 1:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/Jan 6th 2008 11:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/Jan 6th 2008 12:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/Jan 6th 2008 11:47AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/Jan 6th 2008 12:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/Rather than try and cut the consumption of a Gas guzzler your better of saving $1,000 by not buying one in the first place.

But anything that at least makes you think about fuel consumption must be a good thing, right?

]]>Jan 6th 2008 1:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/Jan 6th 2008 12:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/Jan 6th 2008 1:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/
The only actual report they have is a PDF from a Professor of Environmental Engineering in Australia who talks about the theoretical benefits of the device (with no actual testing done). They have a single letter from a California engine testing lab, which has a couple of nice phrases but no actual numbers on those thoretical increases in efficiency (wonder how much they paid for that no-details letter), and a whole lot of gobbledegook about how the thing's supposed to work.

I can't believe you guys actually put this on Engadget without a big "NEWEST FRAUD" headline.

Let me guess - the next story is going to be about monometal impedance-tuned catalytic wiring for speakers, with vastly improved conductivity so your stereo saves money on electricity...
]]>Jan 6th 2008 12:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/
If it was made of lead it would do wonders for your engine (just not your health).]]>Jan 6th 2008 1:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/
Their word alone certainly proves nothing to the viability of these suppository looking devices that you drop in your tank, secure in your air-box and attach to your radiator hose.

"Mtech Fuel Saver uses a revolutionary world leading technique called Molecular Reaction Technology. It is totally different to all other fuel saving devices around the world. We use Nano Negative Ion technology which is researched and developed by ITRI (Industrial Technology
Research Institute, Taiwan Government). The Negative Ion releases a negative electric charge in the oxygen molecule and activates it. Institute tests have shown that our Fuel Saver can increase the inhalant amount of oxygen by 20%."

They provide no explanation in any of the downloadable or web literature as to how and why the 3 individual 'sensors' communicate with eachother, or what exactly the 'calibration' process of revving your engine to 50%-60% of maximum RPM load for 2-5 minutes based on engine age actually accomplishes.

Only thing missing is a magic wand. No wait, your pocket has *magically* lost $299... there you go.

]]>Jan 6th 2008 1:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/Jan 6th 2008 1:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/Jan 6th 2008 3:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/Jan 6th 2008 3:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/moletech-fuel-saver-theoretically-saves-fuel/Jan 6th 2008 10:49PM