http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/ Engadget Comments for Video: Logitech Squeezebox Duet http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/B&O remote control？
sadly,too big one!]]>Jan 6th 2008 7:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/
In fact, I wonder if Logitech would be decent enough to exchange the shitty Wireless DJ system I bought, foolishly (like many others) expecting it to do what it says on the tin...]]>Jan 6th 2008 7:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/Jan 6th 2008 1:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/Jan 6th 2008 8:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/Could you please lend me some advice on how to get my iphone to remote start my car.

Gosh... has no one mentioned "Sonos" in this thread.

Somebody who really knows what this device does, please speak up.

]]>Jan 7th 2008 8:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/
Yes, the remote is a little large, but it's also a full blown linux computer stuffed into that little case which is open to for all developers to tweak until their blue in the face. You can SSH into this device and add your own applications if you like.

Do not confuse this with Logitech's DJ system, it is a product of Logitech's purchase of Slimdevices and is built with the same quality and attention to detail as any of the Slimdevice's line of products.]]>Jan 6th 2008 11:34AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/Jan 6th 2008 11:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/Their handheld controller looks nice, but at $250.00 why do I need it when I already control my exisiting SB via WiFi.....?
If you don't have a good mobile WiFi device the new controller would be a reasonable buy.]]>Jan 6th 2008 12:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/Jan 6th 2008 1:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/Hack please ASAP!]]>Jan 6th 2008 2:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/
You can use the Controller with existing Squeezeboxes, atleast as far back as the Squeezebox2, and should work with the original Squeezebox, and probably the slimp3. This is how the beta testers have been using the new Controller remote.

What is not possible right now is to add the Receiver to an existing network of Squeezeboxes without the new remote.]]>Jan 6th 2008 10:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/Jan 6th 2008 4:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonbauer/2201055378/]]>Jan 18th 2008 3:44AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/There are, however, a few things to look out for. First of all, not user-friendly for people who aren't tech-savvy. The software (which is open source so should improve) is a little clunky and not all that customizable. Also, the remote takes a good 30 seconds to power up, which can be a little annoying if you're impatient.
Having said that, it's sweet. I'm streaming tons of music from my cpu to the squeezebox. My cpu doesn't even have to be on for me to access internet radio and other music services through the device.
My best friend has the Sonos set up and, in my opinion, this sounds at least as good (you're not forced to use the crappy amp found within the Sonos unit so, theoretically, you can have better sound) and works just as well.
The Squeezebox remote has a longer battery life and, unlike the Sonos, the battery can be replaced. Sonos finally has some serious competition.]]>Mar 13th 2008 1:11PM